Jump to content

Cam Shows for Matilda & Martynas


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, pahman said:

Looks like @Amy3 has a subscription......cheers 😎

To CB, yes! I'm Amy3. Matilda is a sweetheart! They don't pretend to be a voyeur site, so no harm no foul.

To VHTV, not likely ever again! Now, if they decided to actually be a voyeur site again, then there is a possibility. But, not when they demolish the notion of voyeurism with their ad tactics, panty selling scheme, and the things they allow the managers, tenants, and guest to do get away with. In the beginning they acted like they were going to try and preserve the notion of voyeurism. It was going to be on edge, but it was to be preserved. But every step of the way they instead followed the money. That's fine, make money, but it's not voyeurism anymore here. It's exactly what James said that they weren't going to be, a site that hosts camstars who work the cams for money. They can call that voyeurism all they want to, but it's not. Just cause they host apts with bad lighting doesn't make it any less then the show it is, it just makes it a badly lite cam show. For a second there I thought that there was some hope. But the masks got me! Allowing people on a voyeur site to hide from the cams using masks is just a bridge too far for me. That's a slap in the face of voyeurism. So, the chances of me subbing again are likely nil. 

I'm here because I like CC and I like commenting about this stuff, but I don't wear pom poms. I'm just me doing my thing for good or for worse. Independent and free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

To CB, yes! I'm Amy3. Matilda is a sweetheart! They don't pretend to be a voyeur site, so no harm no foul.

To VHTV, not likely ever again! Now, if they decided to actually be a voyeur site again, then there is a possibility. But, not when they demolish the notion of voyeurism with their ad tactics, panty selling scheme, and the things they allow the managers, tenants, and guest to do get away with. In the beginning they acted like they were going to try and preserve the notion of voyeurism. It was going to be on edge, but it was to be preserved. But every step of the way they instead followed the money. That's fine, make money, but it's not voyeurism anymore here. It's exactly what James said that they weren't going to be, a site that hosts camstars who work the cams for money. They can call that voyeurism all they want to, but it's not. Just cause they host apts with bad lighting doesn't make it any less then the show it is, it just makes it a badly lite cam show. For a second there I thought that there was some hope. But the masks got me! Allowing people on a voyeur site to hide from the cams using masks is just a bridge too far for me. That's a slap in the face of voyeurism. So, the chances of me subbing again are likely nil. 

I'm here because I like CC and I like commenting about this stuff, but I don't wear pom poms. I'm just me doing my thing for good or for worse. Independent and free!

We will never agree on the meaning of voyeurism. But that is fine. I was just teasing you about a subscription on VH because the pics you took from Chaturbate looked like caps from VH. :rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pahman said:

We will never agree on the meaning of voyeurism. But that is fine. I was just teasing you about a subscription on VH because the pics you took from Chaturbate looked like caps from VH. :rolleyes:

Yes, I suppose the meaning of voyeurism much in the eye of the beholder. To this beholder though, VHTV is not, not by a long shot. Just a poorly lit version of live action porn where the actors have to live there in between acts. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

What did she do in the private show that was special?

I didn't see it all, so I don't know if she did anything special, but something
was done to her. Some asshole cheated her out of an agreed upon tip after 
she did what he asked and made her cry. She left the room a couple of times
and, from what I understand, her BF wasn't very sympathetic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...