kris66 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 7 hours ago, Alladino said: The problem is not that she hasn't had sex with this one specific guy, but that she is very camera shy in general. It just doesn't make much sense to keep a girl like that in the cast if nothing will ever happen, even after months in the project. Moreover, I really don't understand why RLC is awarding the best room in B1 to her of all the girls. The other two girls in B1 have regular visitors, and Magan in particular is much better integrated socially with the other girls, so it makes little sense for Shantal to keep a room like this. It'a a problem for you that she wont spread legs. It's not a problem for me and probably also some other members. We too pay for it so nope it's not a problem for everyone 😉 Fact is some of you see this as a 100% porn site even though the name of the project is "Real-LIFE-cam"... Ergo some are shy (or just dont want to fuck on cam ending up all over the internet with spread legs) some aren't. That's real life 😉 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, kris66 said: It'a a problem for you that she wont spread legs. It's not a problem for me and probably also some other members. We too pay for it so nope it's not a problem for everyone 😉 Fact is some of you see this as a 100% porn site even though the name of the project is "Real-LIFE-cam"... Ergo some are shy (or just dont want to fuck on cam ending up all over the internet with spread legs) some aren't. That's real life 😉 I don't think we should confuse RLC with a normal porn site. At the same time, it is wrong to say that RLC is not a porn site. From my point of view RLC should be more than just porn. Also, The idea that non-participation in the project is necessary to be real life is wrong. From my point of view, the camera should have as little noticeable impact as possible. So, no girls who deliberately hold their genitals up to the cameras for hours (or are unrealistically naked all the time), but also no girls who hide their sex life from the camera. This results from the motto of showing the private lives of the residents, and is therefore somehow a must. For example, when Eva was still in the russian appartment, I had a lot of fun waiting for her to change her clothes, especially because she was usually dressed normally. There was a good camera for a very nice view. At the same time, there was the occasional sex, which, as you could see, was something the residents enjoyed. It is a balance, in combination with the right residents who are really involved in the project, that makes RLC quality. Shantal, is clearly holding back, which in my opinion is the opposite of what RLC needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeBitch Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 4 hours ago, Alladino said: I don't think we should confuse RLC with a normal porn site. At the same time, it is wrong to say that RLC is not a porn site. From my point of view RLC should be more than just porn. Also, The idea that non-participation in the project is necessary to be real life is wrong. From my point of view, the camera should have as little noticeable impact as possible. So, no girls who deliberately hold their genitals up to the cameras for hours (or are unrealistically naked all the time), but also no girls who hide their sex life from the camera. This results from the motto of showing the private lives of the residents, and is therefore somehow a must. For example, when Eva was still in the russian appartment, I had a lot of fun waiting for her to change her clothes, especially because she was usually dressed normally. There was a good camera for a very nice view. At the same time, there was the occasional sex, which, as you could see, was something the residents enjoyed. It is a balance, in combination with the right residents who are really involved in the project, that makes RLC quality. Shantal, is clearly holding back, which in my opinion is the opposite of what RLC needs. You wasting your time…some are happy to see a girl bend over 🤣🤣. Justifying what Shantal does and comparing her to Esmi is idiotic. Esmi did like 8-10 bates of which maybe half were really good. Shantal has done 100 and 2 of them were average for about 2 minutes 🤣🤣🤣. There was no issue seeing Esmi naked, Shantal always lays down in a way you can’t see shit. Shantal is useless 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cupid30 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 4 hours ago, zone51 said: 2 open bates on 9 months heum very impressive and some people want see her again this is crazy I understand better now why RLC is still alive after 11 years... Couldn't have said it any better,I've heard a member talk about hating shantals 'stupid hair and her big lips' another one said she should "go back to her village"so I know it's not just the fact that she does nothing is why she's hated so much! Esmi did just as much nothing as shantal is doing and she's loved! Crazy 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miscvoyeur Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, cupid30 said: Couldn't have said it any better,I've heard a member talk about hating shantals 'stupid hair and her big lips' another one said she should "go back to her village"so I know it's not just the fact that she does nothing is why she's hated so much! Esmi did just as much nothing as shantal is doing and she's loved! Crazy Just more examples of ignorance on this forum. Someone referred to certain people on this forum as being incels and I don't think there's a more perfect description of them; those who are so inferior in their own lives that they have jump on a forum and say nasty things about people they don't know just because they can't get their way. