Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Max Ragnar said:

And the people will suffer not the leaders.

The people always suffer.  The rich and elite will get richer and poor will be even poorer after this is all done.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Max Ragnar said:

Like the baby bottle factory Clinton liberated, like Iraq and the non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

People behind the scenes are pushing people's buttons to get a war. The Covid deal will evolve into a war to get citizens afraid, compliant and then a one world government.

If what you write is in fact true then remove NATO ships from the Black Sea and off the coast of Iran. Why provoke a fight? Because while they declare peace they want war. Not the people, but the leaders.

Biden loves this as it serves as a distraction to his pole numbers. Wars unit people.

 

Your history is inaccurate. The " baby bottle incident" was 1991. George HW Bush was president not Clinton. The weapons of mass destruction claim again Bush not Clinton. Me thinks your kool-aid has been spiked by trolls.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ddhothot said:

They'll also get involved in humanitarian situations such as Bosnian and Yugoslavian wars in the 90's. 

Bring everyone rice and water while the senders sit back and have steak and potatoes and drink beer. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
Just now, StnCld316 said:

The people always suffer.  The rich and elite will get richer and poor will be even poorer after this is all done.  

Leaders want a legacy, Clinton said he regretted never having a war to fight and win. WTF. A legacy built on one's country men's blood is no legacy.

The military is the one to disobey the leaders and tell them to fight their own wars. But the generals are afraid of their careers to say no. So they command their men to kill people they personally have no beef with to save their careers and give their political leaders what they want, good or bad. Stupid. Cowardly.

Posted
3 minutes ago, horseshoejerry said:

Your history is inaccurate. The " baby bottle incident" was 1991. George HW Bush was president not Clinton. The weapons of mass destruction claim again Bush not Clinton. Me thinks your kool-aid has been spiked by trolls.

No. Kosovo-Clinton.  Mythcal weapons of mass destruction was King George II

Posted
13 minutes ago, ddhothot said:

They'll also get involved in humanitarian situations such as Bosnian and Yugoslavian wars in the 90's. 

That was actually the UN using NATO as it's police force... It's funny the UN never uses China or Russia as it's police....

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Max Ragnar said:

Leaders want a legacy, Clinton said he regretted never having a war to fight and win. WTF. A legacy built on one's country men's blood is no legacy.

The military is the one to disobey the leaders and tell them to fight their own wars. But the generals are afraid of their careers to say no. So they command their men to kill people they personally have no beef with to save their careers and give their political leaders what they want, good or bad. Stupid. Cowardly.

 

It is always easy for leaders to send someone else’s son, daughter, father or mother to die in the quest to secure their legacy, but never risk their own blood relatives.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

Bring everyone rice and water while the senders sit back and have steak and potatoes and drink beer. 

Along with a few airstrikes too.

But yes in principle NATO are a defensive/protection organisation who only get involved if they have to, I'm hoping this war doesn't expand to needing that. Unfortunately it's those making the decisions who suffer least, and normal folk who suffer for their actions.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...