Jump to content

Amy3

Members
  • Posts

    44,423
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    30
  • Points

    -61,425 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Amy3

  1. Well, they might, even that is not gauranteed. Many people are duped all of the time, but that's not my point at all. Karl and Nicole made their choice, my point is that the existence of the archive does in fact hinder the quality and quantity of talent on VHTV. The extent to which I do not know and neither does VHTV.
  2. You can find VHTV videos the same way. The archive doesn't stop it. If anything it makes it easier to get them for nafarious scammers. All it takes is a $40 sub and viola, all of it in one place and "organized".
  3. Almost exclusively in virus ridden scam sites.
  4. Hardly! Why? Caue the quality is worse then most porn. It would spread among users, some would leak (just like it does now), but most of it would be forgotten never to be seen again.
  5. Oh boy! We have a contender. I still think Rockhead was worse though, but damn. 🤣 Thx! 👍
  6. Look at RLC, can you find all of any one tenants content in one place? Nope, you can't and RLC is constantly squashing content all over the internet.
  7. Right, they would, but they would be trapped in a handful of hard drives, not fully available in their entirety in one place accessible to anyone with $40.
  8. Anna's people know how to drag things out better than anyone. 😁
  9. Impossible! Post a gif, I have to see this. Thx!
  10. Don't worry guys, the archives aren't going anywhere and I am not demanding VHTV do anything, I'm just explaining the issue the way I see it. 👍❤️
  11. Of course she pondered it and finally agreed, but, just barely. Like it or not the archive does hinder people from joining, and perhaps some of those would have been great. We won't ever know, but the number is not 0.
  12. I think if VHTV agreed to allow any tenant to have any and all of their content deleted from the archive, this would go a long way to solve this worry. It's not a 100% guarantee, but it's better then having it there forever and having to constantly worry. I've asked James about this before and he told me that tenants can request to have their content deleted, but it solely up to the discretion of VHTV. They can say No!
  13. No, not at all. I know all about Camarads. They did host camstars, but not all of them. They weren't selling the CB camming videos, they were selling their own content.
  14. You guys can say what you want, but I'm telling you it's comes at a price. Having been a sub, I don't think it's worth it. For me being a voyeur is knowing what's going to happen not revisiting what did happen. This is a voyeurn site not a porn site. These are supposed to be "real" people. Real people do worry about this coming back to haunt them and with good reason. I believe that having the archive you end up with more porno type tenants then "real" people. Now you may say that the porno types make better tenants, but I know better. Real people can be very freaky too, but much less when they know it's going to be recorded and stored forever on a site that it totally out of their control. Look what Camarads did. They started selling their archive videos on manyvids.com. What's to stop VHTV from doing that? Nothing, unless the contract prevents it, which I very much doubt that it does.
  15. I know tenants who want their archives removed, but they can't and now they are stuck with a decision made forever. Knowing what they know now, there is a constant fear of it coming back on them. And they don't make anything from anyone watching the vidoes.
  16. Yes, and that's my point. We are missing some great things I think because people aren't willing to forever have their sex life recorded on someone else's website. I think VHTV should compromise and let any past tenant delete their recording if they chose to. This would help ease that concern. If the tenant doesn't care, then it can stay.
  17. Because she crossed a threshold and went for it with a hope and a prayer. From what Karl said, it would have be much easier if the archives were not there. I agree!
  18. I think she a work in progress. She has obviously come around to the idea that it's not the end of the world, but at the same time she thinks about it and deep down it does concern her. I can't blame her, it would me too. I've posted pics of myself here on CC and I do worry that there may be someone who may some day tie all of it back to me and perhaps try to blackmail me. "Amy, pay me $1000, or I'm posting an Amy3 link onto someone in your famiky's facebook". It could happen. I does make me cautious when I post my pics here. Imagine if it was my sex life on a voyeur site that anyone with a sub could see.
  19. If you told me that I had a choice, I could have my sex life forever recorded, owned, and stored by a website or I could not have my sex life recorded in such a manner, I would chose the later and the things I would be willing to do on the non-recorded site would be greater then the recorded one. I gaurantee it! Even if I knew that there was a chance that the subs could record it on their own. Why? Because that would be far less propogated then having permanent access to all of it in an archive.
  20. Not the timeline, the archives.
  21. Yes, true! But not entirely true.
  22. If that's all i can get, I'll take it.
×
×
  • Create New...