Kamila & Kristy ~ General Chat for this Apartment May 01,2016. to May 31,2016.

[English]

18 minutes ago, HarleyFatboy said:

K&K is a perfect example of this!   There apparently was enough people sending them emails and expressing their desire to have them back and POOOF.....they are back and I'm sure the contract negotiations were such that they (K&K) don't have to show anything unless they choose to and RLC agreed due to popular demand.   Just don't kid yourself for one second in thinking that RLC doesn't have any control over the tenants of these apartments!

You are spot on about K&K, RLC were bombarded when they left and now they are back.

[metmij2]

Hello all

first I dont think  most  waned to see only sex .many sex on the net ,  we  waned to see real life as posseble in these apts  and real life is not for me lying on bed most of the days .

visitors who come in my place dont stay the whole week or longer !!! ,and when the come the respect my place .

I think no one have problems for visitors to stay for lets say 2 or 3 days .

but when the stay longer and  spoils the whole atmosphere in the house  !!! or when the people in the apt can't being themselves any more .

I waned the visitors to stay away !!

I think it is hard enough for people to stay 24/7 "under surveilkance "(cam).

we all know that people in the apt have a conection with us ( look what nelly ,Carla wrote to us all  ) we like to follow them we even have fan site's pages .

some have a limit of time to show us what nice people the are ( vissum ) show real life have a good time and  have fun .

now we most look at some strange wierd people we claim the whole room , and so the real poeple in the apt can show us what the came for in the first place ,I hate this .

so for me visitors can stay for 2 days and then go .

its my own opinion and this is what I think .

sorry for my bad english

greetings metmij

 

[HarleyFatboy]

37 minutes ago, metmij2 said:

Hello all

first I dont think  most  waned to see only sex .many sex on the net ,  we  waned to see real life as posseble in these apts  and real life is not for me lying on bed most of the days .

visitors who come in my place dont stay the whole week or longer !!! ,and when the come the respect my place .

I think no one have problems for visitors to stay for lets say 2 or 3 days .

but when the stay longer and  spoils the whole atmosphere in the house  !!! or when the people in the apt can't being themselves any more .

I waned the visitors to stay away !!

I think it is hard enough for people to stay 24/7 "under surveilkance "(cam).

we all know that people in the apt have a conection with us ( look what nelly ,Carla wrote to us all  ) we like to follow them we even have fan site's pages .

some have a limit of time to show us what nice people the are ( vissum ) show real life have a good time and  have fun .

now we most look at some strange wierd people we claim the whole room , and so the real poeple in the apt can show us what the came for in the first place ,I hate this .

so for me visitors can stay for 2 days and then go .

its my own opinion and this is what I think .

sorry for my bad english

greetings metmij

 

That was my whole point earlier.....you hit the nail on the head!

[mr1010]

4 hours ago, HarleyFatboy said:

Highlighted in red is the bottom line and is what did it for me!   If every time Kamila gets horny and wants to masturbate and goes in the bathroom out of sight of the cameras, this is considered hiding and there is nothing even close to real about it.  Kristy, according to you all adds something to the bath water that discolors it which is a form of hiding and according to you all only has any kind of sex out of the apartment.......no realism there what so ever!!  Carl and Mario just need to go....PERIOD!   Dasha & Demid have lost allot of viewers due to hidden sex by the covers and Dasha doesn't masturbate openly like she used to anymore from what I'm hearing.   Rita, lovely Rita meter maid.....according to you all turns her back to the camera every time she changes clothes or gets dressed.....once again, no value for subscribers!   Leora & Paul have no value anymore from what I've read.  Maya & Stepan the same as Leora & Paul.  Zoya & Lev....it would be better if it was just Zoya & NO Lev!!

Adriana & Daniel are voyeurs dream and play the role nicely from what I remember and appear to stay on a steady course with how they approach the project of RLC.   Nina & Kira may be lesbians but when I was a subscriber they were open book lesbians and probably still are to this day.   Masha & Sasha are great for the project and enjoy subscribers watching them have sex and Masha is not afraid to diddle in the middle while she openly masturbates....more real than 80% of the other apartments on RLC.  Nelly & Bogdan seemed to be liked by allot of you but I hardly watched them due to poor camera placements.....views are to far away from the action which is also true in many apartments.   Suzan & Hector have had their share of quarrels, and ups & downs but sounds like they are doing much better according to several people on CC and are a value to RLC.  Barca apartment sounds like if it wasn't for Elisa, it would be sucking hind tit but due to her she is managing to keep allot of people interested and is a value to RLC subscribers!

