eagleb1

I saw her change her top and pants exposing her bra and panties to him.  He didn't look up from his phone.

What are their sleeping arrangements?  I can't tell from the free camera.

1 hour ago, jabbath1987 said:

Yes that's Sugar

Lots of alcohol and one bed.  I doubt anything will happen, but that's the kind of situation a voyeur enjoys. 

4 hours ago, Unsichtbarer said:

We Germans have no blood in our veins, we have beer instead!

 

 

4 hours ago, Unsichtbarer said:

We Germans have no blood in our veins, we have beer instead!

 

 

We arrived in Dusseldorf during Fasching. We were surprised at how raunchy things were.  An American friend who had spent a lot of time in Germany, later told me that marital fidelity rules were suspended during Fasching.  Was he kidding me?

On 6/30/2017 at 4:55 PM, Amy3 said:

10,000 posts! Much love to all my CC friends!

Amy, thank you for your posts.  I enjoy reading the female perspective here.

11 hours ago, Amy3 said:

.... Most of the chains that I saw in Europe did have their own specialty items and condiments. KFC is too greasy for me. I very rarely eat it.  ...

We arrived in Dusseldorf late at night.  We left the women in the room and my son and I went out to see what food we could bring back.  There was a McDonald's and, being Germany, we shouldn't have been surprised that they sold beer.

@Amy3I used to maintain my pool myself.  It was very satisfying knowing that I was creating a safe place for my family.  And, it was so different from what I did for a living.

I hope someone can fill me in on what's happening here.  It looks like Sugar(?) and her guy are permanent guests,  They seem to have an arrangement where each couple gives the other couple alone time.

At some point today at what was early evening for them, I saw James dry-humping Chloe from behind on their balcony.  I checked back a little later and he had dropped his pants and her panties and was going at it full speed.  They then came inside and finished missionary style.  One annoyance to us free viewers is when they leave their laptops open on the table further obstructing our limited view.  As I said in a thread I started, beggars can't be choosers;  Soon after they finished, the other couple appeared.

.

On 6/20/2017 at 10:52 PM, Amy3 said:

Thx Nack! You definitely need to visit NYC. If you love seeing gorgeous women in nice clothes every 2 seconds, then this is the place to be.

Something I noticed. The new trend in women's clothing style is going to be going braless. Gentlemen, get ready to start enjoying seeing lots of giggling boobs and pointy nipples more frequently. I know that I did.

I must have missed that you were visiting NYC.

I live in a suburb, but have owned a NYC high-rise apartment since 1990.  Our apartment has a view of another high-rise across the street.  Since I worked in the city, I would spend a few nights in the apartment each week to cut down on commuting.

The mid to late 90s was the golden age of voyeuring there.  I counted nine apartments where I saw couples having sex.  Seldom did a night go by when I didn't see female nudity.  You got to know a lot about some of them and created imagined stories about their lives.

Once I retired, my wife and I just use it for weekends.  The occupants across the way have also changed dramatically, While those in the golden years were younger and probably renters, most of those units are now occupied by older, more careful occupants who, like us, mostly spend weekends there.

And, yes, Amy, it's a delight watching the passing scenery in summer.

21 hours ago, Foamy T. Squirrel said:

I had a cute co-worker who bought a Yugo. She was thrilled when she got it. The thrill lasted at least two hours.

 

Back in 1961, there was a Billy Wilder comedic movie called One, Two, Three.  It was set in Berlin and there was a funny sequence about an unreliable East German car.

In 1965, my wife and I were in West Berlin  and had to get to the East Berlin airport to fly to Prague.  Taxi drivers from the West couldn't cross into the East so they dropped us at the nearest check point to the airport.  The East Germans were kind enough to send a car to pick us up.  My wife and I had to suppress laughing when what came sputtering up was on of those cars made fun of in the movie.

For the record, we flew an Interflug Airline Ilyushin 18.  Can anyone here top that?

