Thestarider

Here is the truth about your Buyers remorse, not the Fantasy you and the liberal radicals have bought into. Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire Politico article The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found. So I guess we now know who really colluded with the soviet block don't we ? Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country. Ukraine Guilty Of Interfering In 2016 Election To Help Hillary Ukraine interfered with 2016 election to help Hillary - coordinated with DNC operative Foreign meddling is bad. Point out the inarguable fact that Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate, and they respond "Russians." Remind them of her supreme arrogance and overconfidence, and they respond "Russians." Show them that Hillary ignored the rust belt in favor of spiking the football in Arizona, and they respond "Russians." Tell them that she squashed her own voters' enthusiasm by cheating Bernie, and they respond "Russians." Since Hillary is so wonderful, there's no way she could have lost - especially not to a man like Donald Trump. Democrats need a scapegoat and "Russians" are their most reliable boogeyman. Trump, the GOP, the media, everyone, colluded with the ruskies to "hack the election" and destroy poor, sweet, innocent, Hillary Clinton. As you're no doubt aware, this kind of collusion makes Trump unfit for the presidency. He should resign or something. Possibly, he should be in jail. Hillary's team would NEVER do something like tha- ...uh oh. As the Politico reports, Hillary had her own squad of foreign interlopers. Thank you Mrs. Clinton and Mr President Obama The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.” The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain. But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one. At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One. No Fantasy Here, just plain Facts Eagle.

Since when is Helen praying, and others who have been in the apartments praying outside the thread rules, We mods will determine what is off topic and what is not.

And the countdown begins T-minus 10, 9, 8 for the princess known as Our Lady of Tents

Agreed, ed2 it doesn't change the fact that 84 percent of worlds population believes, in science and religion..... So when one these girls prays, so when one of the tenants which there are many of them over years prays it because they have faith, and should not be put down in anyway because they believe in their faith. without faith where would this world be ?

Maybe they are praying for forgiveness for they not what they do, But it is happening on the screen before us in the apartment, so I find nothing against the rules of discussion about this topic.

This is a conversation about Helen and Anna praying as well as several other tenants who have prayed and wear a cross around their necks, so I find it acceptable.

You must be one of the minority or Atheist 84 percent of the world population has faith; a third are Christian .........Fairytales Huh ? All Life has rules to live by ed2. 6.174 billion people are all fucked up in the head then you would have us believe ed2 ? Keep up with your prayers Helen and continue to pray for your son and his good health before you go to bed.

Seems really strange that she is taking a trip before highly touted performance in the Russian Hamlet in a week, I guess she is so good she needs not any rehearsal time LMAO Good Bye Kami, Good Bye Kami, were so glad to see you go. Yes Yes Hello Angels, Yes Yes Hello Angels, Now is the time for your stars to shine while miserable one is away again .

Kamilla's Motto

And the winner is : Tent Time with Sophie

Life is good, good friends, great food, intellectual conversations, Pure Happiness

Or should I say it is "Our Lady of Tent Time" T-minus 10 and counting LMAO

Jabbath everything with that conversation has been removed from the thread when sr71gn was banned

Well are you not the diplomatic one ?

What is this about again? Masturbating with out covers? Really? As soon as that happens this place will go bananas but then it will fade. Kamila is the most interesting person on the site. BTW Patriarch is a male description. Maybe Matriarch. Anyway what's with your personal vitriol with her I may ask? It is a little weird. Kenny what is your infatuation with her, I think that is quite weird.. why does it always have to be about masturbation ? How about being lazy and sleeping until 3 or 4 in the afternoon ? How about the never ending frown on her face ? How about how shitty she treats the Angels who brought real excitement to the Penthouse ? What about her boring ass friends compared to Kristy's real friends who have real fun? Truth be known Kami is a real failure for RLC compared to Kristy, in all aspects of voyeurism. Isn't that why we pay the money to RLC for the privilege of voyeurism ? I guess if you want to watch someone in bed until mid afternoon Hell man there are many CC members who agree with me. the many polls over the last couple years show that. and you and few who still think her shit doesn't stink are in the minority now. It is time to for her to go where she is happy because sure as hell is not on RLC. BTW: pa·tri·arch a person or thing that is regarded as the founder of something the oldest member or representative of a group patriarch depends on what context you use the word.