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cupid30 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said: Just more examples of ignorance on this forum. Someone referred to certain people on this forum as being incels and I don't think there's a more perfect description of them; those who are so inferior in their own lives that they have jump on a forum and say nasty things about people they don't know just because they can't get their way. Yes,they are sad and really pathetic,masha was a favorite for some until she slept with a particular ethnic group,she was called a "slut with A.I.D.S" afterwards.i know what to expect from certain members on camcaps! So I'm never surprised 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris66 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Alladino said: I don't think we should confuse RLC with a normal porn site. At the same time, it is wrong to say that RLC is not a porn site. From my point of view RLC should be more than just porn. Also, The idea that non-participation in the project is necessary to be real life is wrong. From my point of view, the camera should have as little noticeable impact as possible. So, no girls who deliberately hold their genitals up to the cameras for hours (or are unrealistically naked all the time), but also no girls who hide their sex life from the camera. This results from the motto of showing the private lives of the residents, and is therefore somehow a must. For example, when Eva was still in the russian appartment, I had a lot of fun waiting for her to change her clothes, especially because she was usually dressed normally. There was a good camera for a very nice view. At the same time, there was the occasional sex, which, as you could see, was something the residents enjoyed. It is a balance, in combination with the right residents who are really involved in the project, that makes RLC quality. Shantal, is clearly holding back, which in my opinion is the opposite of what RLC needs. Again, I doubt there's any legal demand from RLC's side for any girl to do what she does not feel comfortable doing. After all it's not a brothel or girl-slave-trading. And again the name is REAL-LIFE-cams. I totally get and support why a girl does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen. And you can dislike her as much as you want too and think she does not deserve to be in the apartment or in the project. Reality is that she deserve it as much as any other girl who think its all ok to be recorded spreading legs and probably be found for the rest of her life on real porn sites. It's not black & White and the girls you consider "not worthy" are probably worthy to other members me included. Furthermore you are advocating to kick these girls out on the street. Girls who might not have any other options at the moment while their country is being raped by a mad man! 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 35 minutes ago, kris66 said: Again, I doubt there's any legal demand from RLC's side for any girl to do what she does not feel comfortable doing. After all it's not a brothel or girl-slave-trading. And again the name is REAL-LIFE-cams. I totally get and support why a girl does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen. And you can dislike her as much as you want too and think she does not deserve to be in the apartment or in the project. Reality is that she deserve it as much as any other girl who think its all ok to be recorded spreading legs and probably be found for the rest of her life on real porn sites. It's not black & White and the girls you consider "not worthy" are probably worthy to other members me included. Furthermore you are advocating to kick these girls out on the street. Girls who might not have any other options at the moment while their country is being raped by a mad man! What is wrong with this forum. Who said anything about a "legal demand"? Nor has anyone here spoken of "brothel or girl-slave-trading"!! These are all things you have made up, and they make no sense for me whatsoever. Also, what I find totally ridiculous is the idea that a girl gets involved in a project like RLC, and then you seriously assume that it's perfectly understandable that she won't actually do anything because she "does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen". The simple, clear and obvious solution in this case is not to join in the project like RLC in the first place. How stupid one has to be not to recognise this simple truth. Completely absurd is your comment regarding "advocating to kick these girls out on the street". Do you really think the girls in the vacation apartment break down everything at there actual home for the few months they are there? This is ridiculos. Some of the girls even have quite obvious places to live nearby. Again, my only point is that the residents should participate in the project if they have chosen to be part of it. If they don't want to