Epikouros

Indeed, some girls just like to be "body free", without (or maybe with few 😉 ) ulterior motives... I love that kind of girls. Edit: and, like Thinga said, maybe it's why Kaya & Neytiri get along so well...

I said it before in reply to Biglou, but I'd love it if a pretty young girl walked up to me like that, even without any other intentions... 🙂 Edit: also, I'm sure you'll see the ironic humour of your post on a voyeur forum, of all places! 😛 (disclaimer: I hope you don't feel insulted: I appreciated your humour with your "ChatGPT" summary of my post in the Elli forum - I wish actual ChatGPT could be like that when prompted -, so I reckoned you could take this little jab!) 😉

Why is it important to you if they clean or not? They're not in in your house, after all... And the place gets cleaned by staff now & then anyway, or by tenants when they feel like it. Or maybe, you have a "cleaning maid" fantasy?... 😉 😄 Nothing wrong with that! 🙂

I would prefer it if girls wore less clothes where I visit! And I actually feel flattered if they do, not disrespected! I feel more disrespected if they quickly cover up in these situations, as if I were some kind of potential rapist or something... 😉 Look at it this way: Kaya just isn't very prudish; perhaps the guy already saw her topless (or nude) on the beach or in a spa anyway (also, nudity mores are more loose in (most of) Europe than in (most of) the US, and certainly in places like Barcelona!). It can also be seen as kind of compliment: if you see a girl (semi-)nude, and she doesn't panic or shy away because of it (and also isn't coming on to you or trying to seduce you), it means she feels safe & at ease with you there: she knows or trusts you aren't going to try anything weird with her. That's the atmosphere in the mixed spa that I frequent, and on the better nude/topless beaches. She feels "at home" (and at the moment, B7 is her home). Same reason that straight girls are generally fine with being seen naked by lesbian/bi girls: they still feel safe, despite those girls' sexual preference: it's fine being seen (half)naked, as long as they feel safe. Edit: It's fine, I see that you changed your mind after reading further. I'm just catching up with B7, so hadn't got there yet, lol. 😄

🤣

Concerning Lia & Mia: I think I remember that when I was a subscriber for the first time (or maybe I was still only watching free cams?), Lia & Mia had their last stay at RLC. I don't even remember which villa or apartment, but it was Barcelona. I remember them as a bit boring, but not hiding too much from showing nudity on cam, and rather good looking, if a bit thin (but girls like Dana & others were/are thinner, yet less impopular). I remember also that CC posters were rather critical of them, finding them very boring (I'm not sure I posted yet in those days, but I read CC now & then). I attributed it to the fact that perhaps they'd been tenants rather often during the previous years, and people were just tired of seeing them?... Or because they never bated or had sex on cam? (I don't even remember if they did or not... It's also not the most important thing for me... But pretty sure they didn't hide or cover up to bathe or shower...) So, yes, I thought they were a bit boring too, but not any more boring than a lot of other tenants back then, or since... So, my question is: why were they (& are they still) that impopular?... I mean, we've had some worse & less good looking tenants since, didn't we?... Edit: I kind of have the same thoughts about Rachel: not my all time favourite, but also not really getting her impopularity... Though I never watched her all that often; maybe that's already telling something...

Neither is, as they are not new, I think?... Isn't it only new girls (I mean first timers) that get a (new) number? So... Still waiting for #300... Edit: but I would also vote for Zara, in case I'm incorrect! 😁 Edit 2: As was to be expected, Noldus long since beat me to it! 🙂

... to identical twin brothers?... (or, who knows, the same guy?)

Perhaps we first need another fight for that to happen... Whether it will be to B4 or the curb, then, remains to be seen... Too bad. Looks-wise, I like both Jen & Vira...

That's too funny, lol!... 🤣 Was that you, or actually ChatGPT? If the latter: which prompt did you use?

Also not bad, but still different than the version I got. However, some nuance (and censored stuff as well) disappeared from both versions. To read the best version, you'll have to read my original, uncondensed post! 😁

This is what I got. Not bad actually, but it left out the more juicy/funny "bad language" details, as I supposed it would. Is it close to the version you got? Feel free to post it as well, if you want. : Condensed summary: The passage challenges the claim that women cheat more than men, arguing there is no credible evidence for it and that cheating rates are likely similar across genders. It reasons that alleged female infidelity must involve men who are also cheating, making the numbers roughly equal. Controlling a partner out of distrust undermines the value of a relationship, regardless of gender. It criticizes manosphere narratives as rooted in insecurity, repression, or nostalgia for outdated patriarchal norms. The text also notes that men appear more likely to seek casual or transactional sex, as reflected in the higher demand for female prostitution. Beyond relationships, it argues that humanity is not at risk of dying out, that having children is optional, and that delaying or avoiding parenthood can be valid. Finally, it claims humans are not naturally wired for lifelong sexual fidelity but are wired for jealousy, meaning monogamy relies largely on social and cultural constraints rather than instinct.

I know, I use ChatGPT as well sometimes (not for posting here, though). It's just that if I do it, I will get a different version than you did, as would anyone else. ChatGPT & other AI models very rarely or never give exactly the same (textual) output, even when using identical prompts. So I was just wondering what you got, and thought it might be of use to people who don't like to read more than a few paragraphs. I'm sure it left out the juicy/funny bits though, as it's unfortunately prone to censorship... 😉 Maybe I'll let ChatGPT have a go at summarizing my post, using your prompt above, and post it here. That way you'll notice how big or small the differences are.

Can you copy/paste ChatGPT's condensed version of my post here? I'm a bit curious, and it might help some people too.🙂 Thanks!

If you had any reading understanding, or had attempted to read my post at all, you'd have noticed that I'm just as much a "blue haired nose ring wearing feminist pig" as I'm a manosphere circlejerking wannabe macho 'real man': not at all. You're just namecalling because you're not able to counter my arguments. There was even one paragraph feminists would probably hate me for. But I don't think you got that far.😄 As with all fanatics: if you're not fully agreeing with them, you must be the other extreme. 4 short paragraphs. Was that short enough for you to understand?

I recognise that problem. At the moment (it's subject to change, as I now follow Elli a bit more since recently 😉 ), but usually mostly B1, B2, and mainly B4 & B7, sometimes R6. And even that is becoming too much. I usually read those forums without writing many posts myself, but when I do, I want to be "complete": I don't like small snippets of text going back & forth, hence when I do write a post, it tends to get a certain length... Or sometimes a striking oneliner! (not in my previous post though 😁) My posts may be longer, but their frequency is rather low I think. In total amount of words, spread out over many posts, I think my word count is rather low compared to many, even though they never string more than a few sentences together but post quite often (& usually saying basically the same thing every time)...

It seems I'm just one of the few people who can still read, write, structure & comprehend a piece of text longer than 3 paragraphs decently in the 21st century... 😉 Me and ddhm live on other sides of the European continent, but I usually do read what he writes! (fast) 🙂

I suppose (not) you can back this up with scientific data? Manosphere channels don't count. Stop sucking Andrew Tate's (likely small) dick, and get your head out of his ass. If women cheat much more than men, as you profess, I'm afraid you'll have to turn gay! Less chance to get cheated on! 😄 (in fact not, as men, gay or not, cheat just as much as women). Because why would you ever want to have a meaningful relation with any girl/woman if you can't trust her? What is your relationship worth if you have to control her (or him) all the time?... That whole manosphere thing is largely repressed homosexuality anyway imo, or for pubescent incel boys until they find that out, with a few embittered 20-70yo guys thrown in, who long for a pre-1960s patriarchal society they never lived in. Because who do you think all those cheating girls/women have sex with? For a large part with guys that are themselves cheating on their own girlfriends/wives of course, making the number of cheating women & men about equal! Even those bad boys that you speak of (and they surely exist), mostly have at least one 'official' girlfriend that they cheat on. Perhaps several, who don't even know of each other's existence, and who may be faithful to that guy themselves (or not, I hope for their sake). And why is the demand for female prostitution so much bigger than for male prostitution?... Maybe guys are just more inclined to do that "for free" than girls, generating a larger "supply"?... 😉 Also, the world needs less people in it in general. We're at 7 or 8 billion now. We're not dying out anytime soon. No one says you have to get kids (well, many religions do, but this is the 21st century, so screw that). One of the reasons people should wait having kids till after 30-35: maybe they'll never get around to having kids then, and that's not necessarily a bad thing, on the contrary! Moreover, and that's an argument feminists might hate me for, so don't just lump me onto their side: some nice female bodies get destroyed by pregnancy & childbirth; all the more reason to wait with having kids until the body starts deteriorating anyway, or not have kids at all... (in fact I'm too hedonistic to be either hardline feminist/woke or conservative/manosphere). Humans, male or female, are just not wired to be sexually faithful. Those that manage to remain so, do it because of cultural/societal/religious constraints, and have to repress a lot of urges. They are wired to be jealous though (again, both men & women!), hence all those fidelity rules humans struggle with & want to enforce at the same time.

In your Andrew Tate-inspired "real men" misogyny tirade, you're forgetting that this is something guys do just as well. Or weren't TOM DICK HARRY JAROME JAMAL & TYRONE capable of "Monkey Branching", too? Perhaps that's the reason they're not around anymore?... Or maybe it's less bad when "real men" do it?... 🙄 It seems monogamy is hard for both men & women. That's why I think both boys & girls should happily fuck around until they're 30-35. No fidelity & relationship bullshit, no jealousy. Problem is: that's just as hard as monogamy for many...

One could say the same about watching it...

Imagine if that became possible one day... People would be able to send each other "smelfies"!... 🤢 😄

Wait... Did FrankZabba (before: HarleyFatboy) make a third account?... 🙃

Nothing at all, good sir. 🙂 But you'll have to ask FZ/HFB, he's the one pretending not to be one!... 😁 PS: I think it was you who pointed out to him that he forgot to keep track of his fake age, wasn't it?

The boy looks way too young for that. FrankZabba / HarleyFatboy is a boomer in his sixties, though he claims to be only 43 (and before that, 42 for more than a year until someone pointed out that he forgot to adjust his fake age with time! 🤣 )