My hometown... a very good article about Americas heartland. and why President is just that the President. Where big-government conservatism rules The birthplace of populism supports President Trump’s policy of lower taxes with more protection Jul 1st 2017 THE PLAINS OF south-west Kansas are so flat that, looking towards the horizon, it sometimes seems possible to detect the curvature of the Earth. This is a place of mile-long freight trains, cathedral-like grain silos, occasional tornadoes and homages to “The Wizard of Oz”. The town of Liberal is said to have been named for an early settler famous among travellers for being free with drinking water. Liberal is conservative in a moderate Midwestern kind of way. It is also changing fast. Its big National Beef Packing plant relies on Hispanic migrants. Four-fifths of the children in Liberal’s public-school system are Hispanic. This should make the town receptive to Democrats, but Mr Trump easily won the county of which it forms part. Liberal’s mayor, Joe Denoyer, is a disc jockey at the local radio station, playing country music and taking calls from listeners in the morning, then hanging up his headphones to sell advertising in the afternoon. He was raised in a Democratic family near Chicago and moved to Liberal in search of work. Asked about his political conversion, he recalls being impressed when Ronald Reagan joked about an assassination attempt on him, and later told Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down that wall”. Mr Denoyer voted for Mr Trump, though he thinks it unlikely that the president will keep his promises. Being mayor means getting into the weeds of local politics: halfway through the interview at the station his boss wanders in and complains that the city has incorrectly served a notice to clear some overgrown grass in an alleyway near his house; Mr Denoyer says he will look into it. Kansas’s plains have played a big part in America’s political history. In 1891 members of the Kansas Farmers’ Alliance supposedly coined the term “populist” to describe their movement. In the presidential election in 1892 the candidate of the People’s Party carried five states from a standing start, on a platform of support for farmers and abandoning the gold standard. There was a nativist streak to its ideas: Mary Elizabeth Lease, a Kansas populist and suffragette, warned about a “tide of Mongols” invading America. Though the party contained strains of anti-Semitism and racism, writes John Judis in “The Populist Explosion”, these were secondary. The core of its appeal was an anti-elitism that has been part of Midwestern politics ever since. The People’s Party was later incorporated into the Democratic Party. A little over a century on, Kansas populism had changed again. In 2004 Thomas Frank lamented in “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” that the leftish populism of Lease and her ilk had been replaced by a rightish sort. Republicans, he argued, had managed to bamboozle his home state, selling voters economic policies that were not to their advantage by wrapping them up in emotive messages about abortion and guns. Kathy Cramer puts the question more succinctly in “The Politics of Resentment”: why would someone without teeth not support government-funded dental care? Her interviewees farther north, in Wisconsin, provided the answer: “The government must be mishandling my hard-earned dollars, because my taxes keep going up and clearly they are not coming back to benefit people like me. So why would I want an expansion of government?” A wetter version of Texas Kansas’s current governor, Sam Brownback, has run with this kind of thinking. When he took office in 2011, promising to turn the state into a wetter version of Texas, with no state income tax and lots of incentives for businesses to move there, the Kansas Speaks survey run by Fort Hays State University showed that voters were keen on the idea. Since then the tax cuts have failed to produce the hoped-for economic miracle; instead, the government has repeatedly missed its revenue targets and services have been cut (the Republican-controlled state legislature voted to roll back the tax cuts in early June). The Kansas Speaks poll suggests that but for Chris Christie in New Jersey, Governor Brownback would be the nation’s least popular governor. It also shows that a majority now favour tax rises, and that most Kansans think their own taxes went up after the state cut income tax. When voters get what they thought they wanted, they do not always like it. Advertisement: Replay Ad Advertisement 3 Mr Trump’s approval rating is more than twice that of Governor Brownback’s in Kansas. One reason is that he talks of more protection for his voters but without proposing tax increases. A consistent finding in the General Social Survey is that people favour tax cuts but like increased government spending even more. On the campaign trail, the president denied there was a trade-off, insisting that people can have lower taxes without cuts to social security (pensions) or Medicare (health care for the elderly); and a pro-business administration that will also prevent companies from moving jobs overseas. When researching a book on Tea Party activists in 2010, Theda Skocpol of Harvard University found that many wanted just this combination but ended up voting for shrink-the-government conservatives. Many of these activists already had a favourable impression of Mr Trump, who was then telling anyone who would listen that Barack Obama was not born in America. “The promise of social insurance for white people plus restrictions on trade and immigration is very appealing,” says Ms Skocpol. “It is not a mixture that has been on offer before.” For all Mr Trump’s railing against NAFTA, trade provokes less visceral feelings than immigration; a lot of voters say they do not know whether they favour more restrictions on imports. But there is a heartfelt nativist streak in support for Mr Trump, just as there was when 19th-century populists were denouncing the Mongol invasion. The share of people living in America who were born abroad reached 15% in 1890, then declined after restrictions were imposed on immigration in the 1920s, to a low of 5% in 1970. Since then it has risen again, reaching 13% in 2010. Many of the president’s supporters feel that such people are not proper Americans; 63% of Trump voters said that to be truly American it was either very or fairly important to have been born in the country (42% of Clinton voters thought the same). One reason may be that voters failed to distinguish between Hispanics and illegal immigrants, a distinction the president has blurred. Since assuming office, the president has continued to condemn illegal immigration, but also sometimes seemed to extend a welcome to the legal sort. His White House is split on this: some advisers would halt legal immigration too. Mr Buckley, the law professor and speechwriter (and himself an immigrant from Canada), thinks that the president should copy the immigration law of 1924, which handed out citizenship to newcomers in proportion to the country’s existing racial make-up (which in practice meant giving preference to northern Europeans). Mr Buckley reasons that having a boardroom or a cabinet that reflects the country’s ethnic make-up is generally held to be a good thing, so why not apply the same logic to immigration quotas? Democrats resist such thinking as racially motivated, but they are in a bind. The long progressive consensus that started with the New Deal in the 1930s and lasted until the mid-1960s coincided precisely with the most restrictive immigration laws in the country’s history. There is a tension between immigration and redistribution that the party has yet to resolve. Republicans in Liberal argue that the melting pot is working well there. The bakery sells creamy quinceanera cakes; the newcomers seem to like the annual Ozfest (past participants include Judy Garland’s stand-in and a smattering of munchkins). Citizenship classes at the community college are oversubscribed. This strain in the Republican Party is being squashed by a White House partly staffed by Californians desperate to prevent the kind of ethnic change that swept through their home state from spreading to the rest of the country. Stephen Bannon, Mr Trump’s chief strategist, who worked in Hollywood for a while, once said that the defeat of a bill in Congress that would have given illegal immigrants without a criminal record a path to citizenship was an achievement comparable to the passage of the Civil Rights Act. The stop-America-from-becoming-California movement is a window onto a more general truth. In addition to the divides on education, and between cities and countryside, American politics has become polarised along ethnic lines.

