General Talk

[dougiestyle4u]

I believe past RLC tenants from 5 to 10 years ago were more "eye candy", more interesting and fun to follow and more of the "voyeur" type. Just my opinion. I do miss some of them.

[Brit Guy]

8 participants all on vacay and not a fucking sausage happening on cam right now. I've never known RLC be this bad before ...wow. 

[dougiestyle4u]

22 minutes ago, Brit Guy said:

I've never known RLC be this bad before ...wow.

RLC sucks more than the female tenants do.

[Brit Guy]

19 minutes ago, dougiestyle4u said:

RLC sucks more than the female tenants do.

I think RLC will eventually close the website and invest everything they have in Xlife where participants sign up with their own recording equipment and everyone just hopes for best. The couples can already be viewed from Xlife so all RLC has to do is propose a plan for those living in RLC rented places (L&T and a few others) and it will be a case of either telling them to 'like it or lump it.' 

RLC 'could' remain but with just the Barce arm of the business where viewers pay as we do now but far lower due to all the 'couples' places being removed. Bring in more guys to fuck and rock the boat a bit ...great viewing if you ask me. 

Okay I pulled this out of thin air BUT ...is it possible, probably yes. 

[chogdad]

19 minutes ago, Brit Guy said:

I think RLC will eventually close the website and invest everything they have in Xlife where participants sign up with their own recording equipment and everyone just hopes for best. The couples can already be viewed from Xlife so all RLC has to do is propose a plan for those living in RLC rented places (L&T and a few others) and it will be a case of either telling them to 'like it or lump it.' 

RLC 'could' remain but with just the Barce arm of the business where viewers pay as we do now but far lower due to all the 'couples' places being removed. Bring in more guys to fuck and rock the boat a bit ...great viewing if you ask me. 

Okay I pulled this out of thin air BUT ...is it possible, probably yes. 

It's an interesting point about the crossover with XLife - Just WHY did that site contain all the single and couple apts that already exist on another site? Why exclude the Barcas? And why offer as the only alternative, apts which can be operated by the tenant themselves? 

What i'm getting at is - Who would sign up to XLife and NOT RLC?

The only thing that saves it all at the moment is the RLC apts.....Take them away and XLife is nothing. Take them away from RLC - That's another thing. 

So eventually to save XLife and save money is as you say, to remove all BUT the Barcas from RLC and have them ONLY on XLife. Then PLC is more like VH, where the Barcas get wilder etc. Otherwise, the whole point of a second site was futile. 

[Brit Guy]

11 minutes ago, chogdad said:

It's an interesting point about the crossover with XLife - Just WHY did that site contain all the single and couple apts that already exist on another site? Why exclude the Barcas? And why offer as the only alternative, apts which can be operated by the tenant themselves? 

What i'm getting at is - Who would sign up to XLife and NOT RLC?

The only thing that saves it all at the moment is the RLC apts.....Take them away and XLife is nothing. Take them away from RLC - That's another thing. 

So eventually to save XLife and save money is as you say, to remove all BUT the Barcas from RLC and have them ONLY on XLife. Then PLC is more like VH, where the Barcas get wilder etc. Otherwise, the whole point of a second site was futile. 

I think we both make some good points but we both said is all quite possible. 

[chogdad]

1 minute ago, Brit Guy said:

I think we both make some good points 

I certainly did, yeah.