Amy3 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Yes, in so many ways this would be so much better if they did have a day job and a real life. This caged animal model of views for pay creates all of these problems. The tenants are just as focused on the cams as we are. Like you said, they have a vested interest in US. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip2020 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Dude! I'm not saying that she doesn't have to do anything. But saying that she has to progress into causal fucking all the time is missing the whole point of her life. What makes her interesting is that she appears to want love. The story here is about how she goes about finding it. The story isn't how many guys she can fuck or how many rounds she can fuck or if she's going to swing or not. It's about her a as a person who wants to find love. That's how I watch her. You're right Nina and Alan can fuck all day long and no one cares much cause it's boring. While Lisa may not be in the top tier for sex on cam, she is for having a compelling personality and what a appears to be a strong need for love. She's a different person then the rest and that what makes her valuable and watchable. You always complain about how we all seem to want porn sex all the time, well here is a girl that bunks that mold. I just don't want her to feel like she has to be like Misty in order to find an audience. She doesn't! If you want to watch endless loops of great sex between people you couldn't care less about, watch one of the many porn sites on the internet. The people we watch here on VH are real people, living their real lives on camera. The consistency of the tenants and the duration of their participation in VH, allows us to think differently about these people than we would watching porn actors. We get some insight into their daily lives, see their interactions with guests and therefore some of us actually care about their wellbeing (like me). Others do not. Each to their own. That's why VH has something for everybody. Don't judge! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic351 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 28 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Wow Nack, I don't think I've ever seen you this upset. Just so you know, it became a reality show the moment James started interacting with us here. Then, Layne, who is one of own own joined and another connection was made. Following that, many many more tentants learned of CC and began following our comments. Everyday we get one step closer and closer to each other. We now have to "be careful" what we say. I think this is just how VH is going to be. Always remember that this is views for pay. They have a great incentive to give us what we want and that is not anywhere close to a normal, "real" life. Also, I don't think tipping is out of the realm of possibilities either. Voyeurism has never been a good word for what we are doing. Maybe it should have been called Homie-House.tv. I respectfully disagree that this is not voyeurism. According to the Google Dictionary "Voyeurism" is defined as:" the practice of gaining sexual pleasure from watching others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity". Thus I submit that outside of being a "peeping tom" or paying to watch others engage in nudity or sexual acts in person; that this is voyeurism personified and exemplified. it is exactly the word for what we are doing. Query. How many do you think would pay to come here if SXGD were the only participants here? Subscribers and others come here to view sex and nudity and you can't tell me when Jeff and Violet start going at it there aren't more than a few deriving sexual pleasure from it. That some participants choose to interact with the subscribers here does not make it any less an act of voyeurism. Indeed, such personal interaction may heighten the sexual pleasure one gets from watching someone they feel they know get it on. Some participants may read CC from a business sense to see how we react to them. Misty is no doubt aware of how we feel about Ralph. Some participants may read CC because they like the feed back and they like to be liked. Misty, Bree, Jeff, Violet, and others are most likely aware they are well liked here and may even use that as a negotiating chip down the line. So while we may be "Homie TV" because of the interaction, to say this VH is not a voyeur site is in my eyes, completely off base. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 4 minutes ago, Amy3 said: Yes, in so many ways this would be so much better if they did have a day job and a real life. This caged animal model of views for pay creates all of these problems. The tenants are just as focused on the cams as we are. Like you said, they have a vested interest in US. also nobody needs to watch sex 24/7 (though it 's nice). they just need to make better use of the time so they can make some xtra $ and still lead as close to a normal life as possible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic351 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 1 minute ago, golfer06 said: also nobody needs to watch sex 24/7 (though it 's nice). they just need to make better use of the time so they can make some xtra $ and still lead as close to a normal life as possible. Ah, I need to watch sex 24/7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chip2020 said: If you want to watch endless loops of great sex between people you couldn't care less about, watch one of the many porn sites on the internet. The people we watch here on VH are real people, living their real lives on camera. That's the reason i can't understand (of course i know it's because $$$$) why there is 'casahot'... It doesn't fit here on a voyeur site in any possible form Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip2020 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, Sparkles said: That's the reason i can't understand (of course i know it's because $$$$) why there is 'casahot'... It doesn't fit here on a voyeur site in any possible form "Something for everybody", my friend! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golfer06 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 11 minutes ago, mic351 said: I respectfully disagree that this is not voyeurism. According to the Google Dictionary "Voyeurism" is defined as:" the practice of gaining sexual pleasure from watching others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity". Thus I submit that outside of being a "peeping tom" or paying to watch others engage in nudity or sexual acts in person; that this is voyeurism personified and exemplified. it is exactly the word for what we are doing. Query. How many do you think would pay to come here if SXGD were the only participants here? Subscribers and others come here to view sex and nudity and you can't tell me when Jeff and Violet start going at it there aren't more than a few deriving sexual pleasure from it. That some participants choose to interact with the subscribers here does not make it any less an act of voyeurism. Indeed, such personal interaction may heighten the sexual pleasure one gets from watching someone they feel they know get it on. Some participants may read CC from a business sense to see how we react to them. Misty is no doubt aware of how we feel about Ralph. Some participants may read CC because they like the feed back and they like to be liked. Misty, Bree, Jeff, Violet, and others are most likely aware they are well liked here and may even use that as a negotiating chip down the line. So while we may be "Homie TV" because of the interaction, to say this VH is not a voyeur site is in my eyes, completely off base. very well said. i said that you were 1 of the most intelligent people here & your statement proves it. (and i do want sex 24/7 also!) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 1 minute ago, Chip2020 said: "Something for everybody", my friend! So they need to change the name of the project.. Something for everybody on the voyeur premise.. and not on acting for cams/caming/having schedule to shows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic351 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 5 minutes ago, Sparkles said: So they need to change the name of the project.. Something for everybody on the voyeur premise.. and not on acting for cams/caming/having schedule to shows 22-years in the legal field taught me how to present an opposing view in a respectful manner.. (When I want to) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 Genrally speaking Included in the definition of voyeurism is the idea that it's without the targets knowledge. Nobody would say that someone watching porn is a voyeur because the porn stars are fully expecting to be watched. Yea, sure maybe on a technical level porn viewing is voyeurism, but that's not what being implied by these sites. The implication of the word voyeurism is clearly the idea that it's "without knowledge" or "in secret". That is clearly not the case here at all. I never can be. It's merely an illusion that we pretend to be the case, but as time goes on, even that is vanishing. We are all now acquaintances, thus the Homie-House.tv comment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted September 14, 2017 Share Posted September 14, 2017 I sense the "can we get back on topic" comments coming. I'll cut myself off. I've said my peace for now. Just speaking my mind as it pertains to Lisa and VH. I return you to your regularly scheduled programming. Please don't take anything I say too seriously, I really do love your all very much. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts