Jump to content

Alladino

Members
  • Posts

    6,404
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1
  • Points

    1,205 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. I guess the reason why this happens so often in RLC (if you include the GOV girls with BF at home) is the money RLC pays for the pseudo lesbian shows. Sure, there are open relationships, but most of the Shows in these Barcelona apartments are probably made possible because there is money. That would be something, but surely it would only happen outside the camera's field of vision.
  2. They once had almost three times as many apartments, with a lot of really good-looking girls who actually gave an insight into their lives. Alone the group that built up around the music students was worth its weight in Gold (e.g. Anabele, Eva, Nelly, etc.). Every now and then a few nice parties and many other interesting guests. Now they almost only have show girls. All of this surely costed a lot of money, but it also gave the viewer a lot of value and made RLC worth it. Now there is almost only a cheap show, which in quantity as well as in quality does not come close to what RLC used to be.
  3. My goodness, I don't expect anything that hasn't happened on RLC before. I know that RLC can't make everything possible, but I think it's an indecency that they continue to use a saying like "the private life of other people" when in nearly all apartments they only perform silly shows.
  4. You know when a company saves money but the customers still come because they think they will get the good old service. It works for some time, depending on the business, but at some point the customers realize that with the loss of quality (or quantity) the value is not there any more. This is then the end, because you have lost your reputation. BTW, I no longer pay for RLC.
  5. Exactly, and that's what I want to see. Not these bullshit shows that RLC claims to be real life. Back to the roots of RLC, and away from those lifeless show girls in the GOV apartments.
  6. This is one of the few things that never bothered me, although many people get upset about it. I always thought that RLC should have the very few girls who actually lived in the GOV apartments, like Nicole, in the project for much longer. This is also one of the reasons why I think the GOV apartments should be converted into roommate apartments.
  7. Open your eyes. RLC is making easy money from their good reputation. This will go on for a while longer until they finally close down. If they really tried to come back, they would have improved something long ago. What really clarified things is that Piper and Taylor didn't got an apartment. Even if RLC could no longer open apartments in Russia, this would have been possible. But no, not one new apartment. Just increasingly silly shows from month to month. Meanwhile they have sunk so far that VHTV looks more realistic. Sometimes it is important to recognize something for what it is. RLC is as good as finished.
  8. When my membership in RLC expired I took a look at some of my old recordings. If you have some recondings, just give it a try and you will be surprised how big the difference is. Currently, the majority of the content is only a superficial show. We do not look into the lives of the residents but into a façade that they pretend to for the cameras. It is a quite extreme difference. Remember, for example there were once 20 couple apartments. Now there's only 3 couple apartments left. BTW, The most dramatic change is that now, in RLC the world is almost entirely made up of girls. Also everywhere these pseudo-lesbian Shows, now. Even in COV.
  9. Perhaps one of the best examples is Gina. She apparently lives in Barcelona, but we don't see any of her real friends in the GOV apartment. Is she in a relationship? Who are her real friends. With who does she have sex with in real life? We do not have a view into her real life. All we see are silly shows.
  10. I don't know how RLC had paid for the realistic apartments, but the best thing would be to go back to exactly this method. It doesn't matter. Important is that the residents are not paid to give shows. I think the main point is that the residents don't perform for the cameras but instead live as if there were no cameras. Doing things they want to do and not doing what they think the audience would like to see. Before the elimination of all the Russian apartments, this was the majority of the apartments. Now there are maybe two or three that fall into that category. In GOV there is no view into the life of the girls. They give silly shows on the dining table and pretend to be lesbian even if they have a BF at home or in a room nearby. These shows destroy reality.
  11. The question is, do you really think the girls would put dildos in each other on the dining table if there were no cameras???? The difference is whether something belongs to the real life of the residents and we just get a view of it or whether something is being staged for the cameras that would normaly not happen. An example of these events for the cameras is what @Noldus just said about "girls to perform with high heels and dildos and lesbian shows". Another example is probably all those events with pee on camera that took place in GOV lately. The most dramatic influence is probably the separation of girls and boys. All these pseodo lesbian shows surely have little to do with the real life of the girls. They are actually a show for the camera. In the past, RLC was way more realistic. We saw People who really lived in the apartments. There were way more normal visitors and sometimes a real party. Even GOV started much more realistically (e.g. with Nora and her BF).
