letsdothis

Yay!!!! Irma's back!!!!! 👍👍

I just liked the pretty lights. Don't you mean 20 quid? Or, would you rather have a monkey? 😉

Oh, Budda, Budda, Budda.

Ha Ha Ha! My Grandmother would have called that going all the way around the barn to get to the front door of the farmhouse. 🤣🤣🤣

You have lost me completely.

Thanks. Right back at you. Hope you had a rousing celebration! 😊

Ah, now I get it. Thanks. Happy New Year. 👍😊

│ │ If you go through the various Member's comments, you can easily found many comments similar to mine. │ @budda, I never singled you out, called you by name or mentioned you specifically in my original post. As I've said at least twice, my post was a general comment aimed at everyone who makes the same comments repeatedly. The only reason I'm talking about you now, is because you replied to my post. │ │ Melissa and Sergio - like all the other tenants - freely decided to enter this program to have sex on payment. │ Melissa & Sergio may have decided to join this project of their own free will, but it was not to have sex on payment. It was to live their lives on camera. Did they know they would be having sex on camera? Of course, it;s part of their lives, but they didn't join to be paid for sex. │ │ They also quickly learned that the more varied their sex, the more money they earn. │ This may be true, but if they choose not to increase or vary their sexual activities. that's up to them, not us. │ │ ... many people are willing to pay $ 40 / month just to see the tenants having sex │ This may be true for you, but many have said it's not just about the sex for them. │ │ the Tenants are actors - paid by us - who play the role expected by the spectators. │ You keep insisting that the tenants must do your bidding simply because their income is derived from the subscription fees. Nothing could be further from the truth. What they do on the other side of the camera lens is totally up to them, not anyone on this side of the camera. As I've said before, you only pay for a view into the apartments, nothing more. You certainly don't pay them to have sex or to do it in the way or as much as you wish or expect or request or demand. │ │ I certainly can't say: Hey, Melissa, stop using the phone and try to have more sex. │ Well, you could, but it probably wouldn't work any better than what you've already tried. Something else to think about, that I've also said before. What you're doing doesn't go over too well some of the other users on this forum, as you've found out. So, why would you want to set yourself up for ridicule? I certainly hope we can finally put this issue to bed. I'm getting tired of saying the same things over and over, again.

Unfortunately not, it has to be an attachment.

@SPYING 1, they were very cool. Thanks for the education. 👍👍

Ha Ha Ha!!! That's a new one on me. I never knew you could set an SOS pad on fire. Wish I had known about that when I was a kid. I love fire and fireworks. This one of my favorite fireworks videos. World's Largest Singe Fireworks Shell.webm

If you notice the 3 photos when i put the list, all was grabbed on same moment and it's totally different the light from the two cams near the bed and this one. That's why I said that. In the picture I quoted, the lights look yellow. Mixed with whatever blue is in the room, it gives a greenish tint to the room. If those yellow lights are supposed to be blue, then maybe the color balance is off in the cam at the foot of the bed. But, I fixed them.

It looks greenish to me. Yellow and blue make green.

I HOPE EVERYONE HAS/HAD A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR

Like I said, you always keep me laughing! 🤣🤣🤣

I got this when I translated it. Roads smooth as newly shaved mouse: - Danger of being blown off Is that because "mouse" means something other than a small rodent in Norwegian? 😊

It's 1325, now.

As I said to Budda, I didn't invent this rule. It's been around for ages. Read my post to him. Whether you agree or not it doesn't change.

No, it doesn't mean that...if you had said it once or twice. But, when you repeat the same thing over and over, especially for weeks and weeks, you make it clear that you want a change to occur. In your case, you're saying that you want Melissa to stop using her phone the way she uses it because you don't like it. It doesn't matter how you say it, you're using repetition to try to change her behavior. I didn't make up this rule. It's been stated many times by other people. It doesn't matter what you want or expect to see when you subscribe. What you're paying for is the right to see what happens in the apartments. That's all, nothing else. It doesn't include trying to change their behavior by whatever means you use to try and change it. It's up to the tenants to choose what they want to do to entertain us. It's not for us to decide. If they don't get the views they need to make enough money, then they either make a choice to do something different or they leave the project. But, it's their choice. It's not up to us. As I said before, if a tenant changes what they do to suit one person's desires, they may be disappointing many other viewers and their income could suffer as a result. Remember, there are many more viewers than just those who post on CC.

Yes, that was precisely my point. Subs don't buy the right to direct the lives of the tenants, just a view through the cams. I didn't poke at anyone specifically. I was speaking in general terms about everyone who posts the same thing repetitively.

Yes, you could do that, but that wouldn't be quite the point. Melissa has the right to do whatever the hell she wants to do with her life because it's just that, her life. Subs and other viewers also have a right; the right to watch what she and others decide to do. And that's it, period. You've said it yourself: A sub buys you a view through the cams. It doesn't give us the right to direct the lives of the tenants. We have no right to coax badger, cajole, intimidate, manipulate, suggest, encourage, persuade, prod, insinuate, needle, verbally attack, convince, induce, incite, influence, urge, advise or in any other way, direct the lives of the tenants. And it doesn't matter what behavior you use. Whether you come right out and say, "Don't do that, do this instead," or you gently insinuate you would prefer to see them do something different. Directing is directing. I don't think he was speaking literally. It was an opposing opinion made to illustrate what other viewers might like to see. He did say "hypothetically." But, he makes a good point. Why should a tenant change their behavior to suit the desires of one person, when they may already be doing what 100 other viewers prefer? That's one reason why we don't have the right to direct the lives of the tenants. If they start doing or not doing what that one person wants, they may displease 100 others. Then where would their "views" be? To quote a rather well-known Star Trek character, "The needs of the few do not outweigh the needs of the many." Or, something like that. And I agree, we all have the right to express our opinions, within the rules of the forum. And we can even repeat the same opinion ad infinitum, ad nauseam. But, why on Earth would you want to do that? Why would you choose to annoy and aggravate and irritate, offend, pester, etc., and provoke the ire of your fellow viewers in this community? Why would you want to generally get on other peoples' nerves? That's more like the behavior exhibited by trolls.