Nicholas

I'm just gonna start reporting other's comments that are noticed to continue posting unrelated comments in topic listings for spam comments. I don't believe I'll be the only one doing so. I've mentioned before that ever so often should be perhaps considered understandable or overlooked with anyone, but consistently or constantly should not be.

You certainly have been disregarding thread topic listings in regards to a good bit of the commentary you've been posting as well. It's no wonder someone who does so, would post commentary of encouraging others to follow suit and do so as well. You were just recently within the last day or so called out for some of the commentary you've been posting in various threads of the different rlc sections of the forum. So it's been being noticed by others as well. Spamming a forum's threads is not only related to posting constant gifs unrelated to a topic listing, but also constantly posting commentary not related to a topic listing as well. If there happen to be others posting commentary in some topic listing that's not related to the topic listing, and anyone posts comments responding to those that are not related, those comments are therefore usually not related as well.

That's complete b.s. The only actual and real reason this thread has been having any tension for awhile now is because of those who choose to completely disregard this thread's topic listing as well as other thread's topic listings and post whatever the hell they want regardless of it not being anything actually related to the topic listing. Then there are those such as yourself that posts commentary encouraging such nonsense just like your latest post of commentary in this thread, and are therefore doing the same when doing so. There was a time when mod's. removed or hid commentary that was not related to a topic listing, and I believe it occurred especially when it had been being noticed to have been being done constantly or consistently by anybody.

Regarding what those who participate in the various forum threads related to rlc probably like or don't like, or whatever ways they may would rather have or do things as far as any allowable thread listings, it has been the same at any section of CC's. various threads related to rlc. since the last time this sites mods or admin. decided to change things to the ways they are now. There was a decision made not to allow any topic listing that was titled as a general topic at the L&M threads section. So those who participate there, have become accustomed to using a thread that is titled specifically, more as a generalized topic thread. I realize why the decision was made to do it there and not all others, but that was not my decision to make because I am not a mod. of this site nor part of it's admin.

This topic listing does not list anything of more specific subject matter related to the project participants that it was created for. All it lists is their names and that should be considered to be that of more of a generalized topic that can be caracterized as being quite broad. It is not the same as any topic listing that is more specific by it's listing title or description. My comments were related to the participants which should be considered as being on topic in this thread.

I was fairly certain of that, but I didn't want to insinuate or make any false claims like others seem to enjoy doing on this site from time to time.

I don't smoke weed and I don't make shit up, other than in some joking manner for humor ever now and then, and those times are clearly understandable as so, but certainly not the way it was insinuated. I've noticed that you have done that on a number of occasions on this site, just like you just did about insinuating that someone was trying to instigate some conspiracies or some shit. It probably would be better if you refrained from your claims of falsehood whenever you have chosen to do so.

Perhaps that may have been an underlying point. The last line of comment should have given it away.

There was no insinuation whatsover of any conspiracies. Perhaps someone may need to be careful of how much weed is smoked before reading things

Does anyone else happen to consider it to be unusual that the project's admin. decided to list 'Gina and Bruno rejoined the project' in the info. box at the top of the sites main page, rather then that of 'Gina rejoined the project and Bruno joined the project'. Perhaps I could be wrong because I've never payed as much attention to either of those two participants, but I don't recall Bruno ever having been listed as a project participant previously. If not, then perhaps it is just some more of the project admin's. less than straight forward ways with customers.

That may be so, but I think you may have forgotten to mention a couple of things filipe. Allow me to restate the matters to include what may have been forgotten. Leora love Malia and Paul and Yvonne and Nick Malia and Paul and Yvonne and Nick love Leora Leora likes to give affection and love to Malia and Nick Malia and Nick likes to give affection and love to Leora Leora likes that alot. 😉

Awww, there's a croc needs tending to there mate. 🐊 Have another mug 🍺 of Carlton draught and tend to that croc and you'll be alright mate. 😏

Since it is the weekend, it was somewhat surprising that Leora returned as soon as she did.

I've never insinuated nor claimed that I, myself have always been 100% completely satisfied of everything that I was able to observe anywhere on the project. Although admittedly there have been times here and there where I have occasionally expressed some levels of disappointment or discontent related to the project, those times have been few compared to the overall amount of time I chose to subscibe to the project, which happens to include the time since I chose to join CC's and to occasionally participate as a member of the site's various threads. I have certainly never visited any of the threads of this site to continuously express thoughts of negativity even during some times of experiencing some levels of disappointment or discontent. The way I see it, if someone is not satisfied with anything that includes a cost, that someone will likely sooner than later not continue to be associated with whatever the cost may be for. When that occurs with anyone, imo they should simply find something else that interests them rather than carrying on or continuing expressions of disappointment or discontent related to the other. Of course it is common sense that those that may be satisfied enough for something that has a cost, yet they usually enjoy more times than not, will continue with whatever it is for as long as they want or can afford to.

If you are insinuating that they spend 70 to 75% of their time away from the apartment, that insinuation is most certainly very much exagerated to a point of being completely wrong. To the contrary, they spend at least that much of their time at that apartment. Just because they evidently have reasons of why there have been only a few visitors or guests, actually means little regardless of anyone elses's perceptions, views, or opinions on such matters. As it has already been mentioned, no one really knows but them as to why that may be, and it may very well be because others that they associate with there elsewhere, would rather not be subjected to the extra exposure. If that does happen to be so, and it certainly should be considered, that is not and should not be considered that they are choosing to conceal that part of their lives. Besides, anyone who has been observing often enough, knows how much time they actually do spend at the apartment and therefore how much of their private lives are actually shown.

Of course it's true that they spend times away from the apartment. But a majority of people in life spend times away from their residences for one reason or another. Those two women are residing at that apartment a majority of the time each week. Residing as you well know is related to residency. Residency as you know is more or less defined as a condition of someone in relation to where someone resides. Both of which are related to a residence. You as well as anyone else knows what a residence is. Regardless of whatever they may or may not choose to do whenever they may be at the residence, is certainly their prerogatives to do so regardless of any cams or anyone elses opinions or anything similar. Because there have been very few visitors or guests should be actually considered irrelevant since no one other than themselves knows any reasons why. For all anyone else may know, it may be nothing more than those whom they have met and become friends with there would rather not be somewhere where they, themselves are exposed to lenses that may be noticed around the world. Everyone is not of the same mindset regarding such matters. Whatever there may be for any of their reasoning, they are only away from the apartment a part of their time and are at the apartment a majority of their time. That should be considered as residing at, and therefore living at the apartment.

Regardless of whatever may be believed by anyone, they do reside at the apartment most of the time, and therefore most of their private lives occur there. What they do when away from the apartment, is only a part of their lives. Regardless of whether or not they have had few visitors or guests there or not, does not mean that perhaps they should or not. Especially if it means just to satisfy anyone else's concerns or speculations or suspicions of whatever it may be that they may or may not be doing while away from the apartment. When anyone subscribes to rlc, they subscribe to have access to various residence's cams, but not to every facet or detail of any particular participants life.

That is only part of their lives. The majority of their private lives are spent at an apartment. As with any of the other partcipants, some chose to want their significant other to visit and spend time with them at their respective residences, and some chose not to, and some did not or do not have significant others to do so. Regardless, because someone subscribes to something, doesn't mean the participants of whatever it may be should have to change the ways they choose to live their lives.

As mentioned in the previous response to another post, all anyone can do is simply accept that it is after all their prerogatives to live their lives as they so choose. The same should be considered for any of the participants of the project. The matter of others subscribing to something any of them are participants of, does not mean that any of them should have to change the ways they so choose merely because they chose to be participants of something that others subscribe to. The fact that any of them chose to do so, is likely more than many others would have done.

That may very well be so, but it is after all their prerogatives to live their lives as they so choose. Just because there are others that subscribe to something they are participants of, doesn't mean they should have to modify or change the way they choose to live their lives. If the matter is really given enough consideration from various perspectives, they have already done so merely by choosing to be participants in something that many others would not.

I believe that most who have visited this particular thread from time to time believe that although much of what filipe may post may be considered to be repititious, but most all of what he has posted and posts is considered to be commentary that is positive. Some people have tendencies to overlook repitition if it is related to that of being considered to that of positivity rather than that of being considered to be that of negativity. Of course there will never be only one or the other because evidently, one cannot exist without the other. Whether anyone consistently posting immature ridiculous gifs in response to others posts while not commenting on or mentioning anything that is related to a particular topic, or consistently posting commentary that is blatantly subject matter just the opposite of any particular topic listing description, reveals nothing more than someone being disgruntled and feeling compelled to express or spread their feelings of negativity. Regardless of the reason, both types of postings may be considered as spamming. I noticed that some of the gifs have already been hidden or removed. Don't be surprised if some of the other posts that are just the opposite of a topic listing gets reported as spam as well.

Yes, do be honest, you did create such threads in the past, and what happened to them ? They had some participation from time to time, more at the beginning then afterwards, and eventually fizzled out. Why ? Because others do not care to continuously notice someone who is known to have been almost always negative and complaining in some way. So now after somewhat of a hiatus, you choose to return to your original methods of posting in whatever thread you think may get the most attention to your comments and blatantly disregard the topic listings for which you post in.

It's been mentioned previously, and I'll mentiion it again. Although there may be none of CC's various thread topic listings that whoever may participate in, may do so by always commenting on some subject matter related to any particular topic listing. It has seemed that a majority of those that have participated in various topic listing threads, have done so by usually mentioning something related to whatever any certain topic listing may be. Although there are, and have been times when those that in most cases usually do, there have also been some times occasionally when some may go off topic and mention something not related to some particular topic listing. Then there have been some who have been known to have blatantly disregard topic listings consistently. What you have been doing in this topic listing thread is a perfect example of doing so. But, of course this all has been mentioned before so it's not like you don't realize or think enough about what you're doing when you post what you post, because you certainly do, and it's only for attention. You are perfectly aware of the 'start new topic' option, but you would rather disregard particular topic listings, just to attempt to garner attention to your negative disposition. It would be better all the way around if you would try to refrain from doing so, or at least not as often so much.

That may be your opinion of such, but of course a definition of spam or spamming suggests otherwise. All that it may take is enough of anyone or others to submit reports on their considerations of believing that any series of consistent off-topic posts may very well be so, and it may be very likely that those reports and related posts will be looked at and reviewed by a mod. or someone in the sites admin., whereas then a decision may be made as to whether or not to do something about it. It is not difficult for anyone to submit such a report on any post they may have any unusual concern regarding and it does not take long at all to do. On the contrary, all it takes is seconds to do when all someone has to do is tap or click on the 3 dots located at the top right of any post, then click or tap on spam, and there is even a comment box option that can be utilized as well. But as stated earlier, you can and should do as you choose or wish to.

Would have been nice to observe them spend some more time together and perhaps share other experiences together that would have been intriguingly interesting more so than what has sermed to have become a norm there.