She has already become a lonely old maid on CC..... very few follow her anymore ....Too bad for such an incredibly beautiful sexual sensual woman who has no real intestinal fortitude to discover her real desires and fantasies.......sad really when you think about it. Suppose to be the patriarch of Moscow and Barcelona and she is no more than a has been on RLC.. Bring on the ANGELS the viewers are sick and tired of this high school girl stuff and ready for real voyeur temptation, not this teasing stuff from days gone by in Barcelona ...... Thank goodness for Kristy who should be the patriarch of Moscow as she carries the Moscow Penthouse on her shoulders, Kristy has really grown over the past couple years and made the membership absolutely love her.

It is really hard to come up with just 20 places in the poll as the membership has spoken with over 30 different girls

We have several female members who post regularly on CC, I would like to know who you think is most awesome woman on CC Ladies please take no offense to the poll, as it is just for fun. Please if I have missed anyone respond and you will be added to the poll

A new poll has been created, So please go vote

WHY Kami ? 2 years or longer your fan base has been following you, isn't about time to give something back ??? The thing about a challenge is whether you can accept it. and whether you can prove the naysayers wrong.???' Kristy has proved the naysayers wrong, Hiedi has proved the naysayers wrong, the question is can Kami prove the naysayers wrong ??? We wait and we watch

Kami can't as Ihave always said. Exhibitionism is all about being caught completely exposed. Kami is just a teaser, and will never be a pleaser. A voyeur's dream she is without question. Extremely beautiful with an awesome figure. She has let her star fade to point that it barely shines now, because she is afraid to grow and change, and to give into her real desires

OK SOPHIE you have earned your merit badge OUR LADY OF TENTS

Rule 4 applies here gentlemen, please stay on topic as this thread has nothing to with US politics ! 4) Treat Moderators and their requests with respect. Or else Islama Obama and Trump Twat posts belong in the political threads guys, Lets try to stick to the topic at hand, as the mods have to move these posts to the political thread during the nightly clean up. We appreciate your help.