Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, ze81 said:

Six months ago,maybe one year there were zero cam shows houses,now there are several,probrbay as some sayed Its the demand..but still Personaly it's pure crap and it's nothing related to an voyeur cam site.

You are right. But why do you think there are more now than before and why VH is okay with it? There's a reason that has something to do with getting new subscribers from the Chaturbate community. 

Posted
Just now, Amy3 said:

What about the other tenants? Is is fair for them to have to compete with camstars, who will literally do an abnormal, rather unreal sex show all day? These apts are popular believe it or not. Doesn't it put pressure on tenants to "perfirm" also? Soon, aren't they all performing and then what's the point really? 

This is the space that voyeur sites and tenants work in. They can do it, but they can only go so far before the subs just see porn and they leave because who wants to pay $40/month to watch live porn? 

I feel they are and will be forced to join this crap web cam shows sooner or later,Ruby,Ary,Nicole,Hector,Marla all them(well some won't end that way because they will prefer just to leave),just terrible.

Posted
1 minute ago, pahman said:

You are right. But why do you think there are more now than before and why VH is okay with it? There's a reason that has something to do with getting new subscribers from the Chaturbate community. 

Agree,but it's worth to loose the stable base users,clients for all this time to get those "new" chaturbate users?Maybe VH feels it's worth.With this move i only see one site winning...rlc.

Posted

And it continues dropping! The closer it gets to being viewed as porn or a cam show, the more subs feel like they are paying for something that can be seen for free. Twitter, panty sales, camstars, all of that weighs against a voyeur site. There is a balance point and if they go too far, collapse. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, ze81 said:

Agree,but it's worth to loose the stable base users,clients for all this time to get those "new" chaturbate users?Maybe VH feels it's worth.With this move i only see one site winning...rlc.

The majority of CB users havs no tokens. The ones who do want to get something for their money. Joining VHTV gets them nothing, not even a smile! 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

What about the other tenants? Is is fair for them to have to compete with camstars, who will literally do an abnormal, rather unreal sex show all day? These apts are popular believe it or not. Doesn't it put pressure on tenants to "perfirm" also? Soon, aren't they all performing and then what's the point really? 

This is the space that voyeur sites and tenants work in. They can do it, but they can only go so far before the subs just see porn and they leave because who wants to pay $40/month to watch live porn? 

These cam apts receive less viewers than normal apts. Meaning that VH pay them less than the others but they get most of their money from their cam shows. Dana and Chris are doing a lot with and without cam shows.

Posted

Personally, I simply ignore the cam shows and go to a different apartment.  I tend to think that those who are turned off by cam shows do the same..

Posted
5 minutes ago, ze81 said:

I feel they are and will be forced to join this crap web cam shows sooner or later,Ruby,Ary,Nicole,Hector,Marla all them(well some won't end that way because they will prefer just to leave),just terrible.

Yep! The "real" tenants who stay will be those who are doing this on the side and they don't need the money. They also tend to be very boring to watch. Money is motivating!

Posted
1 minute ago, pahman said:

These cam apts receive less viewers than normal apts. Meaning that VH pay them less than the others but they get most of their money from their cam shows. Dana and Chris are doing a lot with and without cam shows.

Nope! They do quite well compared to the other apts. Very well indeed! 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

And it continues dropping! The closer it gets to being viewed as porn or a cam show, the more subs feel like they are paying for something that can be seen for free. Twitter, panty sales, camstars, all of that weighs against a voyeur site. There is a balance point and if they go too far, collapse. 

Keep on dreaming @Amy3

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...