8 hours ago, CowArt said:

2007 Citroën C6 (2.7 V6 HDiF).

Don't think you get a lot of those on your side of the big pond. This obviously is a studio-pic, but mine is identical, beside the fact that it hasn't been washed in almost a year.

I love those big weird Citroën's with the hydropneumatic suspension, I had two XM's before this.

 

Back in the late 1950s, a business associate (in the US) had whatever the latest model was then. The joke was that you had better be friendly with a good plumber.

I'm intrigued by the drama in this apartment.  I went to sleep at 06:00 their time and the party was still going on.  When I checked them at a little before 13:00 I saw a couple in the bed. When they woke, they didn't show any affection, but then from my very limited free view he seems to be trying to cuddle.

Who was the female having sex in the bathroom?

Oddly enough, this apartment comes closest to a real voyeur experience.

First of all, the situation looks promising, but unpredictable. A voyeur expects a very low success rate and has infinite patience.

Like in real life, as a free lurker, i have a very limited view that I can't change.  By the way, did other views show what was happening between Sugar and the blond guy?

I understand why paying "voyeurs" are disappointed.  And, yes, there is at least an implied contract for VH to let you know when the expected things are not happening.

24 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

Nope it was not

He was clearly trying (and sometimes succeeding) in  touching her genital area despite clear resistance on her part.  You might say that she wasn't being physically restrained from leaving, but it was the middle of the night and I doubt that she would have had a safe place to go at that hour.

I don't know where you're from, but in the U.S. far less than that without clear (non-drunk) consent is definitely a crime.

Even as a horny teenager I would have taken NO, NO, NO, NO, NO  as more than a hint.  

Seriously, some of that action by the blonde guy against Sugar(?) last night was a sexual assault.

My main drive is a 2012 Subaru Outback.  A  good practical wagon for living in the northeast U.S.

I have a 2003 Mini Cooper which we mainly use to drive to our apartment in the city.  Easier to park and I can just ignore the new dings from careless city parkers.

My toy is an original 1990 red Miata with 21,000 miles on it.  Sadly, as a care-giver to my wife, it's one of many pleasures I have to mostly forgo. 

As you can see, I'm not much into prestige cars.  I must say that before I retired I enjoyed the luxury cars the company provided me with.

18 hours ago, Amy3 said:

Try my method. I quit a million times too. Good luck. Ok, now I'm banned.

Continuing off topic, but this is more interesting right now than what's happening in the apartment.

First, you will gain weight unless you have superior self control.  The reason is simple --- food now tastes delicious.

Second, you will be disgusted at how your clothes smell in your closet. Remember, you've always smelled that way to your non-smoking friends.

Done. You can put the cuffs on me.

11 hours ago, Amy3 said:

Well, that is least promising. Smoking is really bad for the development of babies. I would hate to think that I somehow hindered the best possible development of my child because of smoking. It's not worth the chance.

I'm old so this was a long time ago.  My wife and I were both smokers (ugh).  While we didn't know then about smoking and fetal development, nature sort of provided.  My wife would get nauseous at any smell of cigarette smoke.  She quit completely and i had to do it away from her.  As a long-time former smoker, i don't know how she put up with what my breath must have smelled like.  

3 hours ago, Amy3 said:

I think all of the voyeur sites have cams in kitchens and dining rooms. The idea is cover the whole apt so thst the viewer can see all sorts of behavior, not just sex. Plus, it eliminates hiding.

That's fine for subscribers.  To attract new business, you should tease them with a limited view of areas more likely to have some nudity and displays of affection.  The Chloe and James apartment is a good example of that. 

Not to beat this to death, but VH is continuing to make changes that make it less likely that I will check out their free cameras.  I'm a lost cause but I question whether that's a good strategy for attracting new customers.

Most of the new realms have cameras in places where romantic things are less likely to occur  --- like kitchens and hallways.  In Penthouse Forum fantasies I guess you can imagine that will lead to multiple couplings.  Not too likely in the real voyeur world. 

23 hours ago, ww_watcher said:

These are very weak arguments.

Obviously we have different ideas about how to deal with unexpected dire events.

