Rachel (2024/2025) #1

[Noldus]

Rachel is back on Xlife.com

 

 

[Pete1960]

[johnny0692]

Rachel on free cam getting dressed after a shower 🚿 

IMG-0662 hosted at ImgBB

IBB.CO

---

Image IMG-0662 hosted in ImgBB

 

Edited November 5 by johnny0692

[luvdoggy1111]

Did she ever bate on RLC during her stay? Because here she never does! Maybe I expected too much, because I really like her. Two cams in the room and Rachel does nothing at all. Too bad...

[thinga69]

1 hour ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

Did she ever bate on RLC during her stay? Because here she never does! Maybe I expected too much, because I really like her. Two cams in the room and Rachel does nothing at all. Too bad...

She did a few times. Good ones. Watching lesbian porn IIRC.

[peterete123]

don't bother subscribing, she does nothing

[luvdoggy1111]

Rachel does seriously nothing in the apt. She never bates, now and then she is naked to get dressed. That's all. Huge disappointment. 

[moos54]

10 minutes ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

Rachel does seriously nothing in the apt. She never bates, now and then she is naked to get dressed. That's all. Huge disappointment. 

For me, the disappointment is not Rachel, because she is faithful to what she already did when she was a participant on rlc, but it is the Xlife project that is a disappointment, I still do not understand the concept of subscribing to a girl who only has cameras in her room or in apartments where we do not have access to the entirety of it, why no cameras in the bathrooms of Dayana or Aria and Leo? it is incomprehensible and for my part it does not even make me want to activate the two choices offered via my RLC subscription

in addition I find the interface of Xlife less good than that of RLC

[luvdoggy1111]

8 minutes ago, moos54 said:

For me, the disappointment is not Rachel, because she is faithful to what she already did when she was a participant on rlc, but it is the Xlife project that is a disappointment, I still do not understand the concept of subscribing to a girl who only has cameras in her room or in apartments where we do not have access to the entirety of it, why no cameras in the bathrooms of Dayana or Aria and Leo? it is incomprehensible and for my part it does not even make me want to activate the two choices offered via my RLC subscription

in addition I find the interface of Xlife less good than that of RLC

There is whole lot to improve at XLife, you are absolutely right. It isn't a fragment of RLC. RLC is much much better. Some apts at XLife are labeled as non nude but there are far more apts which are non nude and where literally nothing happens. In those apts the tenants are even hardly there, like Lulufrancaise. 

[thinga69]

2 hours ago, moos54 said:

For me, the disappointment is not Rachel, because she is faithful to what she already did when she was a participant on rlc, but it is the Xlife project that is a disappointment, I still do not understand the concept of subscribing to a girl who only has cameras in her room or in apartments where we do not have access to the entirety of it, why no cameras in the bathrooms of Dayana or Aria and Leo? it is incomprehensible and for my part it does not even make me want to activate the two choices offered via my RLC subscription

in addition I find the interface of Xlife less good than that of RLC

There is also an infrastructure problem, I guess. I'm not sure about all the apartments but in Chloe's the cameras are on tripods not fixed on the wall. My guess is that is the same thing in the other apartments.