  12. This is exactly what I mean by unrealistic and performed only for the camera.
  13. The difference is what they get paid for. One way is to pay them for a glimpse into their private lives. Something else happens in GOV where they are obviously paid to do shows.
  14. There are really two elements to distinguish here. One is the question of whether an event takes place on its own or only to increase the number of spectators. The second is whether an event is just an act, e.g. a Girl only pretending to be masturbating. I think in GOV both take place. There are extremely many events that are obviously planned and only performed for the cameras. Somewhat less common seemed to be fake events in Terms of sexual stimulation where it only looks like something is happening. But unfortunately even this is not really rare in GOV, but mostly limited to specific girls. All in all GOV is missing the real life. You don't get a glimpse into the private life but a superficial show that is more and more ridiculous. The decisive element is nevertheless missing. How realistic is something that only happens because the girls get paid for it.
  15. One of the last things I saw in B2 was girls giving a dildo show on the dining table. This is so unrealistic and fake that you're just fooling yourself with your claim. Seriously, what's happening in those apartments is pretty simple to interpret. RLC pays the residents money for sex shows. It is a rejection of the original concept of giving an insight into the private life of the residents. Most likely RLC believes that otherwise not enough would happen. What RLC forgets, however, is that even with much more action now, it's not worth it, because pseudo lesbian porn is available for free all over the Internet in better Quality with better looking girls. In order to have more action, they have undermined their own Concept and lost everything valuable.
  16. Meanwhile there are almost only pseudo lesbian shows on RLC. Almost half of the apartments, with about 75% of the female cast, are occupied with these bullshit shows. Do you really think the girls would do all this if there were no cameras (or they would get money for it)? Sorry, especially Barcelona is nothing more than a nonsensical porn production. Realism has not been present there for a long time.
  17. The pseudo lesbian events of GOV are fundamental different from the genuine swinger events that could have been seen in some of the russian apartments before these were closed. All this porn show events in barcelona are certainly not self-initiated and only serve to give a show for the camera. Meanwhile, RLC is so fake and lifeless that even you should recognize this. RLC create a cheap show spectacles and has forgotten its roots. The excitement that comes from watching something real that you normally wouldn't see. The actual look into the residents' private lives. All that is missing. Why there are still people who pay money for such a stupid thing is a mystery to me. Lesbian porn is available in much better quality everywhere on the Internet for free. Often even with girls who look much better than those in GOV. RLC true added value was the reality. They have now almost completely lost that.
  18. I don't know where this bullshit comes from, but I don't think RLC is on the winning side right now. Everything that happens there is monotonous. There is no real excitement in any apartment. It may seem that these pseudo lesbian shows are very popular. But you shouldn't forget that many of the customers who are actually interested in more reality are gone by now. That RLC is getting more and more desperate can be seen in the fact that the shows are getting more and more silly. The girls start pissing in the corridor or doing dildo shows on the dining room table. 🤮 All the really exciting moments at RLC happend when the residents acrually had fun and not just performed shows for the camera as work. Most of these events took place in Russia and this is what RLC is missing most now.
  19. It's kind of sad, just shows everywhere. It completely lacks the excitement RLC could generate before there lost all the russian apartments. Now, everything is cheap and lifeless. 😣 The Girls do there job according to schedule. 😞
  20. So much wasted potential. So little real life. 😞 RLC is falling apart.
  21. You really believe that? You think of yourself as a kind of free-thinker who saw the truth, while the masses (including science) have no idea? Where have I heard that before? Let me tell you something, you are not smart, you have no special insight, you are just trapped in a thought bubble that you do not want to leave, because your bias gives you comfort. I have shown you the facts and explained them several times to you. My patience with you is at an end. Normaly, I like discussions, but with you it doesn't make sense, because you are not looking for truth or knowledge. End of discussion.
  22. It was the press conference in which the experts explained (in the presence of your beloved Trump) how they interpret the models and that they want to undercut the projected values. An explanation that if you could just get over your bias for a moment, would make all the bullshit about the quality of models you've written here obsolete. But I know by now that you will continue to ignore the facts, because you are not interested in gaining knowledge or the truth. You just want to keep your bias. BTW, The experts have explained all this in response to questions from reporters. Which you obviously reject for the same reason that you reject the facts. You don't think for yourself, you think what is mainstrem in the Trump media bubble.
×
×
  • Create New...