Anezka & Karel and Vanessa & Thomas are two apartments that I really don't follow and just hit the (Mark as read) button 98% of the time so it's not fair for me to pass any kind of judgement upon them.

 

The bottom line in my opinion is that the "Real" has been slowly taken away from the RLC concept and if it continues, I don't see RLC making it too much longer.   I hope things change and they can turn it around before they go tits up!!

Good post Harley. Of course you are relying a lot on what we say,but it is not a bad analysis.

What we should say is that RLC has exhibitionists that are very open down to hiding. We do have a lot of choices, but it is not true real life.

If the participants are all true exhibitionists then it is more show, and if they hide and tease then it is not real when they are having sex and bating just outside of the cameras.

Personally, I want to see more shown but not full exhibitionism. What is the magic point? Who knows?  Kami is more likely to show us more than Kristy who honestly is much more conservative than people think. And Elisa will show us much more than Vika or Rita.

Right now, RLC has become very boring honestly.

And then banning the subscribers is not smart business.

RLC needs to spice things up. But, how do they do it?

[mr1010]

3 hours ago, alanohio said:

Once again we get into what is real and what is not. Some of you guys talk like nothing ever changes in life and everyone is identical to everyone else. The complaint is usually like this...

Apt 1, 4, and 7 are "real". They don't hide, they walk around naked, and they have sex on the couch.

Apt 2,3,5, and 9 are kinda "real" but the girls wear clothes too much.

Apt 6, 8, and 10 are totally fake. They have sex under blankets, the guy is always telling the girl to cover herself up, and sometimes they go days without sex.

Guess what? What I just described is EXACTLY what real life is. It IS NOT people that walk around naked 24/7, have sex 4 times a day on the couch, and masturbate in full view. Real life is different things all the time.

RLC has to live with this too, unless you think they should "demand" all couple have sex at least 3 times a day and they don't provide blankets or rooms without cameras.

Get over it guys. This IS real life, it's not a porn channel.

It is quasi-porn by the way. There have been many, many sex acts including anal and three way (Nina/Kira and friend).

And it isn't real life either. Only real life is if we have a hidden camera and watch them live their lives and that is illegal and unethical.

They mostly are exhibitionists and they are aware of the cameras and do play to them at times. Some are basically doing shows. Leora's bate, Masha and Sasha, Nelly & Bogdan, Efim and gf, Suzan and Hector. Masha and Leora would set up perfectly for the cameras when they bated.

Kami and Kristy play up to the cameras too. So does Elisa. The difference is that K & K basically have admitted they will not show us anything (except Kami later did). And Rita will never show us anything. Obviously, this is not real life. In real life, people do not have sex or bate under covers, do not have it outside the apartments all the time. The truth? Those participants refuse to be exhibitionists in certain situations. They don't buy into the idea of true voyeur site. In a true voyeur sex site, the participants have the sex before the cameras. Otherwise, why are they here? Free rent? Food money? Possible bonuses?

This is entertainment this site. It is just that some refuse to provide some of it.

And no one is saying they must have sex. Just that if they have it, they shouldn't hide it. That is when it becomes a tease.

Like I wouldn't expect a virgin to have sex. But someone with a bf who just doesn't bring him over or they have their sex in his apt. are honestly just ripping off their customers. This isn't a non-sex site. Kami was heard saying early on that she would never have it there of course. Why, because you have the right to withhold what you normally do? How is that a true voyeur experience? Are they really doing what they normally do?

That is my take on rlc. Still worth me staying here.... for now.

[HarleyFatboy]

6 minutes ago, mr1010 said:

Good post Harley. Of course you are relying a lot on what we say,but it is not a bad analysis.

What we should say is that RLC has exhibitionists that are very open down to hiding. We do have a lot of choices, but it is not true real life.

