*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***
-
Posts
44,425 -
Joined
-
Days Won
30 -
Points
-61,430 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by Amy3
-
You’re right very few people would. But then again look at what RLC created and compare their numbers to VH. I’d say that there is an audience for real voyeurism. Well, none of it is real in that sense, but the idea that it’s what I said, an attempt to make it look as real as possible. So, when I say that VH chose greed over the soul of their site, this is what I mean. Rather then slowly building a legitimate voyeur site based on the idea of individual tenants connected to their wheel, they allowed managers to create Frankenstein.
-
The trick should be to pull off the appearance of real life as much as possible while at the same time putting on a good show. That the job description for a voyeur site cam worker. What we see now is straight up, preannounced, staged camstar porn shows by in large. Announcing guests and the promise of sex parties on Twitter defeats the idea of “the unexpected” and thus completely undercuts the notion of voyeurism. It removes all doubt that what you are seeing is in fact a cam show. VH tweets should only be the after view of what happend not the preview of events to come. Does this make any sense to any of you?
-
Exactly! They aren’t supposed to care about the viewers. That’s not voyeurism, that’s a performance. If you signed up to see real people live their real life on cam, why would you pay to see a performance?
-
This IS what VH was supposed to be about from the beginning. It wasn’t supposed to be the cam show, preannounced performances that it is now. It was supposed to be independent individuals connected to the VH axel. What messed it all up was the invention of the managers. Once that happened, apts were opened for friends and friends of friends. The rest is history! You may not like seeing how real people live, but that’s what voyeurism is and that’s what this site was supposed to be about. In my opinion each tenant should be independent and strike their own deal with VH. If Catherine and John have an outside means to make money and this is just extra money, I’d say they are doing it right and they should be applauded.
-
She swallows! I like her! ❤️
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes, indeed! She was simply gorgeous! ❤️
-
Yes, I wonder how things would be impacted here if an unrep cancelled a rep?
-
And it’s mostly all free! 🤑
-
The heart and soul of a business has to come first. When it becomes about making money first, all is lost.
-
You’re killing me! 🤣
-
And companies that put their greed before the quality of their product lose their soul and eventually their business follows behind it. Then there’s a lot of head scratching!
-
I’m not comparing, just pointing out VH’s priorities and motivations. #1 Money #2 Beat RLC #3 Voyeurism
-
VH thinks the answer is to churn through these couples so that your kind will get their fill. What happens after they leave and the constant stress of having to perform goes out the window with them. It’s just business they’ll say. VH knows who is making the money here.
-
But VH, they know what awaits them? VH knows very well what’s in store for them. A bump followed by diminishing returns then back to square one. It’s just a matter of time. I couldn’t do it. I’d have a heart and try to keep the idea of voyeurism alive and well. That would be my #1 focus, not the money or this incessant need to beat RLC.
-
Good man! ❤️
-
Here you go! Save yourself some money! 🤗 https://theporndude.com/top-amateur-porn-sites
-
Unexpected? VH tweeted this performance early today! The only thing left to wonder was where the cum would land. https://twitter.com/VoyeurHouseTV/status/972155742856929281?s=20
-
Well, they haven’t lived up to their own standards I think. Dean did move the foul line and a new precedent is in place.
