Jump to content

Comments & Quotes from Picture & Video Topics - Related to Removed Content (2019)


Recommended Posts

have a few objections about links that posted by pornlink and on his site and other sites similar to them..

  • .it's related about the videos who has uploaded on their platform, who has done recorded on it by other users! 
  • they don't pointing to the users who has done recorded it.
  •  they post the links of that videos in all topics of videos without referring to the member who has posted it and without any permission.

then, my suggest is if that possible can the admin or Mod demand to them  to create an topic for that links,and let the visitors decide freely to go to those sites..

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, just man said:

have a few objections about links that posted by pornlink and on his site and other sites similar to them..

  • .it's related about the videos who has uploaded on their platform, who has done recorded on it by other users! 
  • they don't pointing to the users who has done recorded it.
  •  they post the links of that videos in all topics of videos without referring to the member who has posted it and without any permission.

then, my suggest is if that possible can the admin or Mod demand to them  to create an topic for that links,and let the visitors decide freely to go to those sites..

It is what I have already suggested but it seems that, for the admin and moderators, pornlink is a good guy and all he does is OK. Pornlink seems to be Mother Teresa for them and others that are just interested in getting more vids without any concerns about the behaviour of some guys.

===> To letdothis,   goggism just "suggest" , if you know the real meaning of the words.

So I "suggest" to you better reading and understanding of what you read even if your goal is the support for pornlink.

 

It's just a suggestion 😁. I suppose you 'll still post same kind of comments and support, so let others say what they want when they write better than you read.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, just man said:

have a few objections about links that posted by pornlink and on his site and other sites similar to them..

  • .it's related about the videos who has uploaded on their platform, who has done recorded on it by other users! 
  • they don't pointing to the users who has done recorded it.
  •  they post the links of that videos in all topics of videos without referring to the member who posted it and without any permission.

then, my suggest is if that possible can the admin or Mod demand to them  to create an topic for that links,and let the visitors decide freely to go to those sites..

11

Just Man, you've always seemed like a reasonable person, but none of
this makes much sense to me.

First, you say you have a few objections, but all of your objections are
the same. They all refer to not giving credit to who recorded or posted
the video. Then you say let the visitors choose what site they go to, but
everyone already freely decides where they want to go. No one forces
anyone to go to any site or click on any link in this forum.

I fail to understand why this is a problem, at all. Pornlink has done
absolutely nothing wrong and, as this site's administrators have already
stated, hotscopes is a completely safe site. And, he makes not a penny
from anyone who downloads anything from hotscopes.

So he posts videos from other sites. So what? There are dozens of other
sites that do exactly the same thing. They poach videos from other sites,
including CC, and put them on their own sites. And, they are legion.

  • joyshub.com
  • pornhd6k.net
  • reallifecamhd.com
  • reallifecam.vip
  • rlcreplay,com

And, the list goes on and on. Even Mittsy posts videos he finds on other
sites, as he has said many times. Do you think these sites give credit to
or ask permission for any of the videos they post from other sites? Not
once.

Why do you think that is? It's very simple. Because the person who
records or posts any RLC content does not own that content. RLC is
the sole owner of all their content that gets posted anywhere. In fact,
anyone, except RLC, who has ever posted any RLC content anywhere
has been in violation of international copyright law.

In other words, you can't steal something from someone who doesn't
legally own it, so no credit or permission is needed. Do you think the
police ask permission of the thief before they take back the painting
he stole from the museum?

And, all of these sites are businesses and the goal of every business is
to make money. Otherwise, they go out of business. So, they all serve
ads in some way. Even CC serves up ads on this site. And, business is
nothing if not competitive. They all look for that better mousetrap and
if they find that leg up on their competition, you can be sure they use it.

Now, do I care that people post content that doesn't belong to them?
HELL NO. I'm just as interested in that content as the next guy. An
you'd have to go a long way and search a long time to find someone
more grateful for and who has more respect for those who post RLC
content, than me, no matter who they are or where it's posted.

And, IMHO, you guys need to find something worthy of an argument.
Maybe world hunger or human trafficking or genocide or drugs or
hundreds of other subjects because this is a non-issue.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Yalche said:

===> To letdothis,   goggism just "suggest" , if you know the real meaning of the words. 

I knew someone would say just what you said. IMO, his "suggestion"
was a sarcastic demand. But, even if it was a "suggestion" it's still
not his "suggestion" to make. He can't tell, suggest, demand, expect,
etc., that a user posts the way he thinks they should. Or, that they
only post what aligns with his beliefs. As I said, leave the oversight
to the moderators.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, pornlink said:

LEORA is watching porn on PHONE not PAUL.

I do not think she is watching porn, she gets excited of some music videos. Remember from now on, if you write he, it is a man like Paul, a woman like Leora is she.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yalche said:

So I "suggest" to you better reading and understanding of what you read even if your goal is the support for pornlink.

