yadevol Posted December 29, 2015 Author Share Posted December 29, 2015 Did anyone else notice that Sonja called out to Natascha when she and Ivor were trying for round 2, but she had gone back to petra. I think a 3some there is a real possiblity for the future. Not tonight but may be tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sat11 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 i think as soon as vv able to get people in she will leave, she is there to keep voro running till then, she might do a little bit here and there to keep subscribers hooked and stop them leaving. she did that very well so far, she has given nothing and yet here we are great full for a bit of smile and sexy dress up we think she is the best thing that happened in vv . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1010 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Beancounter, I am a lawyer and though I am no expert about the topic, I know about non-compete clauses. You generally cannot force someone not to have sex, it is against public policy and right to privacy. However, you can prohibit someone from showing their videos and stills from being sold at the time they are under contract. There is no evidence that Nikky is benefiting financially directly from the sale of pics or videos from VV. VV makes the profits (our fees) and would prohibit the participants from making money from their stay in VV. And let's not forget, J & G had sex and they were doing porn shoots. As to Julia being her boss, i don't know if it is quite the right term to use. But Nikky is under an agency contract with Julia's agency as one of her models. I saw her listed (with her picture) on Julia's agency site as one of her models! So clearly, Julia would then be able to stop her from doing VV if she was allowed to do that under law. And btw, why is intercourse the one thing they can't do? Can they do blowjobs, eat out girls, be eaten out by girls, etc.? Why? Many porn clips specialize in just certain types of sex. Some just bj's, some anal, some lesbian, etc. I have seen them. Why would they be allowed to do that? We all saw Nikky blow Akira once, tonight she got eaten out by Petra. I saw some of her videos where she only did lesbian or only bj's. Beancounter, please don't take all this the wrong way. I really like you. I just know that you and others aren't lawyers, don't know law, so people speculate on it because we didn't yet see her do intercourse. It will happen anyway, believe me. She will have intercourse. If I wasn't an attorney, I would have thought the same things you and others have! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1010 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Yadevol, I agree with you but I think that the threesome will be the one we saw tonight. Sonia and Nikky are best buds, but I don't think they will want to fool around with each other and Sonia will not share Ivo with Nikky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1010 Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Just one more thing I want to say. No one would have thought way back that Petra would be ok with Sonia fucking her Ivo (remember long ago when Petra told Dizi that Ivo was hers?). Yet a threesome resulted and Petra was ok with it. Now, Nikky gets involved with her and her guy. I bet Petra will eventually let her fuck him. You know more than likely most of these couplings in VV are not real relationships anyway (except for Akira and Charlie and Ivo and Sonia), and if the project requires them to rearrange the couplings they do it. It doesn't always work, witness Christy and Messa and Nastya. Let's be honest, basically this is all an act or show. I accept that it is and can deal with so long as it is not too contrived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miscvoyeur Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 I go to the store and come back and Natasha is still in Tver? What is she doing there at 3 in the morning keeping everybody awake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kifinas Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Did anyone else notice that Sonja called out to Natascha when she and Ivor were trying for round 2, but she had gone back to petra. I think a 3some there is a real possiblity for the future. Not tonight but may be tomorrow. That's right yadevol. Natasa was in the living room when Sonia called her. After the call she left living room and went in Petra's room. I am saying that Natasa went to Petra becouse she did not want to go in Sonia's room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sat11 Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 she is cosy with ivo on the sofa, where is sonya ? it usually happens when she is not around. i see sonya now she is by the table her back to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1010 Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 I think she is staying there, I guess????? These people never sleep! You realize that Nikky is keeping Ivo and Sonia from their nightly 3 am fuck! Well, they already fucked twice tonight, they are like rabbits! Akira is like the forgotten man, almost like Messa was at the end of his tenure, but for different reasons. They are not freezing him out, he may be sick or just not wanting to be with Nikky (well we benefited from that decision tonight!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabbath1987 Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 I go to the store and come back and Natasha is still in Tver? What is she doing there at 3 in the morning keeping everybody awake. Maybe she stays at Tver that night because of the illness of Akira. She does not want to get ill too I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sat11 Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 time to say good night , good evening, and good morning to all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upndown Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Mr1010, Could you clarify something for me. Your post at 6.05 today says "I am a lawyer" Your post 46 minutes later says "I am not a lawyer" Please let me know which is true and why the contradiction took place so I can decide whether to sue (or not). :scratchchin: :haha: :haha: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts