thedbear
Members-
Posts
9,282 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
1,875 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by thedbear
-
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
me too... relieved to know I wasn't the only one -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
see the whole flow of my ticket. I was specific on the dates and thus asked which realm I wanted to add to shortly afterwards the "excuse" for problems and lost period. In my view, the first service was in general and the second sent to those who in the future (or already current) will deal with it. With that time passes and "sorry for the inconvenience" will become a popular "stamp". Moving this customer away. -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
my turn to say ... I hope too -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
And yes, moments lost in Dec and Jan ... I at least know of some, but they were irrelevant in the collection of the projects themselves. And host problems that already informed resolved or controlled, would not prevent reloading now from the days stopped.π And yes, current criteria, because if operations have already been exempted from their voluntary contributions, all we have seen so far is a stark reduction of files. For the present date.π -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
Sorry and it is not personal to any of the 2 projects mentioned, but where was the "rescue" of realm16 for day 5 more relevant than that of realm57 for the same date? This new scenario and criteria is what makes this very worrying. Note that on my tiket I pointed out the 2 projects and the "official" answer suport is that the period was lost.π -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
The files will now be the ones we have on twitter ... and don't even think about complaining. Seriously now ... I thought it would just be a "support" to better guide operators on what to do. But seeing what this really means, the impending disaster is even more terrifying and worrying.rrying.π₯Ί -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
That's why I say that the boat (the only one that was still moving and stabilized) will sink ... And it will take the site and premiuns together.π -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
The truth is that work and time were lost so much for those who create (participant), those who register (operations) and us, who believe and trust. For example cold and short> realm53 which is my cam to access the site day 2 (1 moment) day 9 (2 moments) day12 (3 moments-4 counting with Alexandra's bath) for 8 CC forum pages?π₯Ί -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
I just checked and fixed it 2 days ago so far this option does not exist for me yet. And I enter the menu at the end of the main page Faq Support next to the vhtv logo -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
until 2 days ago, neither had it. So much so that I used "others" Change what really works ... Effectively this boat tends to sink. And it will pull the site together. -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
Well, this is true. These above It didn't take even 10 minutes to not be resolvedβΉοΈ -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
For this, operations or whoever it is would have to have a storage period of more than 48 hours (4 days for example). The same for these files to be prepared. That way you can work in a better condition. I never saw the need for something that happened yesterday to have to be on the bench today. What is the timeline for then? -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
Do not involve support in this, because then we will have many, many "justifications" like these. Let those who really have experience and proven competence for +3 years to continue dealing with this process. It does involve "support" for "maintenance" of these files that are not working properly regardless of whether they are old or loaded less than 2 weeks ago. I have always had the service moments as plan B for momentary deficiencies of the site and until practically the end of last year it had not yet disappointed me in such intensity. -
Archive Moment Requests Part #3
thedbear replied to K.Lane's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
Hi! Why the days 3-4-5 of this period (Feb) have not yet been covered in momentary files, if those responsible for their captures already informed that they had already been properly generated and thus, ready to be loaded? Good day, tanks for the email. Could you specify please, what realm would you like to add videos from? OK! For guided days still in delay, as requested realms14; 17; 16; 55; 10; 65; 57; 51; 84; 26; 53; 74; 85; 72. I notice that they are in ascending order on the page and that I know that they have adequate material for these days. Hello, Thanks for contacting us. Unfortunately, no more videos of those days will be uploaded up to hoster issue which caused videos to be brokenπ€¨. Sorry for inconveniences! (according to the "πs" service of support the broken days were 3-4-5). So the only regular service since this site was created has hit rock bottom? π33 active projects and a little over 500 files, where there should be at least 1200 (or more) ?! Pay a premium subscription for this? -
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
OK thank you!πππ -
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
Well, not all but a significant amount is on the table in the living room. Curious as to whether all will be usedπ -
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
I did not understand...π Sorry! -
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
Really?!? Will they have their own project? π -
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
Really curious. But early looking at these caps as soon as they were posted I wondered what a project with this couple would be like?π Apparently we will have a small sample ...π -
Beverley & Hugo (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Beverley & Hugo - (09/04/19 - 11/12/20)
is true! Do they look like the same girl?π² -
Hahaha!π If Alan can, why can't she?π
-
Mira & Henry (2020) Part #1
thedbear replied to StnCld316's topic in Henry, Jutta, Sibilla - (10/12/17)
They are coming again one by one, in sequence.π Jumping the blonde in black is an option.π -
Well, if they "sleep" they will "wake up" together and more willingπ
-
although I would prefer it more with Ilka and Sam. They who need this type of "push" downhill the mostπ
-
π