-
Posts
14,911 -
Joined
-
Points
9,515 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by Thestarider
-
For you Love we sure can
-
I agree Noldus, But ANNA has already been there twice :)
-
Here are the notes, you decide Notes Your payment details are processed by high-security systems at SegPay, our trusted third-party payment processor. All token purchases are one-time charges, which means you will never be charged again for the same purchase. Tokens can be spent to gain access to RLC Replay (last 24 hours of every cam recording to watch). If your Premium membership expires before you spend all your tokens, they will be kept under your account. If you signup for Premium membership again using the same email address later, the tokens will reappear your balance. If your Premium membership expires before you spend all your tokens, you can also convert the tokens you have left into Premium membership at the rate of 20 tokens = 1 day of Premium.
-
Once you buy 200 tokens and you will have ten days of replay, so once you start to use it you will have ten days consectutive of replay if you chose to use it or not, the days will be counting, you guys should learn that if they can get your money they will.
-
Will any of the one timers return for a second time like so many have ? Vote for the one you wish to return ASAP
-
What is next, They will be selling tokens to camshow girls they are casting now, and calling them girls next door, so much for Real Life Cam should be called Real Cam Life
-
Yes but I am sure it is a use it or lose it policy that they don't tell you about, So if you pay for ten days after ten days you have lost those tokens whether you use the feature or not.
-
Completely agree with Sulzer, the premium membership is about the highest of all kinds of pay for pleasure websites, and now they want you to pay more for something they should have been providing all along to premium members. HOOK, LINE, AND SINK YOUR CARD in RLC coffers.SO if you subscribe for 90 days and want the replay fucntion for 90 days they get you for 200 bucks. That is just plain rediculous.
-
New girl Heidi
Thestarider replied to Noldus's topic in Kristy, Maracuya, Alana, Rosalie - (02/03/16 - 06/19/19)
I would guess that this is just temporary as this Hedi has come and gone in the K&K penthouse many times over the last year, could be just an extended visit of a month or two. -
So I guess you beleive that we never landed on the moon either, that it was just a conspiracy theory? or can we agree that NASA is based on science ? Or can we all agree that at MIT are some most cutting edge scientist in the world today ? Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede. The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent. Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as “proof” of a global warming crisis.) NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers. The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice. According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008. Are The Polar Ice Caps Melting? New NASA Study Shows Mass Gains Are Bigger Than The Losses Global warming has been blamed on many different natural causes. Around 1,000 A.D. until 1950 A.D. there were very large temperature deviations. This has partly been explained by volcanic eruptions and changes in the sun. Around these times, people did not have the technology to impact the Earth in that way. There have been warming periods early in the Earth’s history without human influence. Dr. Krabill, who is the project scientist at NASA’s Wallaps Flight Facility, was part of the team that discovered the thinning of Greenland. During 1993 and 1994, Krabill’s team took a survey of the altitude of the ice sheets surface on a portion of Greenland using an airborne laser. In 1998, they repeated their test. What they found was that the ice sheet lost 51 cubic kilometers. Another NASA funded study took place where they removed ice cores from glaciers. “These samples suggested that a natural accumulation of snowfall might be to blame,” said Dr. Mosley-Thompson, a research scientist for Byrd Polar Research Center at the Ohio State University. Some scientists are also blaming ocean currents. From 1990-1996, a flux of warm water into the North Atlantic as part of the North Atlantic Oscillation may hold some evidence. The earth could also be warming as a response to last glacial period around 10,000 years ago. Global cooling was also a big deal from the 1940’s to the late 1970’s. Many tests have been performed to try to prove theories about global warming. Scientists cannot perform experiments on the earth’s atmosphere. They conduct these experiments in small models under controlled conditions. They change the conditions to see how things react. They also run computer simulations of global climate, although it is impossible to create a perfect model of our climate. “The system is too complex, even the most complex climate model doesn’t get it right”, said Mosley-Thompson. Is Global Warming Part of Earth's Natural Cycle: MIT Team Says "Yes" -A Galaxy Insight One thing does seem very clear, however; science is only beginning to get a focus on the big picture of global warming. Findings like these tell us it's too early to know for sure if man's impact is affecting things at "alarming rates." We may simply be going through another natural cycle of warmer and colder times - one that's been observed through a scientific analysis of the Earth to be naturally occurring for hundreds of thousands of years. Solar Cycles & Climate Change Solar Cycles Cause Global Climate Change, not Humans Latest science reveals that sharp increases in global warming "precede" sharp increases in CO2—not the other way around. Global warming causes more CO2 to be released from the oceans. Current research also shows that Earth's oceans are now beginning to cool. It is also now clear that temperatures over the last century correlate far better with cycles in oceans than they do with carbon dioxide; and, the temperature cycles in oceans are caused by Solar and Lunar cycles. Beyond that, planetary cycles drive the solar cycle, particularly the cycles of Jupiter and Saturn. Yet the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) advocates, as well as the media, continue to ignore all of this, perpetuating fear and advocating spending billions of dollars on non-solutions for global warming, something that is not even occurring. Although humans contribute to greenhouse gases, the overall effect is a tiny fraction compared to natural causes. To say humans are the cause of global warming; and to also make predictions that global warming is occurring and will continue to increase is simply inaccurate. This is not to ignore the silver lining of the global warming scare, as humanity must certainly learn to respectfully participate in harmony with nature, with the breath of the Earth, with her land and oceans; and with the cycles of the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars. So let us act and change from knowledge about what is really going on rather than from misinformation fueled by politicians and big-business driving the media and contributing to mass-hysteria. The "Solar Grand Maximum" has ended - a fact of science most often not considered by the advocates who profess that Global Warming is caused by man-made CO2.
-
Voyeur-House.TV - Part 1
Thestarider replied to StnCld316's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
-
Voyeur-House.TV - Part 1
Thestarider replied to StnCld316's topic in VHTV - General Discussion (11/01/16)
Well its a good thing it's not Friday the 13th or it would be even worse or a full moon -
WELCOME BACK DANAYA!!
Thestarider replied to Noldus's topic in B#4 Sara, Karma, Katarina, Vesna (11/11/15)
APHRODITE is back in all her glory number 2 all time on CC has returned -
Yes several times actually over the years