My goal was to support this forum. What I said to Goggism had nothing
to do with Pornlink. I'd have said the same thing no matter who he made
that remark to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Calle said:

I do not think she is watching porn, she gets excited of some music videos. Remember from now on, if you write he, it is a man like Paul, a woman like Leora is she.

when i work i prefer music vids for company than porn ones..... she is working for rlc... so its easy my friend lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pornlink said:

She start masturbate. You masturbate when watch music videos?

No, I don´t masturbate when watching music videos. And twice no, I do not masturbate as I do not have to, and I do not watch music videos from my phone.

You are quite new on RLC/CC, maybe you have not seen Leora dancing while watching her music videos, and that dancing - very erotic - has always led to masturbation. Always a great show, from one to two hours.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎2‎/‎4‎/‎2019 at 6:05 AM, letsdothis said:

Just Man, you've always seemed like a reasonable person, but none of
this makes much sense to me.

First, you say you have a few objections, but all of your objections are
the same. They all refer to not giving credit to who recorded or posted
the video. Then you say let the visitors choose what site they go to, but
everyone already freely decides where they want to go. No one forces
anyone to go to any site or click on any link in this forum.

I fail to understand why this is a problem, at all. Pornlink has done
absolutely nothing wrong and, as this site's administrators have already
stated, hotscopes is a completely safe site. And, he makes not a penny
from anyone who downloads anything from hotscopes.

So he posts videos from other sites. So what? There are dozens of other
sites that do exactly the same thing. They poach videos from other sites,
including CC, and put them on their own sites. And, they are legion.

  • joyshub.com
  • pornhd6k.net
  • reallifecamhd.com
  • reallifecam.vip
  • rlcreplay,com

And, the list goes on and on. Even Mittsy posts videos he finds on other
sites, as he has said many times. Do you think these sites give credit to
or ask permission for any of the videos they post from other sites? Not
once.

Why do you think that is? It's very simple. Because the person who
records or posts any RLC content does not own that content. RLC is
the sole owner of all their content that gets posted anywhere. In fact,
anyone, except RLC, who has ever posted any RLC content anywhere
has been in violation of international copyright law.

In other words, you can't steal something from someone who doesn't
legally own it, so no credit or permission is needed. Do you think the
police ask permission of the thief before they take back the painting
he stole from the museum?

And, all of these sites are businesses and the goal of every business is
to make money. Otherwise, they go out of business. So, they all serve
ads in some way. Even CC serves up ads on this site. And, business is
nothing if not competitive. They all look for that better mousetrap and
if they find that leg up on their competition, you can be sure they use it.

Now, do I care that people post content that doesn't belong to them?
HELL NO. I'm just as interested in that content as the next guy. An
you'd have to go a long way and search a long time to find someone
more grateful for and who has more respect for those who post RLC
content, than me, no matter who they are or where it's posted.

And, IMHO, you guys need to find something worthy of an argument.
Maybe world hunger or human trafficking or genocide or drugs or
hundreds of other subjects because this is a non-issue.

Well, I 'll start of the last points which you said it, it's unnatural if claimed to solve the problem of world hunger or drugs or any disaster's has been occurred or  will occurring in that a world  on these forums,even if i had objections about any disaster, i would go to on the place his, for discussion it ..with Knowing that All these problems has begun a tiny and then getting bigger and bigger (such as water leakage from the roof of the house),all these problems doesn't been solved at their time & have been ignored it and have been placed in the files of  the drawers of the archive.
 but, i wouldn't came here to that thread unless if the CC has opened the mini UN security council on the videos topics.
about the problem of video's or content's that's which we all know that it belongs to the one owner is RLC,he's the owner of all copyright & he's has right to demanding for it,we all are agreeing till this point,even if had were used like a coverage to supporting  over and over to somebody..

As for the sites as you mentioned i had did visited to some of them at several times and found some videos that have already had been taken from here and been posted on their sites, but there is a big big difference on that it ,i had noticed on that, they don't remove the watermark of those videos,whether if it belonging to the owner RLC or watermark to those who recorded it and posted it here or somewhere else,like some of the videos  i or Hope85 or Mittsy or godfather Howard has did posted here...
for example take this link:
z6bg.png


with remark: the video has been deleted from the host,& this status are includes to most of those sites that you mentioned on that list,& as the general rule  as says of most thieves they were robbing in quietly without make any fuss or rants..
but what we have gets here and what we are trying to discuss for will be other case, it's about what some does what like exactly,he has taken of that videos and remove the watermark and he has uploaded it on his site,and came to here and posted all of links which related of that videos as like if he is the one who has recorded and he's the one who has taken an risk like as the banning, block off, and stalking on,i have to know at any viewpoint those guys look like has done the same thing,and on which rule they are so equal in a some views,for sure all of that works not ever clue to under of that definition..
and as the 1st thief,i had never seen another thief make a decision to come the house  of 1st robber to selling on his platform what he has stole it from him,had much enough of Tom & Jerry game, i don't want an extra  games..at the end we have been friends and will be friends no matter how different our opinions..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...