Jump to content

There are sites like reallifecam


marcolino1988
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sorry but those sites aren't like RLC at all!!! I consider those as "porn sites". RLC isn't a "Porn Site, imo.

Same here. The great thing about this is that you see (relatively) normal people doing their thing when they want it. Sometimes sex, sometimes not.

All those other sites are sites where people are giving cam shows for money. Pay enough and you might see more. Nah, not my thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest NL Forever

Just curious - if RLC is not a porn site then why does it charge for people to see the sexual activity and nudity (which mainly happens in the locked rooms) and why does underwear seem to be the standard attire around the apartments for all couples, if not to keep the viewers intrigued?

And why are these the only reviews shown on the RLC website itself?

Reviews About Us

The concept of live 24/7 house cams is just fine and they've done a decent job with the set-up in terms of the cam quality and site navigation.

2012-07-31, TheBestPorn.com

RealLifeCam.com is a sweet addiction that truly lives up to it’s name. The site is as much a social experiment as it is a splendid implementation of a Voyeur House.

2012-07-15, WebcamSexAdvice.com

Also, if RLC is not a porn site and CC is meant to be a forum for RLC then why is most of the CC content connected to sex/nudity......?

And, finally, why are the adverts on here not about cleaning products, or bread making apparatus, or flea treatment  ;D ?  After all, CC is meant to reflect RLC is it not (that's not a criticism of Admin BTW)

Just a few questions for fellow members to ponder.....playing devil's advocate maybe.....but I do wonder how many of us are actually here to discuss the occupants' general lives....and I am as guilty as the rest I suppose....

If RLC was truly a social experiment then it would have decent, wholesome sponsorship (McDonalds or Disney, perhaps  ;D ) and it would not be charging to see the "naughty bits"....IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying people don't want to see the naked/sex stuff. Sex sells of course. But in my opinion RLC is a bit more then that. While sex is an important part of it I don't think its the focus and that's where the difference lies.

Its a bit like a relationship. Is sex the most important thing? Nope. Is sex one of the best things? Yep. Would you like one without sex? Hell No! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It RLC doesn't charge to see sex, it only charges for us for bathroom and bedroom access. If it charged for sex, they would censor the couples when they have sex in the living room for all free users.

The reason why they are advertised on sites like thebestporn.com and webcamsexadvice.com is because sex is involved with the couples. I mean, where would you think a site like RLC should be advertised.

The reason why content on CC is mostly sex stuff is because that's what we're for the most part interested. That doesn't mean the actual site is purely a porn site. If it were, they're would be porn actress fucking every night instead of couples who fuck when normal couples fuck. We as voyeurs like watching real people have sex, but we also like the other aspects of people watching: analyzing the couples and that sort of thing. Would you consider something like Big Brother purely pornographic?

RLC can just as easy bring in a couple that doesn't have sex at all. It's not about sex, it's about the couples that just happen to have sex. They are not a porn site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest NL Forever

I'm not saying people don't want to see the naked/sex stuff. Sex sells of course. But in my opinion RLC is a bit more then that. While sex is an important part of it I don't think its the focus and that's where the difference lies.

Its a bit like a relationship. Is sex the most important thing? Nope. Is sex one of the best things? Yep. Would you like one without sex? Hell No! :P

Good answer!  ;D    although I still think they could get a good sponsorship deal with "Hello Kitty" or "Pets At Home" or something similar and make the site free....in the interests of social education of course.......  ;) 

or just keep one room out of bounds as a "safe" room for the couples in case it was really needed (though couples signing up to the project would have to agree only to use it sparingly, otherwise why would they be willing to share their lives)

.....I think that people like myself (although it is hard to believe it) who were initially drawn to RLC because of the "Big Brother/Fly on the Wall" nature of it (and actually not the sex) would appreciate more rooms being open to general access, so that we can follow what goes on better - more continuity to the narrative.

And some English speaking couples would help as well!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest NL Forever

If the couples starting having sex only in the free rooms I think RLC would step in and do something.

TV shows like BB can get sponsorship deals so a "unique" site like RLC should be able to get something, surely there is a company out there who would contribute to a valuable social experiment? If they want to be seen as a non-porn site then they need to make more effort to sell themselves and project their image.

I think RLC have actually brought in couples who will provide good sexual entertainment and who are sexual exhibitionists - Isabella for example and Leora to a certain extent. They are certainly playing to the cameras - even the beloved Nora...  if RLC was populated with a bunch of docile, inarticulate, sexually inactive mingers then their sales would go down pretty rapidly. So in that sense I don't really accept that it is not a site based upon selling sex in some way or another (but it could change itself for the better....)

No I wouldn't consider BB pornographic - although it is very exploitative - and it is a game show after all so the situations are manufactured to provide the best entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...