miscvoyeur

Resorting to the "he needs pussy" shaming tactics is the laziest and uninspired attempt at trying to insult someone. It's not even a real insult.

Hmm, you think maybe they can be in the bedroom? Or in a room that doesn't have a free cam?

I don't hate rlc enough to shit on them when it's not called for nor do I like rlc enough to blindly stick up for them like a sheep. I have the same opinion about VH, VV, and Camarads. I'm only interested in factual statements and what mic said about rlc caring about everyone's sub is just factually not true. That's the only point I was trying to make regarding his statement. Ultimately, I think RLC are a bunch of money grubbing cunts who as you said, don't care too much about their members. Charging your "premium" members separately for the replay feature is proof of that, but on the flip side, people have no problem spending the money on it so what else is there to say? I'm not particularly a fan of VH but if someone says something not true about them I'll debate the inaccurate statement just I like I did with mic's rlc statement.

No. They don't. If they did, they would have allowed people to post videos and pics of the tenants since it's literally the one thing most of the people here have been doing for almost a decade. And yet, they are still #1. They still afford to have the best houses/apartments out of the bunch and have the absolute best cam quality and streaming out of the bunch. So... There's no where that says a person can't be happy with both sites. I agree with bean when he says people here fucking LOVE to talk as if they speak for everyone, and people love to think that their opinion about a couple or a site as a whole is somehow indicative of every member who subs to that site. And while people here have the right to complain about whatever they want, when all a person does is bitch and whine and nag about every trivial thing that comes to their head, it makes them and their opinions as a whole mean nothing but shit and shows that they shouldn't be taken at all seriously. And having the right to complain about whatever you want doesn't mean people don't have the right to call some of those complaints out on the bullshit they are if someone or a group of someones believes those complaints are in fact bullshit.

Basically.

Tenants would be foolish not to have some kind of job while living here.

Same. I never saw the appeal for her physically. She's down to do almost anything sexual which is cool and she comes off as a nice person most of the time even though from my translations she can come off pretty fucking mean when she wants to, but I never really cared to watch her do the sexual things, even during her VV days.

Licking a girl's pussy after another dude just had his dick in there. Disgusting.

But "good porn" is not the point of a voyeur site. Porn by definition is NOT voyeurism.

Thinking she is somehow blocking action... as if she's putting her foot down and saying "you're not allowed to do anything sexual at all..." Like I said, some people look for any reason to complain about nothing, even if it's the most ridiculous thing they can think of.

No you shouldn't.

News according to AlexLina and VH... so you'll understand if I choose to take their word over yours.

Josh was also a thief that was plotting to steal equipment... or did you just happen to forget to mention that? Also according to Groomy they had the lowest rating, so they really weren't as interesting as you want to think they are.

Who says VH is the one staging card games?

If I added my RLC collection then I suppose I would be in the same situation. But I don't ever watch my RLC stuff. Out of the hundreds of RLC vids I have only a handful are worth watching.

I only took the same amount of time out of my life that you did out of yours to respond to me.

Just because you have a problem with it doesn't mean other people will care. Some people don't care one way or another about people having sex in the dark.

Except here are the two faults with this. A couple like Chloe and James will never be able to "compete" with a couple like Anna and Alex, since by definition this model does nothing but promote unnecessary competition. And doing this puts more strain on a couple to try to keep attention than it needs to. You can't advertise real life if the couples aren't acting real but instead acting in a way to keep attention. It turns all apartments into fake wanna game shows... which is fine if that's what you want to do, but you can't have it both ways. You either have real couples living real lives or you have couples duking it out for attention everyday. Couples shouldn't have to "work". They should have the freedom to be as natural as they are. Once their activities, whether it be sex or anything else, is seen as work then they become nothing more than dime-a-dozen porn stars. Granted that the key is to find naturally uninhibited people/couples to where their activities, whether it be sex or anything else, are things they want to do for THEMSELVES only. Getting these young, -presumably- inexperienced and financially unstable kids (meant in the figurative sense) in a house and then put the responsibility on them to be consistently interesting for the world, and all for the good chance of a laughable paycheck just seems a little off. Of course this is just my two cents. I have no dog in this fight either way. Obviously others will disagree, but whatever. I'm just speaking my piece.

If you could see my video collection, it's only one or two vids per couple. The only exception is Sara and Jeka. I think I have about 5 or 6 with them. And some couples are so lame as a whole I don't even bother with a single video of them.

Anyone that reads the descriptions of the tenants and couples by VH, they are always worded in a way to make them sound more interesting than they actually are. It's all fluff and not to be taken seriously. Even some of their tweets are comically over exaggerated.

That has always been an issue with a number of tenants, and not just here on this site. Some people are almost like hermits in that they have no social life or any interaction with people other than with themselves. Even if they want to stay in a committed monogamous relationship, that can be acceptable if they at least had friends come to visit. Maybe the friend of one couple and the friend of another couple might hit it off. That can be something interesting. The last time they had any sort of social gathering involving new people it didn't turn out so well, but that shouldn't be a deterrent for having future parties with outside guests.

Again, it's not about them fucking everyone. But the interest of watching them flirt with each other and hook up with each other and having to deal with new people for the first time is what it's all about. I don't care if they fuck. Some will and some won't. Couples will form and break up and have more inclined to get with new people. It won't always be so static and formulated like it is now.

It's not about how many times people fuck. I don't care if they were sex maniacs or not. There's only so much people are going to see when you're dealing with couples that only want to fuck each other and not want to fuck other people. To be perfectly honest, I can't watch the same two people fuck more than 2 or 3 times

The compound was a good idea, just executed poorly with this current cast of tenants. They were better off getting new people to live here rather the forcing the existing couples to live together.

The intrigue of the relationship between her and the 2nd guy has my interest.