If the participants are all true exhibitionists then it is more show, and if they hide and tease then it is not real when they are having sex and bating just outside of the cameras.

Personally, I want to see more shown but not full exhibitionism. What is the magic point? Who knows?  Kami is more likely to show us more than Kristy who honestly is much more conservative than people think. And Elisa will show us much more than Vika or Rita.

Right now, RLC has become very boring honestly.

And then banning the subscribers is not smart business.

RLC needs to spice things up. But, how do they do it?

Obviously I don't have any of the answers, by the replies that I see for the most part.  The simple solution in my mind is a better screening/casting agent.  Now before you all go off on thinking that I'm referring to them screening the applicants so they get the one's that are going to have sex like N&B or M&S or masturbate in the open like Masha or Zoya.....I'm not saying that at all.   What I am saying though is that when they screen the applicants, I'm sure allot of the questions involve sex and sexual situations....hell, they might even ask them if they masturbate and how often for all I know.   The point is, is that if they do masturbate or have sex it shouldn't be hidden from people that pay good money to see the tenants if that is what the tenants want to do.  In my opinion, under no circumstances should the tenants be allowed to hide from the cameras unless it's a life threatening situation.    Let's say that one of the girls in Barca likes to masturbate allot and she doesn't care if it hair lips every pussy cat in the alley.   At the same time there might be another girl in Barca that might masturbate twice a month and when that time comes she locks herself up in the laundry room or the downstairs bathroom or in the entry way for that matter.   Now you have a girl (the same girl) that allot of people had been wondering if and when it was going to happen, and it finally happens but you don't get to see anything, no facial expressions, no toes curling, no blanket moving, no nothing and I don't feel that is right.   Ahhh never mind, I could go on but it's like talking to a brick wall.   You have your PRO supporters of RLC that are never going to change/agree and then you have me......I'm out numbered so what's the point!!

[metmij2]

NEVER WE SEE REAL LIFE IN RLC !!!  one thing for sure , the all acting and  the all know aware the are on cam all the time !!!  

but my point was that atleast the have fun to attempt trying to  have a normal life in rlc apt .

but when poeple visitors making this impossible for them , the have to go .

That is wat I am thinking

[alanohio]

2 hours ago, Noldus said:

2350: Kami went out to see coceboy

Too bad she doesn't get it.

[mr1010]

20 minutes ago, HarleyFatboy said:

Obviously I don't have any of the answers, by the replies that I see for the most part.  The simple solution in my mind is a better screening/casting agent.  Now before you all go off on thinking that I'm referring to them screening the applicants so they get the one's that are going to have sex like N&B or M&S or masturbate in the open like Masha or Zoya.....I'm not saying that at all.   What I am saying though is that when they screen the applicants, I'm sure allot of the questions involve sex and sexual situations....hell, they might even ask them if they masturbate and how often for all I know.   The point is, is that if they do masturbate or have sex it shouldn't be hidden from people that pay good money to see the tenants if that is what the tenants want to do.  In my opinion, under no circumstances should the tenants be allowed to hide from the cameras unless it's a life threatening situation.    Let's say that one of the girls in Barca likes to masturbate allot and she doesn't care if it hair lips every pussy cat in the alley.   At the same time there might be another girl in Barca that might masturbate twice a month and when that time comes she locks herself up in the laundry room or the downstairs bathroom or in the entry way for that matter.   Now you have a girl (the same girl) that allot of people had been wondering if and when it was going to happen, and it finally happens but you don't get to see anything, no facial expressions, no toes curling, no blanket moving, no nothing and I don't feel that is right.   Ahhh never mind, I could go on but it's like talking to a brick wall.   You have your PRO supporters of RLC that are never going to change/agree and then you have me......I'm out numbered so what's the point!!

Harley, as you can see I mostly agree with you. This is a sex voyeur site. The participants know this.

