thedbear

No ideas ? Well, I'll give a very warm example to the moment. See now Stella, Estephan and the guest. They are still going and do not indicate signs that they will end And it is already 5:30 am there; join, Edda, Serena and Joe ... how much this will lift. Edda, Alan and Joe or Edda, Nina and Alan. Or Nina, Joe, and Edda? How many times have we had parties for this and in the end resulted in nothing?

The resumption is not difficult or impossible. Just finish what you start with no setbacks or exits. What are "burning" here are expected to be created and not performed in complete Inappropriate deviations "Deviations" created and practiced among themselves. It would not be necessary either Edda or Serena, and now much less Nina, "seek" out there, what they have internally. An effective interaction between these 5 creates a range of diverse possibilities to be explored almost to infinity. Only, NO one there make soft body or be part of resistance to the collective purpose of both projects, An example: let's all for Edda provide meaningful statistics? So let's all promote a meaningful statistic. No change of direction by deliberate "drunkenness" or "tiredness." Notice that none of what was actually performed only among the girls, had deviation or steps back. Everything went forward. Only that involved Alan and / or Joe that resulted in this condition. .

Not that Serena is important and special. Nina, Alan and Serena have equal weights in this set. It is only up to them and especially the bridge between them, Alan, and to be conscientious with responsibility and seriousness in this. Separate project needs from real affective relationships. Both Alan and Nina have low personal reserves and lose the line with a certain ease and without reason (between both). Serena is more centralized in herself and can overcome this. Even being the intermediary of conciliation to the conflicts there. She cries, looks in the mirror, breathes and surpasses. That is why she is special. She does not have at any moment in any other Vh project a "force" equal to her or near.

Put this as I said above; The two active projects have to paddle in the same direction and with all the members doing their part in the momentum. It is not possible for some to paddle and to encourage forward and others to make resistance or try to change direction If everything that was already planned there before (with evidence) had gone to effective execution, this management would be light years ahead of the others ... The other VH projects are giving the rhythm of the current there.

Well this, I followed the little online and by the reactions, together it is more than evident that there were some observations of effect. I will still check the timeline if the same happened in Edda. My guess, though, is yes.

I thought exactly like that. And I will hate myself in this remark. But I think that the physical presence of George, (even if short again), to organize the scenarios personally is made on time.

Ok, here's my speculation. No basis in any translation I do not have. I watched Nina's departure on Saturday online and the way she did it, even in relation to Alan (who was still sleeping there) did not indicate in any way a break or something along the way. Quite the opposite. The luggage she packed was very simpes. For a few days. Your main things are still there. Something, however, evidently went beyond what was intended. You may have become ill on this trip and / or prevented from a planned return. Their behavior over the last few days indicates this with relevance. . However, I've been observing that even without her presence she keeps in touch (not diary, which is strange) and at times her line of conversation with Alan in particular goes into political debates. That Nina absence left Alan without ground is more than evident. See how much he there, seems to be bewildered. Looks, no ... he's bewildered .. Even Serena, tries to keep the base of the set, but alone, is literally almost impossible.They have to row in the same direction. There is no room to be different. And when Nina finally returns, she will have to bring with her in the baggage, a rabbit capable of taking a magician out of the hat. ī

That's what I mean,

Yes, I understood you now. Really the special features that I wanted to refer to is what we have in Edda or Clara for example. Tim no disposes of this but we see the bathroom door by the corridor cam and in some "distracted" moments to its interior. Here what I say is that they take a direction that by the plant indicates this, but we are not sure effective.

Do the homework and check how many projects, we have effectively made sure that its members took up time in using bathrooms without leaving us any questions. . . Here we are still speculating as being, this is the possibility.

But the second project really was too big. The Vh himself admitted the existence of other dependencies conjugated there and of use of neighbors. We saw this in practice. Here however is different. We have a balcony which should be covered with cam and a bathroom (which in other projects here are already covered with special features). Reinforcement. The project history should be a reference not to tolerate this. New people and therefore, easy to extract this "cancer" before it takes tale of the rest

The solution here passively and palliatively is very simple. A cam compulsorily in the entrance of the apartment. As we have in practically 80% here in the other projects. This way we will know effectively when they leave the place or when they "hide" in other dependencies. At least in the first project (Alina & Eugene) we knew when they had left the apartment. even in RLC, this doubt does not apply. All apartments have cam covering their entrances.

Well! This finally explains or creates more doubts here. mari for this moment is straight (at least we have not seen anything that counters this condition) and has a "boyfriend" or "friend with benefits". Then she, by the definition of the composition "&", makes pair with Maria (that we know BI, effectively). Once Maria "disappears" for hours with the "guest" talking or smoking, can we interpret that there is a sharing of "properties"? Of the type, what's mine, is yours too?

Wow! Ooopel! If even you're being sarcastic with this situation then it really was a tremendous "tread on tomato" of them there.

Particularly, I'm now a bit reticent to find that all tickets here get by default an automatic response. In my view, it is clear that the cases and "cases" that this occurs. The answer may be automatic, but the analysis of choice of what kind of answer, no.

So just watch the time they were off the cams and the way they were dressed at this time. It reinforces even more similar to what we have in Ana's apartment, a room designed for this. No one is left standing all this time "talking". Mari gets up and leaves at 08:27 and only returns with the others at 08:36. The entrance movement of all and perceptivel by the cam 2 in break of light in the hall. By the angle of cam 1 and 2, they were not out of the apartment.

It really was going too well , to last and be true. We have resumed serious failures from the previous project. Cams freezing, blind spots and unfortunately the worst of all and that we saw practiced without any scruple to previous projects. Disguised and hidden behavior of cams. Lamentable that this still lasts. Same for VH It's only what I have to say to anyone reading this post. Disappointed and very (once again).

Vh, really can not care. But Anna and Alex, who follow our forum here, yes. They do not need people in this example: That they come here, not to add anything and "toast" still attack us "intensionally".

Yes, obvious! Timeline, from now on and timestamp captured and passed on to the support with the abusive gesture our person here.

That's what I'm saying. He's who I DO NOT want to see here anymore.

Look, it was the same in the previous one and now in this one. Ana has no intention of getting rid of the covers. That's why I call it pathetic By their own collaboration to this....

I do not know about the others but I have no interest in seeing this guy here anymore. Or this absurd situation with any other that still comes. Effect "Kenny" should have already been exorcised in this management. ī

under cover sex. This can only be a very bad joke for this project. Ridiculous and pathetic.

Just something to note and detail here. In the first visit of this couple I did not have the exchange between pairs. Will this be done now?