Thestarider Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 LAMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bean1111 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 On 1/18/2020 at 6:20 PM, Amy3 said: I'm a trans person, but I don't support the militant LGBTQ mafia or the Democrat party that uses them to steer votes their way for the sake of power. The LGBTQ community should be outside of the clutches of a single political party. At the core of conservativism is its acknowledgement that the individual is supreme. At the core of left is the idea that the government knows best and if only they could control more the better they can make things be. I reject that even if it comes at my own expense. If someone doesn't want to make a cake for me, then I don't want their fucking cake. I don't want to use the power of the government to make someone bake me a cake that they don't want to make because of their religion. I think the government should not be involved in marriage at all. I also don't believe that a transgendered person can ever be the opposite sex no matter what they do. We suffer from a concept known as gender dysphoria and that's all. I don't think of it as an illness, but more as a mode of thought that effects people like me at different levels. A non transgendered person ascribes to a gender role that matches their gender. When you buy clothes you buy clothes that are manly. You have a mode of thought too, it just happens to match your gender and so it's normal for you. I wouldn't call your need to purchase male products an illness. It's just how you think. Trans people are the same it's just that they feel more comfortable with things that are of the opposite sex. Bottom line is this, I don't want a union of LGBTQ bosses use the Democrat party to force issues. I think they are militant and I think they push things too far. I am a transgendered person. I AM NOT A VICTIM, and I refuse to allow so called LGBTQ leaders to speak for me. The Democrats don't give a shit about anything but power. So much of their platform is victim politics and I hate it. I don't want or need their help. This is the most important thing. 👇 And besides, even if the Democrats were good for LGBTQ people, the rest of their platform is abhorrent to me. I can't support a party like that. I'm not a one issue voter. There are 2 primary political parties in the USA. I am a Republican and I vote for Republicans because by in large I agree more with their platform then I do with the Democrats. There are many things that are way more important to me then my gender dysphoria. Amy I don't even know where to start. To start with I am not a registered Democratic or Republican. I also vote based on the candidate. Probably vote for more republicans than democrats. "The Democrats don't give a shit about anything but power" Trump is the most power hungry President ever. He has said on numerous times I am the President I will do what I want. "the core of left is the idea that the government knows best and if only they could control more the better they can make things be" This is a generalization, (except for Bernie} Trump hasn't decrease government spending in this three years in office. The national debt is at one of its highest points ever. The economy is doing well because of spending remember this from your economy classes. It like have an unlimited credit card, you feel rich, however it has to be paid back. The US is headed for a major depression like we never seen before. I admit I am not a fan of socialism, however I do believe in helping those that really need help. "I think the government should not be involved in marriage at all." I agree however why is the republican party opposed to Same sex marriages? I think this election and impeachment is a lot bigger than Republican vs Democrat. Trump has taken the Presidency and the US to all time lows as far as morals and ethics. The constitution doesn't mater to the senators who only vote along party lines. Karma is going to bite the republican's in the ass when the tables are turned. Just remember decorates aren't all stupid. They will figure out how to use the electoral college in 2020 and still win the popular vote. The US is divided and I am not sure we will ever recover. I have a hard time believing that you are anything more than a republican who only votes along party lines, like many of the others one this site. This is what really bothers me in reading posting on this site. Every attack on Trump gets a response trying to blame the democrats, Trump is the president and should be held to a higher standard. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bean1111 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 On 1/17/2020 at 12:32 AM, Ridgerunner said: But they had begun an investigation of Burisma which was stopped when Joe Biden threatened to withhold U.S. government funds from Ukraine if the prosecutor investigating Burisma was not fired. And to quote Joe Biden in his bragging video, "... son of a bitch, he was fired." Burisma is the energy company in Ukraine where Hunter Biden was on the board of directors while Joe Biden was VP and had been assigned by Barack Obama to oversee operations in Ukraine. If you don't believe me watch the video of Biden on Youtube entitled, "Joe Biden Ukraine Video Bragging ". Viktor Shokin had much bigger issues than the corruption case against Mykola Zlochevsky. Almost immediately after he was appointed, he started to cause almost irreparable harm to Ukraine’s legal system. For starters, he failed to prosecute any prominent members of the Yanukovych regime or anybody in the current government. He constantly blocked reform to Ukraine’s broken legal system. He was in charge of implementing the 2014 law on prosecution