itsme

You can post the link without it auto-embedding by using the brackets: Here is the same video link: https://cdn.reallifecamhd.org/1211.mp4 The "code" brackets tell the editor to interpret the link as plain text rather than html to prevent it from "executing".

Looks like it's up to 1211 videos. Here is the latest one: https://cdn.reallifecamhd.org/1211.mp4

No, you don't need to know html. All you do is paste the link. It will auto-embed if it is a .mp4 file which all the videos that I've liked to are.

I think so, she gave him a napkin as if he needed to clean up.

I don't disagree with you there. I think that when Mueller finally drops the hammer and Trump's shady business dealings and foreign connections come to light that it will eventually end up in the Supreme Court, and I'd rather have a neutral court that way conservatives won't have a leg to stand on when they spend the next decade going on about how unfair it is that Trump got impeached for tax fraud and a litany of white collar crimes.

It's literally the Supreme Court's job to interpret the law and set precedent. Justices will tend to rule in a way that is most consistent with their personal frame of reference and moral beliefs. To say that you don't like activist judges is to say that you don't like the judiciary, as every judge has some form of bias. To many on the left Scalia was a right wing activist judge. One man's activist is another man's principled savant. I generally agree that elected officials should be the one making laws, but it sounds to me like what you're saying is that you don't like the way that "liberal" judges rule. Which was kind of the point of my question. What about having a more liberal interpretation of the law is so terrible to you? Why does having a justice that is going to generally favor the average citizen over big corporations or special interests so threatening to you? What I personally find so alarming about conservative judges is that they so consistently rule in favor of the powerful and almost alway side with big business over consumers. Secondly, a contradiction that I find interesting is that conservatives claim to be the party of law and order, while also claiming to be staunch defenders of "freedom". How can you support freedom while also supporting overly broad and unnecessarily restrictive laws that limit personal freedom and personal choice? Marijuana being an example. Many on the right seem to have an attitude of "laws for thee, not for me". Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort for example who gleefully chanted "lock her up" when talking about Hillary Clinton all while breaking a long list of laws themselves. Fyi, I consider myself a libertarian.

It's the Supreme Court's job to interpret the law and I think any person will naturally do so from whichever prospective they know best, meaning left leaning judges will interpret from a more liberal perspective and conservative judges will rule from a more conservative perspective. I think there is judicial activism on both sides. Even if liberal judges tend to be more "activist", wouldn't you rather have a judge that interprets the law in a more humanist way that generally grants greater freedom to more people? The way I see it conservative judges are more authoritarian, more punitive, and vote in way that is generally more restrictive to the average citizen, and less restrictive to big business. Where as I think liberal justices will generally vote in a way that either favors the individual over big business or that provides the most utilitarian benefit.

There may be several factors, there have been a total of two black people that I recall on the "real life cam" style sites, both of which were from VH-TV and they didn't last long. Perhaps black people would rather watch other black people so they stay on "black" sites. It could also be that culturally CC is predominantly white in that there aren't many "urban" style writers so they feel out of place. It could also be cultural, perhaps they prefer more personal interactions and don't see the appeal of watching others from a distance and never communicating with them. It may also be that their personal lives are more fulfilling to them than spending time on the internet, or that watching porn of any kind is considered a weakness. It's not just camcaps, I would say 95% of mainstream porn is white oriented, rarely do I see black women featured on mainstream porn sites. It could also be that the typical ways that people find sites like RLC and CC are via larger "white" oriented sites that black people typically don't frequent. That's not to say that I don't think there are some black people who frequent CC, but I would guess they make up a small percentage.

I've been hearing a lot of conservatives talk about Ruth Bader Ginsburg dying and their hopes for a new conservative supreme court justice. For the life of me I can't think of any benefit to having a conservative supreme court. The conservative justices seem to favor corporations over the individual, favor restrictive laws that limit personal choice and freedoms, and support social policies that make it harder for those who are disadvantaged. Put another way, conservatives appear to favor the powerful over the weak. Conservative politicians all seem to be in the pocket of big corporations, and the only amendment that they seem to actually care about is the 2nd. Now, I can appreciate that my upbringing has a lot to do with my political beliefs, but as an intellectual and as a practical matter I don't see how conservatism provides any benefit to me personally. I'd like to learn more about the conservative position in a polite and constructive manner. Typically when I broach this topic with conservatives I am met with ad hominem attacks, blatantly and verifiably false "facts", and a general sense that they oppose anything that might be construed as "liberal" simply because liberals support it, even if it means voting against their own interests. What does the average person have to gain from voting for the conservative ticket?

Has Mary ever posted on CC?

I don't think I've ever fully appreciated how nice her tits are.