do that, then they should go. That is thier free decision. What annoys me are the do nothing girls who obviously just want to cash in without really contributing anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris66 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 11 minutes ago, Alladino said: What is wrong with this forum. Who said anything about a "legal demand"? Nor has anyone here spoken of "brothel or girl-slave-trading"!! These are all things you have made up, and they make no sense for me whatsoever. Also, what I find totally ridiculous is the idea that a girl gets involved in a project like RLC, and then you seriously assume that it's perfectly understandable that she won't actually do anything because she "does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen". The simple, clear and obvious solution in this case is not to join in the project like RLC in the first place. How stupid one has to be not to recognise this simple truth. Completely absurd is your comment regarding "advocating to kick these girls out on the street". Do you really think the girls in the vacation apartment break down everything at there actual home for the few months they are there? This is ridiculos. Some of the girls even have quite obvious places to live nearby. Again, my only point is that the residents should participate in the project if they have chosen to be part of it. If they don't want to do that, then they should go. That is thier free decision. What annoys me are the do nothing girls who obviously just want to cash in without really contributing anything. Again you can dislike a woman as much as you want and think you deserve the god given right to see her get fucked and see her pussy and if not she does not deserve to be in an apartment. Newsflash! Some other members just don't agree with you. Obviously you do not understand English very well or you would have understood my points without taking things personal (or maybe you just don't like the fact that not all people agree with you) 😉 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alladino Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, kris66 said: Again you can dislike a woman as much as you want and think you deserve the god goven right to see her get fucked and show you her pussy and if not she does not deserve to be in an apartment. Newsflash! Some other members just don't agree with you. Obviously you do not understand English very well or you would have understood my points without taking things personal (or maybe you just don't like the fac that not all people agree with you) 😉 Even though english is not my mother tongue, I understand very well what kind of nonsense you have written here, and in this case I specifically refer only to you. Again, Nobody wants to force the girls to do anything. The opposite is the case, I think RLC should be about the residents living as best they can as they would if there was no camera. You should also remember that participation in a project like RLC is an individual decision. If someone doesn't want those cameras, they shouldn't stay in an apartment with cameras. It's simple logic and no matter what nonsense you say it won't change. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noldus Posted August 2, 2023 Author Share Posted August 2, 2023 Dylan back in B1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mauri Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 28 minutes ago, Alladino said: Anche se l'inglese non è la mia lingua madre, capisco benissimo che tipo di sciocchezze hai scritto qui, e in questo caso mi riferisco espressamente solo a te. Ancora una volta, nessuno vuole costringere le ragazze a fare qualcosa. È vero il contrario, penso che RLC dovrebbe riguardare i residenti che vivono nel miglior modo possibile come farebbero se non ci fosse la telecamera. Dovresti anche ricordare che la partecipazione a un progetto come RLC è una decisione individuale. Se qualcuno non vuole quelle telecamere, non dovrebbe stare in un appartamento con telecamere. È semplice logica e non importa quali sciocchezze dici, non cambierà. RLC non e’ cio’ che credi che sia. RLC paga gli inquilini per abitare in un appartamento con delle telecamere, la quale dietro di esse ci sono delle persono che li guardano H24, nulla di piu’, tutto cio’ che succede all’interno e’ di decisione degli inquilini, questi appartamenti vengono utilizzati come tali, esattamente come tu usi la casa o chiunque altro, alcuni di loro lavorano, altri studiano, altri vogliono semplicemente farsi una vacanza, il fatto che ci siano delle telecamere, non significa che devono fare cose che non farebbero neanche senza telecamere, quando RLC fa’ firmare loro il contratto al loro arrivo, non dice che devono masturbarsi, scopare o fare chissa’ cosa, altrimenti molte ragazze non accetterebbero, credi che ragazze come Shantal, se non ci fossero telecamere, si comporterebbe in modo diverso? Io non credo, per il semplice motivo che se una persona e’ disinibita e esibizionista nella vita, per esempio Sambuka o Ashley, non avrebbe alcun problema a farlo anche con le telecamere. Il fatto che non fanno sesso, non vuol dire che non vivono il progetto o che non sono degne di stare qui, questo e’ voyeur e’ fa’ esattamente tutte le cose che deve fare e farebbe comunque senza telecamere. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts