JoJoGunne

I don't see how anyone here is harassing Ann by speaking their mind. Heck, if she didn't read this forum she wouldn't even know the good or bad things that people say about her. Do you think people are sending her emails? As far as I know, nobody can talk to her on her cam. She still has her chat turned off, right? I'm thinking you are outraged over something you perceive that is happening to her, but I don't see anything happening to her. Where's the beef?

Yeah...I was thinking that "Hitler" stuff on her page was a bit over-the-top.

btw, for those who care, her website is open again.

[sarcasm] Awwww...now why do you want to say such mean things to me? [/sarcasm] LOL!! (btw, you SHOULD know that when someone says "...everyone knows...", the reality is that what "everyone knows" is really something that nobody...but the person saying it...knows)

shrug... I think I've been very reasonable with everything I've posted about Ann. I'm sorry you are so obsessed that you have a problem with that.

I suggest Ann just do what she wants to do...and to hell with what anyone thinks. Why should she be concerned with whether she "wins" or not?

WTF = What The Fuck

Yes, it is. Try Firefox or IE Or try Opera or Chrome. It's working on those, as well.

As long as Ann continues to put her life on the Internet, you have no serious justification for your outrage.

I don't know if they ever fuck, but they don't fuck on cam. Why? I don't know. Ask Ann.

I wonder...given what I reported that she already said about you (which you have yet to confirm or deny)...why do you bother to post stuff here directed at her? Do you honestly think she will give anything you say or ask of her serious consideration? I'm beginning to think you actually ARE Renzo. He was nuts...and you are coming across as pretty fucking nuts, too.

This really has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, but it does raise certain interesting issues that point out the hypocrisy of the website owner and his mods. 1. Rules 2 and 3, while very precise, only apply to single men. Single women and couples are given a complete pass, though there are no explanations or clarification making that clear...at least in the case of single women. 2. What happens when a moderator has sex play on a child-safe cam? Nothing.

Your question is meaningless to me because I am not Elite and cannot write to anyone. But I am glad that you recognize that your logic is faulty and, therefore, your contention about Ann is suspect. You obviously know more about webpages and password protection than I do. It is unfortunate that you "shot yourself in the foot", so to speak.

I find your logic to be deficient...and here's why: I, myself, have a habit of opening a bunch of cams first...then taking my time to look at them all. I might end up with the cam of some naked man open for 10 minutes or more...before I've even taken a look at it. By your logic, that would mean that I like to look at naked men, but I assure you that I don't. Now...things would be different if I carried on a conversation with that naked man for 10 minutes. Have you ever seen Ann do that? Has she ever expressed interest to a naked man about what he is doing on his cam? Sorry, but so far you haven't given me anything that would make me doubt Ann's denial to your contentions.

Are you saying that Renzo cannot see her website? How would you know? Now you need a password to enter her page. That means, we all can't open it. Ahhh...Thanks, Forumadd. I had not looked at her page since yesterday and didn't know she pw-protected it.

I've always thought that the best policy is to just tell the truth and give credible evidence of that truth. Of course, some will believe you...some won't. Everyone has that choice. You, however, can be content knowing that you did tell the truth. I'm at a loss as to why you think Ann should respond in this forum. She has already responded on her own website. Isn't that enough for you? Hmmm...your only rebuttal to Ann's denial of your unsubstantiated claim is to question whether looking at naked men is a bad thing or not? Sorry, but that does nothing to convince me of the veracity of your contention about her. Wait...let me be sure I'm understanding you here. You say that Ann has looked at some cam...seen a guy beating his meat...warned him that he is breaking the rules...and, somehow, you get the idea that she likes to look at naked men on their cam? Heck, I've seen a lot of people do that very same thing...including mods. I've got to say that your claim about Ann is based on very flimsy evidence.

Are you saying that Renzo cannot see her website? How would you know?

You may have known, or had a good suspicion about Saldobrazo, but not all of us...me, at least...did. I'm glad she outed him. Until he confirms or denies...and probably even after he does...it will change the way I react to his posts. As far as Ann feeling she needs to defend herself, I don't really get that idea at all. She doesn't react or respond to much of what is said here. In this case, though, it was something said by her nemesis, Renzo. That's probably a special situation for her.

I have received information from confidential sources that Ann now has her web site back online...at a different url. http://ladyrose00.wix.com/ladyrose It's pretty much the same site that she had before, though there is one interesting addition: Now...what we have here is Ann's contention that Saldobraso is, in reality, Renzo...the guy who stalked her and caused her so much trouble. So far, we only have Ann's word. I await a confirmation or denial from Saldobraso. But, to be honest, if it come to a denial from him, I would be more inclined to believe Ann's word. In any case, she has given her answer concerning his claim that she looks at naked men on ww.com/camarades.com. I do find it interesting that, given Saldobraso's request from some days past... ...she did, though it may not be what he was looking for. LOL!!

Speculation is one thing. Heck, I speculate as well. But when you start throwing your speculation around as incontrovertible fact...as the OP did...then you'd better be prepared to back it up. Just saying, "I know this is true, but I can't tell you how I know.", won't cut it.

Just thought I'd pass this on to y'all. Bath time. https://www.firedrive.com/file/F2F41F394FC5C411

I think they are both below 22.

as you wish. I can't reveal any more, so I guess I will forever be the guy who talks shit. Until others discover as well. They clearly do not plan every minute of their days together, but there is an overall plan, to which they have all subscribed. It all originates in Ukraine, that's the link between all the couples and the place they all connect back to. Enough said, believe or not. As I said...until you show evidence instead of just saying stuff, you won't be believed. Look...I'm not trying to get on your case or anything, but that's just the way it is. On any forum that I've been a member of...and I've been a member of a lot of forums...that's just the way it is. If you are going to try to pass something off as fact, you have to be prepared to bring on the evidence to back it up. Otherwise you might just as well not say anything. So...what's the connection between Ukraine and Spain?

You know, people say shit on the internet all the time. Anyone who has spent more than five minutes on the internet knows this. Now...you can say any shit you want to, but that's all it is without some kind of verifiable evidence. So, I'm sure you'll understand...and won't be too surprised...if I include your contentions with all the rest of the shit I've seen on the internet. Tell you what...I'll make it real simple for you. Show me how Alina knows and colludes with Diana, since they live in two different cities. Or, maybe, how Diana knows and colludes with Isabel, since they live in different countries and speak different languages. So, dude...put up or forever be known as the guy who talks shit.

So...there really isn't a story here. Just you...not telling everything you know...saying she has looked at naked men on ww.com. Okay. I hope you don't mind that I'll reserve my acceptance of your contention until I see more concrete evidence.