Yes, there is a difference in intent between a terrorist and a drunk driver.  But the people who care about you will miss you as much whoever caused it.  Of course we should do all we can to prevent terrorism.  But, we will save a lot more lives if we take impaired driving more seriously.  Do you know that there are countries that have ZERO as the permitted blood alcohol level.

Much of life is about weighing risks versus rewards.  My grandson is a Yankee fan and his father and I are Met fans.  Do you think that I would consider the extremely remote chance of a terrorist attack keep me from the lovely shared experience?  There about 60,000,000 people attending major league baseball games in the U.S. every year and there have been no terrorist deaths.  I like the odds.

And, yes, I know the difference between an automatic and semi-automatic weapon.  As a practical matter it's a distinction without a difference.  In reality, semi-automatic is deadly enough.

Yes we should be vigilant, but to rephrase a corny slogan, if we panic, then the terrorists have won.

I'M OUTTA HERE.

As a long time actual voyeur I am pretty aware of how "careless" people behave in real life.  I realize that casually viewing a voyeur site where the participants are compensated requires a suspension of disbelief, but that requires that the viewees do things that are consistent with what most people really do.

At first, VH had a few locations that had realistic voyeur possibilities.  Over time, however, they are moving towards group nudity and group sex situations.  Members complain if the participants miss one day of lengthy sex sessions.  I get it.  VH is a business and, as such, gives their buyers what they want.

But, in my opinion, you can't consider that a plausible depiction of voyeurism.  If you want to  watch posed sex acts, a simple Google search can keep you busy for the rest of your life.

15 minutes ago, Howard said:

You can turn any sour event into a 'blessing'. That "only" knives and a car were used and not firearms.  I suppose there should now be a ban on cars and cutlery.  You have to go deeper than that and find out why firearms were not used.  My guess is this wasn't a well planned attack (probably done in haste). Possibly a message to those who will soon attend the Ariana Grande concert.  But its early conjecture on anyone's part.

 

We each set what level of risk we are willing to take.  In February 1992 we had planned on going to Israel but, because of the Gulf War, we went to Hawaii instead.  I didn't regret it, but statistically, Israel was safer.

As to the weapons they used, you are ignoring the reality that in most western counties, it is nearly impossible for a private citizen to buy an assault weapon or even a side arm.  I'm in favor of making it much more difficult to get firearms but I'm comfortable with the restrictions on getting cars and cutlery.

7 hours ago, Howard said:

Personally, I am very selective when and to where I go out. Will not go to a baseball or basketball game. Definitely will not go to a concert unless its in a small venue. I will avoid at all costs an area near a tourist attraction (which are many as I'm in SoCal). And as I have family who depend on me, I vowed to do everything possible NOT to become a victim (which is why, although illegal, I carry a concealed firearm with me most of the time).

 

You do realize that this means that the terrorists have won in your world.  Of course their actions cannot be tolerated but do you recognize how tiny the probability is that you will be affected by terrorism.  You are vastly more likely to be killed by a drunk driver crossing your own street, but what are you doing about that?

And, your comment about illegally carrying a gun should remind U.S. people how grateful U.K. people are that the only weapons they had were a car and a knife. In the U.S., they could have had legal automatic guns.  Imagine how much more damage they could have done.

1 hour ago, StnCld316 said:

He said on the Campaign Trail he was going to get out of the Paris Climate Agreement and he did just that.   I like a guy who lives up to his word.

He Promised and He Delivered. 

I'd rather see him live up to his promise to provide more health care at lower cost.

1 hour ago, ww_watcher said:

I guess I should have been less cryptic. I meant, I wonder if it really happened at all.

As to the hacking but non reporting of the RNC emails, I've seen no articles or [stupid] memes about that, which if so, would have been a rampage-worthy event and all over the news. You may be the only one who's heard that, which makes me question it too.

I guess Fox news didn't cover it, so it didn't happen.  A simple Google search should solve this.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/investigation/rnc-e-mail-was-hacked-901763