Ozi

I wasn't going to worry about an avatar, but seeing as Diana chooses to display a Tasmanian Devil on the front of her knickers, how could I not take the hint. Obviously sending me a message when I suggested I would only fit her in for one on one training if I had time.

Never leave a man down, I must come to a fellow Aussie's rescue. Although Russell didn't produce the actual clip, whoever did, can be forgiven for not including the first moon landing, if we are talking of the first manned mission, because that didn't occur until 20 July 1969 and The Real Thing was released in mid March 1969, four months earlier. This version of another The Real Thing, promotes love, peace and harmony, not really my thing, but I'll try anything once.

What, no pictures? Try reading.

Woody that story was doing the rounds, I found it on the internet after I read your post, but there was no source attached to it, repost of a repost of a repost no doubt: Obama just said " Up yours Iowa" Iowa shoved it back.........Governor of Iowa- Hurrah for you, Governor announced: Iowa will not take any illegals kids(most teenagers) in IOWA. Yesterday Obama overruled him and sent him 124 young kids 13-19, landed the plane in Des Moines. Airport manager called the office of the Governor - Bransted, he drove to the airport and chartered from Chicago a plane from United. Within 8 hours all the kids were loaded on, got food and drink. The plane left Iowa 8 o'clock Des Moines. Next stop was Honduras. Plane got unloaded, 4 social workers from Iowa made sure they got to the terminal, told the Honduras officials, here are your kids, they have no papers, you let them come illegal to America. Iowa refuses to take them. Iowa has their own laws. No minors who are not with adults. Iowa has not heard one thing from Washington. READ THIS!: American states are fed up.

Red or white?

Unfortunately Australia didn't learn from your mistakes. The faults of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 were painfully obvious and we chose to ignore them. I thought the current issue being debated had more to do with the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals which I thought was an Obama direction to be lenient on illegal immigrants just because they were minors when they arrived. Great system, we do it here, kids arrive on there own, illegally, we feel sorry for them, give them special treatment, permanent residency status, and then they sponsor the rest of their family who would not otherwise be eligible to enter the country legally. As for illegal minors in Iowa, I can only go by news reports in July this year; During a news conference, Branstad said he was not aware of any of the children currently living in Iowa and that state has not been contacted by the federal government about housing any immigrant children. He said the government’s focus should be on securing the borders.

If 'the governor we are so proud of' was misrepresented in a news article does not detract from his stand on immigration. Yes the law was passed when Bush was in power but if you check the facts, there was no opposition to it, it was a bi-partisan decision pushed by do-gooder groups who have no understanding of the consequences. Giving unaccompanied children special rights and conditions is of no benefit, in fact quite the opposite. Our fucked do-gooder idiots have taken the same stand here in Australia to 'protect the children'. Now, like America, we are being inundated by unaccompanied children, who's parents are more then willing to send them out in unseaworthy boats, risking drowning, as pawns, levers to circumvent the immigration laws. Governor Branstad has at least stood up to these fuck wits and refused to take any of these unaccompanied minors, who now number in the tens of thousands, as well as pushing the government to protect your borders more, something Australia needs to take notice of.

10 hours to catch a kangaroo? I'd have to agree with you on that one. But then again, he is an Aussie, cunning and shifty bastard by nature.

Not wanting to watch a guy masturbate doesn't make me homophobic, it's not my thing. If you swing both ways, good luck with that. But if I'd ever told a girl while she was giving me a blow job that I had shoved the dick she was sucking up some blokes arse, I doubt she would have even finished the blow job let alone continued the relationship.

Fuck off, I'm already getting him into NSW and then on to Prime Minister of Australia. As for who runs the country, I understand the Democrats consider Frederick and Charles Koch un-American, but I've also read they are buying Government with their millions. So if the Democrats hate them I presume they are Republicans, or do they just sit on the fence?

Yep you are right Parasite, I want to see a solution to the problem, not more smart arse answers. Just remind me again, what is the problem? Now I remember, all the armchair quarterbacks and movie directors. tbg is right, that's the real problem. As for a definitive answer as to what is RealLifeCam is all about, why not ask them? Quote: RealLifeCam is a unique website where you have the chance to observe the private life of other people in live round-the-clock. People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship just life as it is 24/7. Yes, the people know about the cameras. Otherwise it would be illegal. You can choose any apartment, click on the cameras to change the view and watch the residents live their lives. The list of available apartments is provided on the left side of the main page and on the right side you will see the drawing of the apartment with indication of the video cameras among which you can choose. The list of the video cameras is also provided beneath the drawing. People living in the apartments are real people leading active way of life. They can be at work, studying, working out in the gym or simply leave to do the shopping.

