philo

Masha may be partially responsible for sponsoring P&T to become featured on RLC. I can recall when they first visited Mashas' apartment as guest some time ago.

This could get very interesting with Masa there.

Irma (and perhaps Leora) are the only people who represents stability and constancy on RLC. Irma represents the same "value added" element to RLC that Nora once did. (If you don't know who Nora is then you are too new to RLC to even offer a criticism of Irma.) I understand why some people, of another generation, will have no interest in Irma and could care less about values like "institutional legacy" since they are only looking for a new face to beat off to. Their ignorance can only be corrected by time, and if they are lucky, a bit of wisdom .

I love it when you come to speak truth.

This is the only thread where the gatekeepers brag about watching a vacant bed for hours on end so that Leora can remain on top of the thumbnail ranking. I guess we should refer to her now as Nurse Leora due to her work at the Covid Clinic? Is it true that the reason Leora has been away for so long is that she has been given an award for curing two of her patients of Priapism?

One of my favorite Irma sessions to watch that is somewhat comparable to Leora and Malia is her session with Danaya where she was the reluctant one like Leora and Irma was more the aggressor like Malia. During a 48 minute session, Irma used only her tits and tongue to fuck Danaya into a state of pure bliss. A part of Irma's reputation is that she was always the giver of orgasms to the other girls. The exception was with Stella who was the only girl who gave Irma an orgasm. Like Irma, Malia is the only one whom I have ever seen to get Leora to come. With Paul, Leora mostly got herself off after Paul's three minutes of fame were done. RLC would do well by requiring the newbies to study some of the classic footage. By comparison, it would help the current Leora trolls to understand how much has been lost.

To the Leora trolls who think they are being cute by making fun of anyone's interest in Irma...you have no idea how such attempts does nothing but reveal your stupidity! I just watched several clips of Irma from my archives from her first, second, third and fourth tours in B1. Compared with ANYTHING that Leora has ever produced is a joke. It's like saying that in boxing that Alexander Povetking is a great fighter; or that in Nascar, Kyle Busch is a great driver. These statements can only be made by people who never saw Ali or Leonard in boxing; or who ever saw Junior Johnson, Fireball Roberts, Awesome Bill from Dawsonville or Richard Petty in Nascar. The statement is, on its face, stupid. People who never saw Irma and Stella, Irma and Danaya, or even Irma and Nora, have absolutely no basis for comparison. (Sorry that you don't have an archive to refer to). But there are still many people on this forum who can recall those moments. So you guys who want to compare any semblance of what Leora and Malia do to anything from RLC past are making yourselves look stupid without even knowing it. You guys who are happy with spending hours watching cameras #8,9,10 and 11, with nothing more than an empty bed or a garishly pink bed spread can go right ahead. "Ignorance is bliss".

Even though the Jerk had a bad debut, it looks like Leora is going to run this script regardless. I kept watching hoping that I was wrong and that the Jerk was with Malia as the fan club stated. I was hoping there was the new guy that Leora told Malia about at the breakfast table... who lived with his mother (as was translated by a fellow forum member). It looks like there is only one guy after all and Leora seems to be using Malia as a decoy. I said before, they are all full of bullshit. I can't figure out why the need for the bullshit unless it's for the purpose of confusing that dumbass Paul. I'm done with bullshit so I'm out too. Peace.

As I have also said, Malia is no more than click bate for Leora, just like other apartments who have pets to keep their cameras lighting up when they are not at home. Until there is evidence to the contrary, I stand to be proven wrong.

As I have said before, Malia should go to her own room and stay for at least a week. If Leora does not visit her, then she will know all that she needs to know. If Leora does visit her, Malia will have more control in her own bed.

Leora needs plenty of sack time now. She still has to recover from getting her back blown out. LOL

I believe that I am correct that Malia and Leora have not been together right after she has come home from her excursion. I hope it is out of respect for Malia. Nobody wants sloppy seconds.

A visual indicator that something significant seems to have changed in the relationship between Leora and Malia is the frequency that Malia is "uninvited" to Leoras room by the closed door. We can recall that I first posted that Leora had never visited Malia's room several months ago. Immediately after, Leora went to Malia's room and stayed about thirty seconds. Since then, Leora has entered Malia's doorway only a couple of times for a brief moment that I have observed. I don't know what it means yet...just making the observation.

Much of the conversation in the previous pages was more about other topics than about Leora and Malia. Why there is so much extraneous conversation is not clear to me unless it is to continue the promotion. I think that the newly observed connection that Malia is making to the outside world via telephone is because she is finally realizing that she is just as clueless as we are about Leora and her movement. BFF? I seriously doubt it as I see little evidence of it except when its time for Leora to do her show.

It seems clear to me that Leora has moved on. I have repeated this statement now for a couple months. I believe that Leora is trying to maintain her RLC security by using Malia as cover for her time away as she pursues her private life. It's as though her time before with Paul was not considered her "private life" although we saw her on camera for years. Now her private life seems so mean something else? Does "Private life" now mean "secret life". RLC subscribers were promise access to her "private life" in the corporate mission statement "The Private Lives of Other People Live 24/7 since 2011". Still, her devoted fans spend hour after hour looking at her vacated bed (according to the thumbnails) and awaiting her return. The apartment now is nothing more than a place to recover and to change clothes, and to implicate Malia in the cover. RLC is surely pleased that they can satisfy so many subscribers with so little content. Thankfully, I shall not be amongst those who watch and wait.

You misquote me.

I need to correct myself regarding the earliest example of male-male sex play on RLC...Before Yanai had his moment with a guest, During a party some time ago, Sasha let a male guest play with his balls.

It's for the very reasons you cite that I do not "enjoy" this site (as much as I did Carla's first site)... they are unremarkable. Although they "don't go lesbian shows" , they are the first on RLC that I have seen to display male-male eroticism between Yanai and a guest. They are so unremarkable that they were not even the first on RLC to display male anal penetration. (Kylie and Rus were the first when Kylie penetrated Rus' ass with a big dildo a few weeks ago. But..to each his own.

In all the civilized societies that I am aware of, guests are not given the privilege to violate rules. If I loan someone my car, I am responsible. If I loan someone my computer, I am responsible, If I invite someone into my home, I am responsible (as was deemed the case with Vanessa by the old RLC).

So to those who are with cameras being covered by guest, please give me your thoughts about this scenario: What if guests decide to cover the cameras and to commit a sexual assault in the apartment? (This is not hypothetical...it is the actual allegation that led to the closing of Vanessa's apartment).

I can recall that Venessa lost her second apartment because of the conduct of her guests. If Carla's apartment continues to violate the camera rules without any repercussion, it will confirm my suspicion that Carla has some kind special RLC connections. She is already amongst the few who have been given two different apartments with two different partners. That is rare. I can only imagine how may couples are lined up waiting for an RLC apartment who are willing to enforce the rules with their guests.

As I said, I don't know what standards the current RLC owners are operating by. My observations was about how camera covering in the past used to be a serious infraction. As has been stated, many apartments in the past were sanctioned for this violation. I disagree that guest should have a different standard. All guests used to be vetted by RLC and that included a review of the rules...especially about covering cameras. I also understand that guests used to have to sign an agreement giving consent to be on camera. (This came about as a result of a legal challenge to RLC following a three way sex romp with Nina and Kia and a girl they brought home). I thought that problem had been solved but it seems to be reoccurring under the current RLC owners. I have to say I am surprised, however, to see some who rationalize that it should be ok for guests to violate rules.

I know that for some, covering the cameras may seem insignificant. From the position of corporate policy, however, breaking the rules intentionally, and doing it more than once without any consequences, is a sign of poor institutional health. It is suggestive of a decline in the standards of the organizations. If I intentionally and repeatedly violated rules in my industry, I would be in serious trouble. But then, not all organizations care much about their own rules when it comes to an infraction by a friend or relative or a star employee.

I don't know if the rules current RLC owner are the same as they used to be but apartments that blocked cameras used to be in big trouble. A little after 6:00am, the female guest completely blocked both camera #11 and #12 with what looked like t shirts. That used to be a big deal. I don't think I have seen anyone do that in many years. Another reason to be disappointed.

So does that mean that Nicholas was bullshitting us?