coolcucumber Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I remember when Gina and Curly started getting close, their first sex was also off cam area outside the kitchen door and you could hear Gina moaning and getting fucked quite clearly and till now we didn't get the cam there. Buki fucked either Neytiri or Nani in the bathroom in FR, that was off cam as well. Buki denied but we all have ears and could tell what was going on. Now i wasn't able to watch or hear the Kaya moaning but she could just be getting fingered and all, guess we will never know. But she did it off cam anyway and i hate that. Don't be on RLC and waste people's money if you are gonna do that, go to a hotel and fuck all you can, we won't be saying things then. 2 Quote
biglou1985 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, Pete1960 said: You should get a membership to the AWL or RSPCA I do 2 Quote
Pete1960 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, coolcucumber said: Well if Aya is leaving at the end of this month then it could make some sense but hasn't she stayed more than 3 months usual contract already ? I have to check when she and Brandon joined the project. Since 23/08/2025 So just over 4 months 1 Quote
Brit Guy Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, chogdad said: B4 UM. Probably all bating now or shagging 😆😆😆 1 Quote
Alladino Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Brit Guy said: Participants/Guests can do as they wish and of course RLC would not survive without sexual content (but from ALL residencies and not some) and you must be ignorant yourself to think there are people out there that do think RLC will survive without sexual content. My point is do some need to go on and on regarding tenants not being on cam, not doing this, not doing that. We know what they do and we know what they don't do and we don't need to be reminded just because some on CC are unhappy AGAIN. Then there's those here that live in hope participants/guests will kiss and have a play together even though it's a just a party where people join together in having social fun and not sexual fun. Does it really matter if they don't want to do something that's NOT actually in the RLC guidebook if even there is one. Key words in the title of the web site is 'real and life' which means the participants/guests do whatever suits them on or of cam, nudity or no nudity, sex or no sex, covered or uncovered ...that's what you call 'real and life'. What's not real is when people here question why participants shower or bath in bikini's, why they disappear off cam, why they participate in sexual activity covered up ...well here a few reminders ...there are camera's, they have the freedom and RIGHT to do as they wish and that's a couple of reasons why viewers don't get to see what they 'think' they are paying for when all we are paying for is access to the apartments via recording equipment. What goes on or what doesn't go on is their business and not ours. It's really simple and if you don't like something then why comment repeatedly on what you don't like whilst repeat events happen on cam only for you to say the same thing again. Participants have complete freedom to live how they want on cam in the same way 2 employees do in a place of work with one doing better than the other ...it happens and is a part of life. The world can be quite simple. If you're camera-shy, like me, for example, you don't go into an apartment full of cameras that broadcast live on the internet. But if on the other hanb you decide to live in an apartment that announced on there site head 'The private lives of other people...', have usually at least three cameras pointed at each bed, then it's pretty obvious what the point is. The girls can't be so naive as to misunderstand this and fail to recognize what the majority of viewers will reasonably expect. Therefore, When a girl hides her sex life from the camera, it's only natural that people are disappointed and express negative opinions about it. That's what happens, when a freeloader is called out for what they are. And I'm certainly not going to celebrate this as some kind of freedom initiative. If the girls don't want to participate, they should be honest about it and leave the project. I wouldn't mind that, and I can completely understand that there are people, like me, who don't want to be sexually active in front of a camera, even for money. Not to mention that no one would pay for it if I did change my mind about it. ;) I think the problem lies with RLC, because we don't pay the girls, we pay RLC. If they have many vacant rooms and some of the girls are obviously not really participating in the project, then this obviously reflects negatively on them. And that's also something we can talk about here. But that shouldn't distract from the fact that some girls obviously know exactly what is expected of them and want to trick the system by enjoying the advantages but avoiding the disadvantages. Just as the girls have the freedom to decide what they do (or, unfortunately, don't do), it is our freedom to write about it and be disappointed. 2 Quote
thereala78 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, coolcucumber said: I really hate those people who talk ill about someone behind their back, like be a grown up and if you have some problem with someone, talk face to face. What Neytiri did is so trash. If Kaya has some dignity, she should start ignoring Neytiri and her friends circle from now. Just go to B4 for Liora and have a good time. We know now that Kaya has some really good friends and are comfortable infront of cams, she should invite them once a week and enjoy herself rather than getting back to Neytiri again. Really disappointed to ready you 😞 Neyt already talked a lot face to face to Kaya 😉 some discussions were even transcripted here 😉 You were there in the car, as all we were of course and you heard and understood exactly what was said... There is no doubt, Neyt, and Neyt only, deliberately said awful things about Kaya for no reason? She was not the only girl in the car, she was Kaya's friend, unlike other girl(s) there... why would she be the only bad girl to blame? I don't know what was said, again, but maybe things were said about Kaya in front of the ex-BF or even at his request... girls should have lied and don't say the truth (or what they think to be the truth)? Maybe the guy was questionning about Kaya behavior in the project and they just answered... again IDK... but no one knows except the occupants of the car... But what I find harsh is your eagerness to condemn Neyt as if she was solely responsible for this mess... just because the forum decided she's guilty... I think everyone is partly responsible, including Kaya; we don't know the whole history. How do you know guys and girls yesterday are really good firends? Maybe she just met them last week you don't know... 2 Quote
thereala78 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 19 minutes ago, chogdad said: B4 UM. As I said earlier, it seems there was a water leak with the jacuzzi toilet or whatever is there... Nani put a towel and a basin Quote
chogdad Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 minutes ago, thereala78 said: As I said earlier, it seems there was a water leak with the jacuzzi toilet or whatever is there... Nani put a towel and a basin Oh i didn't read that, thanks. Quote
Brit Guy Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago @Alladino You said 'don't go into an apartment full of cameras that broadcast live on the internet.' As I said ...participants have total freedom to do as they wish and it's evident that RLC does NOT ask them to do anything they don't wish to do and therefore is not a 'requirement' of the project despite your point about cameras being trained on all the beds (which may I add I have said this same thing before but this means very little). The question I would ask is why are all the 'couples' toilets hidden yet 'some' of the Barce apartments toilets are in full view with active mics ...surely this is incredibly invasive and yet people cry when participants don't bate or fuck on cam and have a bath in a bikini ...so what ...deal with that shit. Like you said we pay RLC and not the project members because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online and nobody has any power on the content created/provided in each apartment and if anyone doesn't like it ...sign out and do one ...simple really. Quote
Mauri Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Alladino said: Il mondo può essere piuttosto semplice. Se sei timido davanti alle telecamere, come me, ad esempio, non entri in un appartamento pieno di telecamere che trasmettono in diretta su internet. Ma se invece decidi di vivere in un appartamento che sul suo sito annuncia "La vita privata degli altri...", e che di solito ha almeno tre telecamere puntate su ogni letto, allora è abbastanza ovvio qual è il punto. Le ragazze non possono essere così ingenue da fraintendere e non riconoscere ciò che la maggior parte degli spettatori si aspetterebbe ragionevolmente. Pertanto, quando una ragazza nasconde la sua vita sessuale alla telecamera, è naturale che le persone ne siano deluse ed esprimano opinioni negative. Questo è ciò che accade quando una scroccona viene chiamata per quello che è. E non ho certo intenzione di celebrare questo come una sorta di iniziativa di libertà. Se le ragazze non vogliono partecipare, dovrebbero essere oneste al riguardo e abbandonare il progetto. Non mi dispiacerebbe, e capisco perfettamente che ci siano persone, come me, che non vogliono essere sessualmente attive davanti a una telecamera, nemmeno per soldi. Per non parlare del fatto che nessuno pagherebbe per questo se cambiassi idea. 😉 Penso che il problema risieda nell'RLC, perché non paghiamo le ragazze, paghiamo l'RLC. Se hanno molte stanze libere e alcune ragazze non partecipano attivamente al progetto, questo ovviamente si riflette negativamente su di loro. Ed è anche un argomento di cui possiamo parlare qui. Ma questo non dovrebbe distogliere l'attenzione dal fatto che alcune ragazze sanno chiaramente cosa ci si aspetta da loro e vogliono ingannare il sistema godendo dei vantaggi ma evitando gli svantaggi. Proprio come le ragazze hanno la libertà di decidere cosa fare (o, purtroppo, non fare), è nostra libertà scriverne e rimanerne deluse. Quello che non capisci e’ che “vita privata”, non vuol dire esplicitamente o obbligatoriamente “sesso”, le ragazze hanno firmato un contratto per vivere in un appartamento con delle telecamere, e devono fare esattamente quello che fanno normalmente in una casa, vita privata vuol dire tante cose, non rapporti sessuali. Quote
thereala78 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, chogdad said: Oh i didn't read that, thanks. But maybe it's not the reason... we never know 😁 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.