All due respect Foamy, I specifically went back to reread rule 5, and I just don't see which part of it I violated. People that have been here as long as I know exactly what I meant and I didn't think it needed further explanation. On the other hand, the very same rule outlines something that you continuously decide to overlook
(FOAMY, here. I removed that comment because it contained an objectively perceived insult to another member. I attempted to do that with every comment made by everybody here just to stop any more bombs from exploding. I also applied "Likes" your posts (and others) who saw things were going off the rails.
Direct insults yield to a quick objective judgement. Whether someone is just an annoyance and should be banned is a subjective judgement, and cannot be performed without deliberation and due process. It's a hassle, it takes longer, and would not quell the disturbance.
In other words, I have been putting out fires all morning. Charges of arson can be investigated later. But I'd just as soon consider the whole matter as "water under the bridge" and move on. Thank you for understanding the position I'm in.)