B1 - General Topic 2022 #14 (April)

[corvette08]

32 minutes ago, Thestarider said:

Nonsense is these two are on a VOYEUR PORN SITE getting paid good money and acting like a couple of little middle school girls just going through puberty.

I couldn't have said it better. 👍 Some people just don't get it. 

[Alladino]

4 minutes ago, costa049 said:

Just because a girl, who is naturally leaving her private life, hasn't had sex or hasn't sex or bated on cams, it doesn't mean she is a-sexual or that she doesn't have value as a woman. You guys really need to stop objectifying girls and respect them more. Who posts garbage then?

 

What about respect for the paying customers?

Seriously now. RLC is a voyeur site and puts a motto on their website that reads: "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE". Of course, people are upset when so many girls do little or nothing sexual there or just give silly bullshit shows. It makes no sense when the girls are there for months in these apartments without any sex and not even a masturbation. RLC should be realistic, which means no shows, but also not censorship and hiding the sex life.

 

 

[costa049]

5 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

What about respect for the paying customers?

Seriously now. RLC is a voyeur site and puts a motto on their website that reads: "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE". Of course, people are upset when so many girls do little or nothing sexual there or just give silly bullshit shows. It makes no sense when the girls are there for months in these apartments without any sex and not even a masturbation. RLC should be realistic, which means no shows, but also not censorship and hiding the sex life.

 

 

RLC doesn't censor anything. It is the tenants' own decision to have sex or bate or not, which they end up doing, sooner or later. And what if they just don't do it? It shouldn't define them or give them more or less value, since they are living their private life and aren't obligated to do anything. End of discussion.

[StnCld316]

11 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

What about respect for the paying customers?

Seriously now. RLC is a voyeur site and puts a motto on their website that reads: "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE". Of course, people are upset when so many girls do little or nothing sexual there or just give silly bullshit shows. It makes no sense when the girls are there for months in these apartments without any sex and not even a masturbation. RLC should be realistic, which means no shows, but also not censorship and hiding the sex life.

 

 

If you look on RLC's website, there is nowhere within anything on their website that states that tenants are obligated to enter into any sexual encounters. It simply states that it could happen not that it will happen. Viewers just expect these activities to happen.

If they do have a sexual encounter happen then the viewer got a bonus.

[Alladino]

5 minutes ago, costa049 said:

RLC doesn't censor anything. It is the tenants' own decision to have sex or bate or not, which they end up doing, sooner or later. And what if they just don't do it? It shouldn't define them or give them more or less value, since they are living their private life and aren't obligated to do anything. End of discussion.

 

The problem with RLC is that they have so many girls who are as good as or even not sexually active in the apartments. This is completely normal for a guest, but for people who live there for months just completely unrealistic.

Of course, it is their free decision what they do or do not do. I have never claimed otherwise. However, the point is that they should be fair enough not to be in RLC if they are not willing to actually be part in the project for real.

[costa049]

3 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

The problem with RLC is that they have so many girls who are as good as or even not sexually active in the apartments. This is completely normal for a guest, but for people who live there for months just completely unrealistic.

Of course, it is their free decision what they do or do not do. I have never claimed otherwise. However, the point is that they should be fair enough not to be in RLC if they are not willing to actually be part in the project for real.

If you want sexual content 24/7 at your choice, you have other sites for that. 😉

[costa049]

10 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

If you look on RLC's website, there is nowhere within anything on their website that states that tenants are obligated to enter into any sexual encounters. It simply states that it could happen not that it will happen. Viewers just expect these activities to happen.

If they do have a sexual encounter happen then the viewer got a bonus.

You just said everything st. 👌

[Alladino]

Just now, costa049 said:

If you want sexual content 24/7 at your choice, you have other sites for that. 😉

 

Now don't twist my words. I was clearly talking about the fact that there are many girls in GOV who never or almost never do anything during the months they are there.  I have always said that patience is part of being a voyeur. Only if the general mindset of a girl is that she censors her private life out of the apartment, then you can wait forever because nothing will ever happen. That is the problem.

 

[costa049]

14 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

Now don't twist my words. I was clearly talking about the fact that there are many girls in GOV who never or almost never do anything during the months they are there.  I have always said that patience is part of being a voyeur. Only if the general mindset of a girl is that she censors her private life out of the apartment, then you can wait forever because nothing will ever happen. That is the problem.

 

You are right in almost everything you said. But again, what they do or not do is their own decision and we have to comment and speculate about what happens on cams or what will happen when they come back from outside.

[Alladino]

3 minutes ago, costa049 said:

You are right in almost everything you said. But again, what they do or not do is their own decision and we have to comment and speculate about what happens on cams or what will happen when they come back from outside. We can only judge them for their behavior on cams towards other people.

 

We can also use our common sense and take into account that we are not at a court hearing here.

Can't you see why it's a problem on a voyeur site like RLC when so many girls in GOV despite months long stay do nothing or almost nothing sexual that the cameras see. The girls are young, healthy, mostly good looking, they will surely have a sexual life.

[costa049]

7 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

We can also use our common sense and take into account that we are not at a court hearing here.

Can't you see why it's a problem on a voyeur site like RLC when so many girls in GOV despite months long stay do nothing or almost nothing sexual that the cameras see. The girls are young, healthy, mostly good looking, they will surely have a sexual life.

Again, you were right in almost everything you said. It isn't a problem, it is what is is. As @StnCld316rightly said, viewers just expect those things to happen on cams, and if they happen, which is highly likely, it is a bonus. And as you rightly said, they are young and healthy and will surely have a sexual life.

[Alladino]

1 minute ago, costa049 said:

Again, you were almost right in everything you said. It isn't a problem, it is what is is. As @StnCld316rightly said, viewers just expect those things to happen on cams, and if they happen, it is a bonus.

 

Sorry, I do not share your opinion. RLC describes itself as a site that gives an insight into the private lives of residents. Real life is not a bonus, but the intended content.

To believe that they just don't have sex and don't even masturbate is naive.  As I said, these are young girls, healthy and good-looking. It is very obvious that some of the girls just have their sex off camera only. That is an issue and RLC should try to find girls actually ready to be a part in the project. It doesn't have to be the do notning girls.