[alanohio]

40 minutes ago, HarleyFatboy said:

Obviously I don't have any of the answers, by the replies that I see for the most part.  The simple solution in my mind is a better screening/casting agent.  Now before you all go off on thinking that I'm referring to them screening the applicants so they get the one's that are going to have sex like N&B or M&S or masturbate in the open like Masha or Zoya.....I'm not saying that at all.   What I am saying though is that when they screen the applicants, I'm sure allot of the questions involve sex and sexual situations....hell, they might even ask them if they masturbate and how often for all I know.   The point is, is that if they do masturbate or have sex it shouldn't be hidden from people that pay good money to see the tenants if that is what the tenants want to do.  In my opinion, under no circumstances should the tenants be allowed to hide from the cameras unless it's a life threatening situation.    Let's say that one of the girls in Barca likes to masturbate allot and she doesn't care if it hair lips every pussy cat in the alley.   At the same time there might be another girl in Barca that might masturbate twice a month and when that time comes she locks herself up in the laundry room or the downstairs bathroom or in the entry way for that matter.   Now you have a girl (the same girl) that allot of people had been wondering if and when it was going to happen, and it finally happens but you don't get to see anything, no facial expressions, no toes curling, no blanket moving, no nothing and I don't feel that is right.   Ahhh never mind, I could go on but it's like talking to a brick wall.   You have your PRO supporters of RLC that are never going to change/agree and then you have me......I'm out numbered so what's the point!!

I agree that the screening process could/should be better. It's also possible they already have a decent process, but what people do once they are in isn't what they said they would do. I think, too, that RLC lets some of these couple get away with almost anything. D&D obviously gets away with everything - God knows why. I do think there should be some lax rules for guests. I still think if I want to visit a friend in an RLC apartment for a party, and I get frisky with someone there, I don't see getting under a blanket as something I shouldn't be allowed to do. This is what's happening with Masha, Sasha, and the Italian girl. The Italian girl isn't a tenant, so she shouldn't have to show anything.

I think you and I Harley, agree on many things, it's just that the things we don't agree on get us riled up LOL

 

Oh, one more thing... We tend to not mention that RLC's idea of what this project is may be totally different than what we think it is...

[HarleyFatboy]

17 minutes ago, alanohio said:

I agree that the screening process could/should be better. It's also possible they already have a decent process, but what people do once they are in isn't what they said they would do. I think, too, that RLC lets some of these couple get away with almost anything. D&D obviously gets away with everything - God knows why. I do think there should be some lax rules for guests. I still think if I want to visit a friend in an RLC apartment for a party, and I get frisky with someone there, I don't see getting under a blanket as something I shouldn't be allowed to do. This is what's happening with Masha, Sasha, and the Italian girl. The Italian girl isn't a tenant, so she shouldn't have to show anything.

I think you and I Harley, agree on many things, it's just that the things we don't agree on get us riled up LOL

 

Oh, one more thing... We tend to not mention that RLC's idea of what this project is may be totally different than what we think it is...

I agree with you on this but I can't help believe that they would condone the hiding,  if so and it continues to happen,  I don't see people continuing to pay to watch it......I could be wrong but it's just how I think!

[Thestarider]

Kami and Kristy are both gone again for the night,,,,,,,As i have watched them since the return from Thailand, it is apparent that they no longer walk the same path through life, but separate journey's.

Kami has the on again off again relationship with Coke Boy, and has spent nearly every single day with him since they returned, Kristy is very busy with her career, and is obviously seeing more of her ex BF as well, thus leaving the apartment void for us viewers. 

The K&K that we remember so fondly from Barcelona simply isn't the K&K in Moscow. Yes we get a brief glimpse of their friendship from time to time, but mostly it is just one of them by them self, or no one in the apartment as the case has been here lately.

Life is journey and they have moved slowly away from each other and onto their own path to follow. I would expect that we will even see less of them as time passes to the future, and they follow their own path's. journey.

I think I now really understand why IRMA was voted most popular and Kami and Kristy fell below the standard, that is because since they have been in Moscow, it just is not what most of the viewer's expected, they were wanting a repeat of Barcelona, and for the extremely close relationship to continue. Like I said we see it from time to time, but it is nothing like it was In Barcelona, nor will it be again. That is why so many think they should go back to Barcelona for the summer, but like I said you likely will never see that again from them. as they have begun to distance themselves from each other, because that is what their life dictates now.

Mikey Season 2 is going to be a failure in most of the viewers eyes.