which the European Union had asked Ukraine to do for years. The law aimed to reduce to role of prosecutors who “were absurdly superior to judges in the Soviet legal system that persisted in post-Soviet Ukraine” according to Atlantic Council. It also called for a reevaluation of all prosecutors in order to weed out the more corrupt and incompetent ones. Shokin manipulated the process so that the old system mostly remained the same and minimal, ineffective changes were implemented. He was the largest obstacle to judicial reform in Ukraine. It wasn’t just Joe Biden calling for his ouster, it was the United States government and the European Union. Steven Pifer, a career foreign service officer who was ambassador to Ukraine under President Bill Clinton, told Politifact that “”virtually everyone” he knew in the U.S. government and virtually all non-governmental experts on Ukraine “felt that Shokin was not doing his job and should be fired. As far as I can recall, they all concurred with the vice president telling Poroshenko that the U.S. government would not extend the $1 billion loan guarantee to Ukraine until Shokin was removed from office.”” The European Union also called for him to be fired and celebrated his removal. “This decision creates an opportunity to make a fresh start in the prosecutor general’s office. I hope that the new prosecutor general will ensure that [his] office . . . becomes independent from political influence and pressure and enjoys public trust,” said Jan Tombinski, the EU’s envoy to Ukraine, in a statement at the time. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bean1111 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 On 1/15/2020 at 6:29 PM, Ridgerunner said: Mueller report said there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians to meddle in the 2016 election. But Hillary did use foreign sources to smear Trump and his campaign. It was Barr not the Mueller report who said no collusion: As the report takes pains to point out, “collusion” has no legal definition and is not a federal crime. So while the report did not establish conspiracy or coordination, it does not make a determination on “collusion” — and in fact, it strongly suggests that there was at least an attempt to collude by Trump’s campaign and agents of the Russian government. The fact that it did not rise to the level of criminal activity does not mean it was not a serious breach of trust and a damning indictment of the president’s commitment to the health of the American legal and political system. The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUCK YOU ALL Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 hour ago, bean1111 said: It was Barr not the Mueller report who said no collusion: As the report takes pains to point out, “collusion” has no legal definition and is not a federal crime. So while the report did not establish conspiracy or coordination, it does not make a determination on “collusion” — and in fact, it strongly suggests that there was at least an attempt to collude by Trump’s campaign and agents of the Russian government. The fact that it did not rise to the level of criminal activity does not mean it was not a serious breach of trust and a damning indictment of the president’s commitment to the health of the American legal and political system. The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics. I hear you loud and clear, but the MAGAts are like talking to a brick wall. They hate the truth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUCK YOU ALL Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Ex-Bush Aide Matthew Dowd: GOP Would Have Removed Obama If He Did 'One-tenth Of What Trump Has Done' | Crooks and Liars CROOKSANDLIARS.COM A former strategist for former President George W. Bush accused Republican lawmakers of hypocrisy on Sunday for for failing to honestly consider the... Fucking right they would have.....and don't think for one second they weren't digging. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 3 hours ago, bean1111 said: Amy I don't even know where to start. To start with I am not a registered Democratic or Republican. I also vote based on the candidate. Probably vote for more republicans than democrats. "The Democrats don't give a shit about anything but power" Trump is the most power hungry President ever. He has said on numerous times I am the President I will do what I want. "the core of left is the idea that the government knows best and if only they could control more the better they can make things be" This is a generalization, (except for Bernie} Trump hasn't decrease government spending in this three years in office. The national debt is at one of its highest points ever. The economy is doing well because of spending remember this from your economy classes. It like have an unlimited credit card, you feel rich, however it has to be paid back. The US is headed for a major depression like we never seen before. I admit I am not a fan of socialism, however I do believe in helping those that really need help. "I think the government should not be involved in marriage at all." I agree however why is the republican party opposed to Same sex marriages? I think this election and impeachment is a lot bigger than Republican vs Democrat. Trump has taken the Presidency and the US to all time lows as far as morals and ethics. The constitution doesn't mater to the senators who only vote along party lines. Karma is going to bite the republican's in the ass when the tables are turned. Just remember decorates aren't all stupid. They will figure out how to use the electoral college in 2020 and still win the popular vote. The US is divided and I am not sure we will ever recover. I have a hard time believing that you are anything