letsdothis

Happy Birthday, Stas. Hope there's a party for you. Do you mind if we ask how old you are? 🎈🎈🎈

If RLC content is uploaded to the Internet, there's always a problem with the DMCA. RLC is like a ravenous dog with a bone when it comes to taking down their content from anywhere on the Internet. They are relentless when it comes to protecting their copyright. Do they miss a file here or there? Maybe, but it would be extremely rare. I think it would be a safe bet that virtually all of their content that's uploaded to the Internet gets taken down within a day or two. I've seen files get deleted in less than three hours. If you have any RLC files still on file.fm's servers after a day or two, I would be amazed. I hope you do because it would mean you've found the holy grail of hosts for RLC content.

Not after RLC sics the DMCA on them. We'll be lucky if it lasts a day. The DMCA always trumps whatever the host site says is the expiration date. The DMCA is the law they all must abide by.

HaHaHa!!! Maybe someone should stay in the bathroom next time.

Damn, Moll! Excellent! Great cap, Sparkles! 👍👍👍

Yeah, that would be a buzzkill for sure! 😂😂😂

That was funny as hell! 😂😂😂

Or, it could just be good acting skills. Or, it might just be the wrong verb. I mean did he literally drag her along the floor to a place off camera? If not, then maybe there's a better verb that could be used. We have no way of knowing for sure because no one could see everything that happened or what or how those sounds were made. I don't, at all, doubt the description of the incident given by Rob or CHAZ, or how they felt about what happened. But, you said it yourself, sounds can be deceiving and I agree 100%. You also said in another topic, if you can't see the sex, it didn't happen. But, here you're saying that if you can only hear something that maybe sounds like it might possibly be a beating, then it must be a beating. I think most people might call that a double standard. I think the apt was taken offline because that's what VH does when violence is suspected, while they perform an investigation. What were their findings? Did they get fined? Was there really any violence that took place? I believe you've said yourself, drama creates views. I would say that's true even if it might be fake drama. It certainly creates conversation. 😊

Well, since you asked, bigger pics would be great, but only if you can. Especially when they're this good. 😊 Something like this would be really great.

God forbid that I would ever say that you, or anyone, can't make your own decision or have your own opinion. I simply said you can't make an accurate, informed decision, especially about something this serious, if. you. didn't. see. it. Sounds can easily be misinterpreted and made to sound like something they aren't. I do have one question, though. Who is this "OP" you keep talking about? Thanks.

I couldn't find an "OP" anywhere. It was Chazr13 who first said, "...he dragged her off cam and beat her" (bottom of page 13). That was the very first post about the incident. Sure, if a bear shits in the woods it will stink, even though you probably wouldn't ever see it. And, if you don't see it, how do you know it was bear shit? 😊 Just saying, there's a lot of assumptions, conjecture, speculation and guesswork going on here and it's not fair to kill off an apt as a result. Things are not always what they seem to be - or, in this case, what they sound like.

While I was writing my last post, you posted this one, but I didn't see it until after I had submitted mine.

Rob's actual words were: "that was some serious incident by the sound of it. This is why it is becoming vital that every part of every apartment is covered by cams as in this apartment there appears to be a big area uncovered." Then, in answer to your question: "So it was outside of the cam view?" He said: "Yes but the slaps or thumps were very plainly heard and sounded very hard..." Nowhere did Rob say, "...he dragged her off cam and beat her." Someone else said that. The point being, it was off cam and no one witnessed it because it couldn't be seen by anyone.

(Purged)

(Purged)

(Purged)

(Purged)

(Purged)

(Purged)

Using the "+" to quote is called multi-quoting and you can use it to do a variety of things, such as, To quote multiple posts at once, either in the current topic, or To copy one or more posts to a completely different topic and reply to them there, although you can't multi-quote a post into a PM, or Say you're several pages behind in reading the new posts in a topic and you find a question you want to reply to, but not until you've read all the new posts, in case someone has already answered the question. You can click the "+" to carry that post forward to the end of the topic and reply or not after you've read all the newer posts. That way, you don't have to go back and search for it later. A caveat: Whenever you click on a "+", it stays in "focus", so if you hit the spacebar to scroll or the Enter key, for example, the multi-quote box in the bottom right corner will disappear or be decreased by one if you've already clicked more than one "+", although you can get it right back again by hitting the spacebar or Enter key again before you click someplace else. For this reason, always click on a neutral area in the topic after you click a "+" to make it lose "focus". Also, after a topic is locked, as Stone said, you won't be able to quote any posts from that topic, but you can copy and paste any post you want into an active topic and reply to it there (see example 1 below). There is a catch to this method, however. It won't notify the user that you've quoted his post from a locked topic, so you'll need to mention his username in the reply, such as @WatcherCC, so he gets a notification that you quoted his post. On the other hand, if you copy and paste from a locked topic, such as in the second example below, it may notify any user whose username is already in the copied text. I'm not sure about this one. You can give a try and see what happens. I hope this is helpful. _____________________ Example 1 I didn't realize you opened the "Voyeur-House.TV (2019) Part #1" topic. Once I noticed this I moved the question above to the topic you started so this topic ("Voyeur-House.TV - Part 4") can now be erased. Thanks. _____________________ Example 2 It's easy to reply to a comment in a Locked Topic. There's a (+) to the left of where the Quote Button was. Clicking the (+) will carry the Quote. When you get to the New Topic in the Bottom Right Corner of the Screen will show there is a Quote. Place the Curser in the comment box then click the Notification in the Bottom Right Corner and the Quote from the Locked Topic will appear in the Comment Box then just leave your response Under the Quote placed.

Clara, Stas, you have no idea how much I was hoping not to hear those words. I am so very sorry for your loss. I know it doesn't take long to become quite attached to such a loving pet as Musi and that decision must have been terrible for you to make. It makes me very sad, as well. My heart goes out to you both.

I haven't seen much of Musi lately. Is she OK?

But, even what he said was just conjecture based only on what he could hear. No one ever actually saw anything that happened.

For anyone to draw any conclusions about what happened during this incident, they're doing so based on inconclusive evidence. We have no way of knowing, definitively, what happened when they were off camera. All we have to go on are some noises. For all we know, someone could have been clapping their hands together. Or, it could have all been an act. We just don't know and we most likely will never know for sure. But, to draw any kind of definite conclusion based on the known facts, is nothing but complete conjecture and speculation. There is simply not enough conclusive evidence. In other words, to put it in layman's terms, it's nothing but pure guesswork. I'm not saying he didn't hit her, just that we have no way of knowing absolutely. There's a rule of law in the US and I'm sure in many other countries, as well. It states that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. I think, in this case, we need to err on the side of caution and give him the benefit of the doubt since we cannot prove anything definitively. JM2¢.

That's $20/year to be a Premium Member of CC. 😊 However, you can't use the Attachment Tool to post pictures in this forum. Hopefully, that will change, but not yet.