Out of all the couples I've seen on the rare occasions I can be bothered watching RLC, plus the posts I read on this site, I'm amazed at the negative comments since they've gone on holiday. They are only going for a few days, the house isn't exactly a disaster, what looks like dry cat food to me. As for taking the computer fucking up Alina's holiday? I always take mine when I go away, even for just a few days, which isn't much of a holiday anyway, and my wife never complains. We use it for all sorts of things, like checking plane bookings, checking out hotels, restaurants, none of the things I normally do with it at home. And they do seem to have a fairly active and satisfying sex life, so can't see what the problem is.

Curieux que cela dérange de voir un homme en action. S'il s'agissait de Sofia, ça ne dérangerait pas. J'en connais même qui seraient scotchés devant leur écran et qui inonderaient le post d'images toutes identiques... Où est donc la différence ? It's curious that it bothers to see a man in action. Whether Sofia, it wouldn't. Even, someones here would be taped to their screen and inundate the post of all identical images showing her in action... So where is the difference? :) I would hazard a guess that most, not all, but most members of CC are hot blooded males who are attracted to women and don't want, need or enjoy watching a man masturbate. I certainly don't want to watch a man masturbating, unless he is in the background, way in the background and only just in my peripheral vision, watching a female or females doing the same thing. If you cannot see the difference between watching Roman and Sofia masturbating, then I guess you sexual preferences are totally different to the majority of viewers on CC and the suggestions are coming in that we don't all need to see such an abomination, and I do use that word intentionally, my opinion.

Again? I'll take your word for it. this is real life many men do not touch their wives and masturbate in secret Real Life, really? All men masturbate, doesn't mean I need to see it, so I'll take madwolf's word for it. Make sense?

Again? I'll take your word for it.

I've been giving the theory put forward by 1337nl that RLC is a company and the couples are technically employees. If that is the case, the employees or couples should all have a job description or duty statement. It does appear by the number of complaints, some legitimate and some just whining pre-pubescent teenagers, that the staff are not fulfilling their duties. The solution is simple, it's what I do with my staff, OJT (on the job training). As the couples all have shortfalls in varying areas, group training is out of the question. The alternative of course is one on one and as a qualified workplace trainer and assessor, I am willing to volunteer my time to help out Leora, Maya, Katya and should have time for Diana. One on one is my specialty and I don't think I would need more than a dozen or so private sessions with each of the girls to get them qualified. To maintain the workplace trainer and assessor quals, you are required to complete annual professional development training, so I could balance this out by letting Alina deliver some one on one training to me. I have to do a minimum of 20 hours per annum, so one session a month should cover it. I have hit one snag, to benefit, all parties need to receive training. This is purely voluntary, but I do need people to work with Paul, Stepan and Ruslan. How you deliver the training is up to you, I'm sure I still have a very good manual called Wall to Wall Counselling in my old army trunk you could borrow. The army banned it because the medical centre couldn't keep up with the recruits turning up at sick parade every morning and the number of broken limbs and cases of concussion were starting to raise questions up the chain of command. Anyway, if 1337nl is right, it would be worth buying shares in RLC now while they are cheap, because in 6 to 12 months, the thing should start to boom!

Oh right, they've been doing such a good job of all those things so far that it should have been so obvious.

And this statement is based on what?

and a big revolving door.

You talk about danger! Do you realize that a strange man could make his way into that apartment while Paul was away at camp one day, throw a pillow case over that poor girls head and rape her, and not a one of us could even serve as a good witness, though thousands had been watching the whole thing. Police asking me to describe the assailant: "How the fuck should I know what he looked like, it would be like trying to read a newspaper under water, with that fucked up camera they have there!" "Oh wait officer, maybe this will help." "He was sort of fuzzy looking, you know,.. with all of his features like his nose and his eyes and his mouth just sort of blending and melding together while swirling about, kind of like a marble cake batter appears like when your mixing it up in a bowl." "Does that help you?" "Sorry I wasn't more of a help to you officer,.. But I did once see the face of Mohamed grimacing on a slice of buttered toast once a few days back." "It was quite unsettling, and unnerved me a lot!" What you need is practice.

Literary - concerning the writing, study, or content of literature, especially of the kind valued for quality of form, such as "the great literary works of the nineteenth century". This would suggest culture. Australians are cultured.

"Why so serious?" Oops, sorry tbg.

It's official, I have just had Governor Bransted made an Honorary Australian. Now if I can just organise a political coup in the state of New South Wales, I'll get him elected Premier.

Yep, after I read his post and checked it out I thought tbg was right. But then I thought, hang on a minute, this is Paul we are talking about here, another woman?

As is usual it takes an Aussie to get the priorities right!