Part of the problem, maybe a lot of the problem, IDK, is we may have been
lulled into believing, thanks to the low quality cams in use at VH, that this
pic is sharp. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
Certainly, it's better than some we see posted, thanks to the adequate
lighting in the room. But, compare it to the second pic and you begin to
see what sharp is. (View them at actual size, which is 2453 x 1371, and
in separate windows (not separate tabs), so you can switch back and
forth between the two. You can better see the difference that way. It's
the same pic.)
Compare things around the room, like the print on the pillows, the square
thing on the window sill, the reflections in the mirrors, her hair, etc.
Here's another example. In the original, you can barely tell the redhead
has wrinkles on her forehead, or the separation between her nipple and
areola (they blend together like one, dark blob) or the pattern on the front
of her panties. It looks as though someone put a soft-focus filter over
the camera lens compared to the other two images. Also, the same pic.
(BTW, a friend from across the pond got me thinking that possibly not
everyone knows how to view pics, GIFs, etc., at full, actual size within the
CC system. If anyone needs that info, let me know.)