more than a republican who only votes along party lines, like many of the others one this site. This is what really bothers me in reading posting on this site. Every attack on Trump gets a response trying to blame the democrats, Trump is the president and should be held to a higher standard. And I still believe you are slick talking card carrying Democrat hack. And Democrats didn't vote along party lines in the House of Representatives on impeachment? Democrats had said they were going to impeach Trump long before any of this Ukraine hoax ever came up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, trump45sucks said: Ex-Bush Aide Matthew Dowd: GOP Would Have Removed Obama If He Did 'One-tenth Of What Trump Has Done' | Crooks and Liars CROOKSANDLIARS.COM A former strategist for former President George W. Bush accused Republican lawmakers of hypocrisy on Sunday for for failing to honestly consider the... Fucking right they would have.....and don't think for one second they weren't digging. Dowd is just another Republican never -Trumper who is probably still pissed that Trump kicked Jeb Bush's ass in the 2016 Republican primary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, bean1111 said: It was Barr not the Mueller report who said no collusion: As the report takes pains to point out, “collusion” has no legal definition and is not a federal crime. So while the report did not establish conspiracy or coordination, it does not make a determination on “collusion” — and in fact, it strongly suggests that there was at least an attempt to collude by Trump’s campaign and agents of the Russian government. The fact that it did not rise to the level of criminal activity does not mean it was not a serious breach of trust and a damning indictment of the president’s commitment to the health of the American legal and political system. The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics. You are playing with words. If there was no conspiracy, then there was no collusion. Prosecutors prosecute people for committing crimes, they exonerate no one. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ooopel Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 12 hours ago, Ridgerunner said: I think you've been smoking too much weed and popping too many pills. ...and you just had prove it! why the Aliens were made that decision to comes to this Earth! it's the same language who Mr Trump and his supporters still they are using of it! he make his supporters talks like a robot's without used any cells of their Brain..oh man! that brain has created for used to get control on your tongue words and to used him for thinking! !so! forgive me if i said don't make Mr trump it makes you used your foot for thinking!it's not worthy from you and it actually very bad idea.😏 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 3 hours ago, bean1111 said: Viktor Shokin had much bigger issues than the corruption case against Mykola Zlochevsky. Almost immediately after he was appointed, he started to cause almost irreparable harm to Ukraine’s legal system. For starters, he failed to prosecute any prominent members of the Yanukovych regime or anybody in the current government. He constantly blocked reform to Ukraine’s broken legal system. He was in charge of implementing the 2014 law on prosecution which the European Union had asked Ukraine to do for years. The law aimed to reduce to role of prosecutors who “were absurdly superior to judges in the Soviet legal system that persisted in post-Soviet Ukraine” according to Atlantic Council. It also called for a reevaluation of all prosecutors in order to weed out the more corrupt and incompetent ones. Shokin manipulated the process so that the old system mostly remained the same and minimal, ineffective changes were implemented. He was the largest obstacle to judicial reform in Ukraine. It wasn’t just Joe Biden calling for his ouster, it was the United States government and the European Union. Steven Pifer, a career foreign service officer who was ambassador to Ukraine under President Bill Clinton, told Politifact that “”virtually everyone” he knew in the U.S. government and virtually all non-governmental experts on Ukraine “felt that Shokin was not doing his job and should be fired. As far as I can recall, they all concurred with the vice president telling Poroshenko that the U.S. government would not extend the $1 billion loan guarantee to Ukraine until Shokin was removed from office.”” The European Union also called for him to be fired and celebrated his removal. “This decision creates an opportunity to make a fresh start in the prosecutor general’s office. I hope that the new prosecutor general will ensure that [his] office . . . becomes independent from political influence and pressure and enjoys public trust,” said Jan Tombinski, the EU’s envoy to Ukraine, in a statement at the time. And I don't trust Pifer any farther than I could throw him because the Clinton's were also up to their necks in Ukraine corruption. And what happened to the investigation of Burisma after Shokin was fired? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgerunner Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, ooopel said: ...and you just had prove it! why the Aliens were made that decision to comes to this Earth! it's the same language who Mr Trump and his supporters still they are using of it! he make his supporters talks like a robot's without used any cells of their Brain..oh man! that brain has created for used to get control on your tongue words and to used him for thinking! !so! forgive me if i said don't make Mr trump it makes you used your foot for thinking!it's not worthy from you and it actually very bad idea.😏 I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts