Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 Just in case you want to hear VHTV's take on the cunt in cam bullshit. They know better, but they take the money and ruin the voyeurism space anyways. Just go watch something else, just go watch something else, just go watch something else........all that has done is progressed their site into more and more cam whoring. Just keep looking the other way and make excuses for them. Goodbye voyeurism! Let VHTV walk you to the door. Dear Amy, Hello. We do not prohibit participants to make an action near of the cameras. They are not allowed to touch them or use any tokens or something like that. This is your personal opinion, but a lot of users are claiming more and more closeup angles every day. We can't be ideal for everyone, so if you don't like closeup action, you can skip it and watch for real life of other couples, who don't like such kind of performance. Best wishes, Voyeur House TV Support 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG 150 Posted March 18, 2020 Share Posted March 18, 2020 A weak excuse at best. I see cameras covered and moved all of the time on all of the sites, not just VHTV. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 Tagged another one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 So, who wants to be my next trophy on my wall? Step right up and shove your ass into a cam. Pitiful excuse for a voyeur tenant. Thief! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 We have a winner! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted March 18, 2020 Share Posted March 18, 2020 Even if you are not totally wrong on the merits, I find your criticisms against VHTV really hilarious Tell me how long have you been a premium member of this site? without lying please Now tell me really what has changed within VHTV so that you are so mad and at war with them? because from my point of view, most of your criticisms and reproaches were already in force from the opening of this project VHTV has never been a voyeurism site for the simple reason that they have always advertised events on twitter before they really happen and they trade with the hottest moments of different apartments via their archives However at that time, you were a premium member, you were advertising this site and you were happy to share these moments All this to say that I find your reviews quite hypocritical when we know all your history with VHTV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robwin Posted March 18, 2020 Share Posted March 18, 2020 18 minutes ago, moos54 said: Even if you are not totally wrong on the merits, All this to say that I find your reviews quite hypocritical when we know all your history with VHTV I do appreciate your point of view Moos and in many aspects you are right but personally, in the begining it was a much softer approach from the tenants and it all seemed ok then but as time has passed the tenants displays have become more blatant and more extreme to say the least. Maybe it was all a novelty initially and we all got on the bandwagon and paid our dues but as time has passed many of us have found many of the behaviour has become almost sex overload. How long can one pay to see the same thing over and over especially when we have found out the behaviour of many managers to be very extreme in both monetary wise and the high turnover rates. Yes maybe Amy is being a bit hypocritical but maybe over time it is so easy to think that way. Allowing the chaturbate aspect to be allowed probably hasn't helped but then as long as there is a demand and punters are prepared to pay for it I suppose it will continue. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted March 18, 2020 Share Posted March 18, 2020 13 minutes ago, Robwin said: I do appreciate your point of view Moos and in many aspects you are right but personally, in the begining it was a much softer approach from the tenants and it all seemed ok then but as time has passed the tenants displays have become more blatant and more extreme to say the least. Maybe it was all a novelty initially and we all got on the bandwagon and paid our dues but as time has passed many of us have found many of the behaviour has become almost sex overload. How long can one pay to see the same thing over and over especially when we have found out the behaviour of many managers to be very extreme in both monetary wise and the high turnover rates. Yes maybe Amy is being a bit hypocritical but maybe over time it is so easy to think that way. Allowing the chaturbate aspect to be allowed probably hasn't helped but then as long as there is a demand and punters are prepared to pay for it I suppose it will continue. Yes of course I completely agree with you, even me I saw the change of this project to become what it is now, it is also for one of these reasons that I never became premium of this site But we can't say that this site is no longer a voyeurism site when it never really was How many participants have created an account on CC to be able to chat with members? from my point of view of voyeur, only one is already one too many, from my point of view of forum moderator, it's cool because it generates content Amy was the first to contact these people on the forum, which is not really compatible with her idea of what voyeurism should be (which is also mine by the way) What I blame Amy for is being at war with VHTV and James for the simple reason that she no longer has the participants she loved in the project because if these girls were still present, she would still be a premium member of VHTV and this despite the changes to this site, and I remain convinced on that You for example, you saw the changes, you stopped being subscribed to this site but for as much you do not denigrate the project, you remain satirical of course but it is not in the same vein as Amy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 37 minutes ago, moos54 said: Even if you are not totally wrong on the merits, I find your criticisms against VHTV really hilarious Tell me how long have you been a premium member of this site? without lying please Now tell me really what has changed within VHTV so that you are so mad and at war with them? because from my point of view, most of your criticisms and reproaches were already in force from the opening of this project VHTV has never been a voyeurism site for the simple reason that they have always advertised events on twitter before they really happen and they trade with the hottest moments of different apartments via their archives However at that time, you were a premium member, you were advertising this site and you were happy to share these moments All this to say that I find your reviews quite hypocritical when we know all your history with VHTV I'm glad you find my criticisms hilarious. I find you hilarious too. Like a bully walking around the halls of CC with your big man, I'm smarter then you, attitude. Yep! Hilarious! I became a premium member about a year after I started following Voyeur-Villa. I joined CC in Nov 2013, well, sometimes Dec 2013, but whatever. Anyways, my first comment on CC wasn't until. 07 May 2016. The cunt in the cam tactic was not something that was in place in the beginning. VHTV changed in Dec 2017, when VHTV decided to be greedy and beat RLC. It was then that VHTV began the slide into camwhoring tenants. I have never liked the manager model and I have never liked the views for pay model. My points are just the fallout from VHTV's decisions. If VHTV is not voyeurism, then they need to change their name and stop advertising in this space. It's false advertising and has killed other site's ability to be successful in this genre. VHTV has progressed then all into having to do cam porn for survival. The voyeurism niche is supposed to be small. It's a special kind of fetish that VHTV insists on mainstreaming into something that it's not supposed to be. I'm not hypocritical. I've held VHTV's feet to the fire on all things voyeur the whole time. I used to be on the inside and I exposed many, many things to help VHTV be a better site, but that ended when James told me to fuck off after I got too close to the truth of how these managers were actually scamming these tenants. After that there was a time where I let it go and decided to just accept anything VHTV did. That didn't go so well and the people who I thought were my friends betrayed me and so I let them go and with the freedom to speak my mind as I saw fit the rest of the life of Amy3 is just the fallout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 19 minutes ago, Robwin said: I do appreciate your point of view Moos and in many aspects you are right but personally, in the begining it was a much softer approach from the tenants and it all seemed ok then but as time has passed the tenants displays have become more blatant and more extreme to say the least. Maybe it was all a novelty initially and we all got on the bandwagon and paid our dues but as time has passed many of us have found many of the behaviour has become almost sex overload. How long can one pay to see the same thing over and over especially when we have found out the behaviour of many managers to be very extreme in both monetary wise and the high turnover rates. Yes maybe Amy is being a bit hypocritical but maybe over time it is so easy to think that way. Allowing the chaturbate aspect to be allowed probably hasn't helped but then as long as there is a demand and punters are prepared to pay for it I suppose it will continue. Indeed! I do understand that to an extent this is a job. But, it is a job of being a voyeur tenant, not a camstar and for VHTV to just turn their cheek and pretend that it doesn't matter is an acceptance of this theft of views that these cunt shovers steal from the other tenants who don't engage in it. Being a voyeur tenant means living one's life as if the cams were not there, but with VHTV's views for pay model, it puts the cams in the full center of the minds of the tenants, payday! So much of what happens on VHTV becomes about winning views from camjohns and not winning views because of the interest of their personality and natural behavior. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy3 Posted March 18, 2020 Author Share Posted March 18, 2020 10 minutes ago, moos54 said: Yes of course I completely agree with you, even me I saw the change of this project to become what it is now, it is also for one of these reasons that I never became premium of this site But we can't say that this site is no longer a voyeurism site when it never really was How many participants have created an account on CC to be able to chat with members? from my point of view of voyeur, only one is already one too many, from my point of view of forum moderator, it's cool because it generates content Amy was the first to contact these people on the forum, which is not really compatible with her idea of what voyeurism should be (which is also mine by the way) What I blame Amy for is being at war with VHTV and James for the simple reason that she no longer has the participants she loved in the project because if these girls were still present, she would still be a premium member of VHTV and this despite the changes to this site, and I remain convinced on that You for example, you saw the changes, you stopped being subscribed to this site but for as much you do not denigrate the project, you remain satirical of course but it is not in the same vein as Amy It's not really true that I stopped being a member when my favorite girl, Violet left. I wasn't a member when she moved into the new place at the end. Up until Dec 2017, even James understood that there was a fine line between cam whoring and voyeurism. He respected voyeurism up until his greed got the best of him. Even though VHTV was oversexed even in the beginning it wasn't filled with people living in empty apt shoving their cunts into cams. I have always thought that the interaction with the tenants was not good. But, the onus on that policy isn't on me, it's on VHTV. I have explained this many times how it ruins the naturalness of the tenants experience and they should never make themselves visible to the forums. It would be far better if they never read the forums at all. It would also be far better if James and VHTV only corresponded to tickets. I wished that they had never poached forum members, people who were my friends, to work for them. It ruined their ability to be free to judge them and made them unequal members of the forums. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts