alanohio Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 1 minute ago, MrBox said: Ther is no sence in remark posible improvement for RLC with thing that work just fine. Maybe because the residents do not hide when they eat lunch or while they tie there shoes. They normaly only hide there sex and nudity (now only Rita). That is a good reason, or not? BTW, I would also like to complain about apartments without any guests. But this is normal for some people so it is not a good point to bring to discussion. Hiding is much more obvious and substantial. That was my original point. The complaints are all about sex, and different people handle sex in different ways. Some are open, some are not. THAT, is what is defined as "real life". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericjeanjean Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 23 minutes ago, kitek said: She called D saying she feels better and he is taking her out as usual. Thanks Kitek. Do you have any idea what was wrong with her? Poor kamila looked like she was in a lot of pain last night. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBox Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 8 minutes ago, alanohio said: That was my original point. The complaints are all about sex, and different people handle sex in different ways. Some are open, some are not. THAT, is what is defined as "real life". The residents need to neglecting the camera*. If they would not do this, they would not have a "Real Live" there. ... It is not like with the cam pages (e.g. chaturbate) out there. The do not need to give a show. ... The idea is to have a real life just as without cameras. :) *) I know that this needs overcoming, but without it, RLC would be not possible at all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noldus Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 thanks for dance demonstration Kami :-) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericjeanjean Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 21 minutes ago, Noldus said: Anyone who have heard something about Kristy today? Is she with her mother or still together with bf? All I know is that she, I guess just because she is Kristy, taught dogs how to skateboard. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanohio Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 Just now, MrBox said: The residents need to neglecting the camera*. If they would not do this, they would not have a "Real Live" there. ... It is not like with the cam pages out there. The do not need to give a show. ... The idea is to have a real life just as without cameras. :) *) I know that this needs overcoming, but without it, RLC would be not possible at all. I think the issue is this... People that watch RLC and/or subscribe, have an "expectation". They may call it "real life" and some of that might actually be interesting (parties, visitors, etc.) but what many(most?) want to see is skin and sex. RLC;s hope is pretty much the same. "Real Life" including parties, visitors, arguments, making up, watching TV, eating, and hopefully a lot of sex and skin. I'm sure that's what they tell the people applying. I'm sure that's what they are paying them for. However, the "plan" isn't always what we get because the people that live in these apartments are all different. Case in point #1; Nina and Kira move in and live their life pretty much they way they would live it if there weren't any cameras. It's a what you see is what you get couple. Case in point #2; K&K are both "fairly" open, but they have a lot of friends and business contacts they likely know where they live. Because of that, they are careful how much to show not to endanger those relationships. Case in point #3; Nelly and Bogden; pretty much sex anytime and anywhere. The cameras don't bother them a bit. Case in point #4; Dasha and Demid; This couple is pretty much controlled by Demid. He simply doesn't want Dasha or himself naked on the internet. Who knows why. If he and Dasha actually are part owners of the project, maybe that explains it. Case in point #5; Vika and BF; Vika came into RLC pretty open. After a couple shy days, she was showing herself regularly. Then her BF shows up and she starts closing down. In this case, her environment changed and so did she. My point here is that even RLC can't be sure how people will react when they get in front of the cameras, nor can they control what variables change that may change their reactions. At any given time, they will have some apartments working as planned and some not so much. THIS is what I call "real life". Constant change - constant flux. Expecting it to be 100% open sex is unrealistic. That's not REAL. I will agree that right now, RLC is dealing with a lot of apartments that aren't working - more than usual. Between variable that are holding people back from being open, people who never were open or who never will be again, and just bad luck, things aren't too fun right now. But it will also take some time to right the ship - IF - they actually realize things are not as good as they should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurfy08 Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 13 minutes ago, alanohio said: YET, the complaints are ONLY about sex, and hiding from sex, and not showing skin. But we have or had this in most (if not all) apartments though ? I agree, often in some...very rare on some others... Showing skin ? People keep complaining about Barcelona's apartment but there is far more skin there than what we can expect (in average) in real life. Do you seriously think that most girls would always be half naked most of the time ? People complain simply because these girls don't fulfill their fantasies. It it was only real life we might only be able to see them naked in their bedroom or when they take a shower... They don't have sex...what do you expect ? Nothing surprising...it's not because you put 3 or 4 girls (often far from their bfs ) in the same apartment that some things will happen between some of them. It's only common in porn.... ! It could happen...but the chance is very low. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noldus Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 2350: Kami went out to see coceboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitek Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 30 minutes ago, ericjeanjean said: All I know is that she, I guess just because she is Kristy, taught dogs how to skateboard. Kami said to D that Kristy is at her parents place. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noldus Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 3 minutes ago, kitek said: Kami sa til D at Kristy er på hennes foreldre sted. thank you Kitek, for this and for the 7.5 translation :-) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBox Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 10 minutes ago, alanohio said: I think the issue is this... People that watch RLC and/or subscribe, have an "expectation". They may call it "real life" and some of that might actually be interesting (parties, visitors, etc.) but what many(most?) want to see is skin and sex. RLC;s hope is pretty much the same. "Real Life" including parties, visitors, arguments, making up, watching TV, eating, and hopefully a lot of sex and skin. I'm sure that's what they tell the people applying. I'm sure that's what they are paying them for. However, the "plan" isn't always what we get because the people that live in these apartments are all different. Case in point #1; Nina and Kira move in and live their life pretty much they way they would live it if there weren't any cameras. It's a what you see is what you get couple. Case in point #2; K&K are both "fairly" open, but they have a lot of friends and business contacts they likely know where they live. Because of that, they are careful how much to show not to endanger those relationships. Case in point #3; Nelly and Bogden; pretty much sex anytime and anywhere. The cameras don't bother them a bit. Case in point #4; Dasha and Demid; This couple is pretty much controlled by Demid. He simply doesn't want Dasha or himself naked on the internet. Who knows why. If he and Dasha actually are part owners of the project, maybe that explains it. Case in point #5; Vika and BF; Vika came into RLC pretty open. After a couple shy days, she was showing herself regularly. Then her BF shows up and she starts closing down. In this case, her environment changed and so did she. My point here is that even RLC can't be sure how people will react when they get in front of the cameras, nor can they control what variables change that may change their reactions. At any given time, they will have some apartments working as planned and some not so much. THIS is what I call "real life". Constant change - constant flux. Expecting it to be 100% open sex is unrealistic. That's not REAL. I will agree that right now, RLC is dealing with a lot of apartments that aren't working - more than usual. Between variable that are holding people back from being open, people who never were open or who never will be again, and just bad luck, things aren't too fun right now. But it will also take some time to right the ship - IF - they actually realize things are not as good as they should be. If the residents do not agree with the project, they are free to go at any time. ... If they do not recognize it independently, i expect RLC to have contracts that need to be renewed regularly (maybe every half year) and allow an end of presence (like for couples as D&D; maybe even something like a trial period for new couples). ... The whole concept is based on some kind of agreement between the residents and RLC (that we do not know, unfortunately). There are no apartments for free in the world and there are certainly no free apartments by RLC. The important thing is that hiding is not nice to be seen on RLC, even with girls cute like hell or couples that are there for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarleyFatboy Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 Look....I didn't mean to stir up a bunch of crap over what I posted. I was only speaking for myself and no one else. It is perfectly ok if several or hell....even most of you do not agree with me and that is your prerogative. RLC has all the control of what they will allow and what the won't allow. K&K is a perfect example of this! There apparently was enough people sending them emails and expressing their desire to have them back and POOOF.....they are back and I'm sure the contract negotiations were such that they (K&K) don't have to show anything unless they choose to and RLC agreed due to popular demand. Just don't kid yourself for one second in thinking that RLC doesn't have any control over the tenants of these apartments! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.e335e3b234713d678b8911e6eec69d7b.gif)
Recommended Posts