Jump to content

Jeka Nothings houses,good or bad?


 Share

Jk Nothings houses and residents,are they good or bad?  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. Nothings places are worth of VHTV or not?



Recommended Posts

Anyone that is VHTV client for some thing know what the..Nothings houses..are.Its houses that stay online few months and residents don't have sex,but they do plenty of teases(massages after massages etc).What you think about this places?Good or bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, golfer06 said:

they suck. i have no idea why these apts are on vh. fortunately vh has so many other apts that there is usually something more interesting somewhere (everywhere) else!

You know i agree with you,my fears is that start being more than in Nothings place at the same time in site,Just like jeka started with one cam girls ok and now dude have a lot of those...if the do nothing,teasing,no sex works then..he will open more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amy3 said:

All apts are worthy! I never call for the removal of any tenants unless they break the rules. VHTV is a cut throat money grab. As long as the tenant can justify to themselves that it's worth it for them to stay, then they should stay. 

With that said, I would in a heartbeat shitcan all of the managers and force every tenant to make their own deal directly with VH. VH should cover the costs of setting up the tenants if they can't afford it. None of this pyrimid bullshit with managers and sub-managers should be allowed! It breeds corruption!

Probraby one of the worst things in VH...the managers.If VH was more involved and place had just maybe three,four managers thing would be better.And remember VH iTs an porn site and open places were residents don't have sex...it's bullshit.Its kinda like if you watch an porn movie but..the film was no porn,sex...only crap massages stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amy3 said:

 None of this pyrimid bullshit with managers and sub-managers should be allowed! It breeds corruption!

Not only that it is ripping off the tenants as the 50% the apartment gets is then split 2 or 3 ways. If VH managed them the tennants would get the full 50% they should have which would possibly encourage them to stay and do more if they were earning a decent share.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

although it would certainly be wrong to prey on desperate for $ tenants there have been a few cases of the managers getting in on the action that have been quite memorable. of course george & serena was a little weird. but she did chase him. also the 1 year party at nina/alan apt would have been nothing without george. also he has not taken advantage of the polly/valery apt at all. the next example would be anna/alex at lexy/pete housewarming party. 1 of the hottest nights in vh history imo. also zack with juliet & selma saved that apt as nothing at all was happening there. as for the abuse the compound episode should be a lesson on why better oversight is needed.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, golfer06 said:

although it would certainly be wrong to prey on desperate for $ tenants there have been a few cases of the managers getting in on the action that have been quite memorable. of course george & serena was a little weird. but she did chase him. also the 1 year party at nina/alan apt would have been nothing without george. also he has not taken advantage of the polly/valery apt at all. the next example would be anna/alex at lexy/pete housewarming party. 1 of the hottest nights in vh history imo. also zack with juliet & selma saved that apt as nothing at all was happening there. as for the abuse the compound episode should be a lesson on why better oversight is needed.

Managers have a lot of fault of the state site is,but also the residents,bet all residents know VHTV it's an porn site but some arrive and don't have sex!?And Regard managers...there are MANAGERS..and...managers...the first ones open their houses and care for them,they make sure places are active..like George and an couple others..then we have the managers that open places and let them abandoned to the flies..no try to mantain them active..interesting..nothing..like jeka the worst manager in my opinion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ze81 said:

Managers have a lot of fault of the state site is,but also the residents,bet all residents know VHTV it's an porn site but some arrive and don't have sex!?And Regard managers...there are MANAGERS..and...managers...the first ones open their houses and care for them,they make sure places are active..like George and an couple others..then we have the managers that open places and let them abandoned to the flies..no try to mantain them active..interesting..nothing..like jeka the worst manager in my opinion.

true. but alex/lina are close. while they have had many good apts they have also had a lot of bad ones. and they don't seem to do anything to help the situation. it's "produce profit instantly" or out!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2018 at 8:40 PM, ze81 said:

Anyone that is VHTV client for some thing know what the..Nothings houses..are.Its houses that stay online few months and residents don't have sex,but they do plenty of teases(massages after massages etc).What you think about this places?Good or bad?

 i think  its the manger fault he chooses  who is not suitable to hvtv life, may be for low rate contract ,specially for Charlee & Liss  i think  he didn't tell them what is expected from them

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, x1000 said:

 i think  its the manger fault he chooses  who is not suitable to hvtv life, may be for low rate contract ,specially for Charlee & Liss  i think  he didn't tell them what is expected from them

No doubth it's mainly manager fault,but..whatever the residents do in th Nothings houses Its planied..think it's 60/40 fault by manager/residents.Charlee and liss do precisely what's was agreeded,not inocent in This at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, golfer06 said:

3 people so far that like to see nothing?

tenor (16).gif  0   1.67 MB

tenor (17).gif  0   36.06 kB

giphy (34).gif  0   1.99 MB

That's not fair Golfer. That is not what I said at all. The question is whether or not Jeka's do nothing apts are worthy of of VHTV. My answer is that anyone who is on VHTV is worthy as long as they are getting what they want out of it. 

Also, my drive for realistic voyeurism does not mean that I want to see people sitting around not doing nothing. I've explained this over and over again. I expect tenants living in a voyeur house to mostly live their real "interesting" lives and not some pretend, rigged, life mostly designed to gets views. I call that cheating. If I wanted to see acting, rigged cam shows, paid performers, there's plenty of other places for that and #free!

But, it's no one's place to demand that VHTV remove any tenants cause no one has any idea how successful they are. Only VHTV and the managers know that. It's up to the tenant or manager to decide if they aren't making enough to stay. VHTV doesn't kick people out because of low views and when I voted yes above, that's the reason why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Amy3 said:

That's not fair Golfer. That is not what I said at all. The question is whether or not Jeka's do nothing apts are worthy of of VHTV. My answer is that anyone who is on VHTV is worthy as long as they are getting what they want out of it. 

Also, my drive for realistic voyeurism does not mean that I want to see people sitting around not doing nothing. I've explained this over and over again. I expect tenants living in a voyeur house to mostly live their real "interesting" lives and not some pretend, rigged, life mostly designed to gets views. I call that cheating. If I wanted to see acting, rigged cam shows, paid performers, there's plenty of other places for that and #free!

But, it's no one's place to demand that VHTV remove any tenants cause no one has any idea how successful they are. Only VHTV and the managers know that. It's up to the tenant or manager to decide if they aren't making enough to stay. VHTV doesn't kick people out because of low views and when I voted yes above, that's the reason why.

To me Amy th Nothings places are as acting as any other house in VH...but with all sex part taken out...they are there to act awarkard and to tease us one time after another,Personaly think it's an insult to the others places and residents that actualy try to be active and things going on with guests,situations etc.Amd Regard if an place it's sucesseful or not(regard the Nothings)..don't think it's coincidence that one lasted two months,second less than one,once curiosity passes..they are done.Basicaly are places and residents joking with viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ze81 said:

To me Amy th Nothings places are as acting as any other house in VH...but with all sex part taken out...they are there to act awarkard and to tease us one time after another,Personaly think it's an insult to the others places and residents that actualy try to be active and things going on with guests,situations etc.Amd Regard if an place it's sucesseful or not(regard the Nothings)..don't think it's coincidence that one lasted two months,second less than one,once curiosity passes..they are done.Basicaly are places and residents joking with viewers.

Just don't watch then, but also don't take away something someone else might enjoy just cause it's not what you like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...