letsdothis

Since you answered my question to Hector, I take it you didn't like my, "wall of text". What 's the matter, Hidden, you don't like to read? That's how you learn stuff. I'm just yanking your chain. Don't turn the dogs loose on me. Thanks a lot for the translation. Much appreciated.

Thank you. This is wonderful! More like this would be great, please...from anyone.

I posted this earlier, but it just vanished. Thank you, Hector. BTW, what does "TL;DR", mean?

Comments from a few pages back, got me thinking and this is the result. This is not directed at anyone in particular and it's not an accusation hurled at anyone, at all. I'm just saying. So, please keep your hate mail to yourselves. Having a high IQ doesn't necessarily make you an intelligent person. It could mean you just have a higher propensity at learning how to be an idiot, or maybe even a bigger idiot, little by little. Intelligence, or smartness, if you like, comes not from a number, but from living, and gaining life experience along the way. Hopefully, you can turn some of that experience into knowledge. And, if you're truly lucky, you learn how to change that knowledge and experience into wisdom. That's when you no longer have a need or desire to brag about how smart you are or how high your IQ is. Take Einstein, for example. He had an IQ of only 160, but he was predisposed to using his knowledge and experience to become a very wise man, helping people the world over, in many ways. I say, "only 160," because there have been many people since, who have, or had, much higher IQs than Einstein's. Some so high they couldn't be measured (around 300, or so). They were off the charts, literally. Does that higher number give them the proclivity to become wiser people, or just bigger idiots? I would say 'yes' on both counts, but I'm certainly not the one to judge. On the other side of that Einstein coin, take a look at Trump. I don't know his IQ. He would probably say it's very high, and maybe it is. But, after the kakistocracy he's created, I think most of the country would rather he not be President, IMO. He hasn't used his experience and knowledge to become a very wise person, IMO.

She's such a tiny, little thing. That's a perfect nickname for her, Mouse.

This is pure speculation, because I don't speak Russian. He may have wanted to try anal, but she is reluctant to have anal sex, or downright against it. Remember, she got angry with him once before for trying. But, he's going about it the wrong way for first time anal, or even second or third. You have to take it slow and easy, using fingers first and LOTS of lube. To just slam it in her ass is not only painful, it's also thoughtless. Bogdan, are you reading this? But, Groomy speaks Russion. I don't know if he follows this thread, but you could PM him the video and ask if he might translate for us.

That's why there's that big, toothy grin at the end of my post.

I'm reading this thread from the beginning, and I just got to this post. (So call me late to the party.) Ash, I just had to say, I will happily and fervently accept that challenge, grading to follow. As long as Guy doesn't kill me.

Thanks Amy and Ash for the likes.

Just give me Layla and Gina and I would die a happy man.

Cute.

I like it. You busy little bee.

Good answer. Thanks a lot.

From the minute I saw her, I have loved Layla's face. For a long time, I couldn't figure out what it was -- I mean aside from the fact that she's just drop-dead gorgeous, IMHO, plus all her other scrumptious assets, (sorry ladies, what can I say, I'm a guy), Then, today, I saw a picture and I finally realized why I simply adore Layla's beautiful face. She reminds me of Reese Witherspoon.

And the guy just yawns.

How about someone posting Belle's "...beautiful pussy views," please? I didn't get to see much of her (pun intended), this time around. Thank you.

Thanks, Phantom.

Could someone tell me, please, who's doing the munching, who's being munched and who's in the foreground with her pretty ass to the camera? Thanks.

And you do them very well. Thank you.

Harley, I agree that sometimes, RLC's poor cameras are the reason for the poor quality, but I did say that, in this case, I didn't believe RLC's cameras were to blame. As I said, I believe the poor quality of the pictures in question, was caused by excessive zooming in on the original vidcaps or pictures. Some people, but thankfully not all, do this to get closer to the subject, but it can cause blurry and grainy looking pictures. I believe that is what happened in this case. You can see these are not the originals by how close to the subject we are and by what is not in the pictures.

Harley, I don't think, in this case, we can blame RLC for the poor quality. Think about it. Everyone uses the same cameras to record their pictures and videos and we've seen much better quality pictures posted from these cameras. In this case, I believe the blurry, grainy quality is the result of excessive zooming in. Nothing personal, hiddenwood, lots of people do it.

Gotcha. Wish I could watch. RLC has been blocking my IP for months, now.

Dragon, you might like pages 10, 11, 13 & 14. She's not completely naked, but, still... I only went back as far as page 10, but it seems to me she's been totally naked before.

I don't know how you know that, but a HUGE THANK YOU to you, sir!! So, if I ever see a completely naked twin, lying on her stomach, on the corner of the bed, with her W I D E open legs pointed directly at the camera, that would be Lia?