Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Ridgerunner said:

The more people that vote is not necessarily a plus for Democrats. In Florida Republicans have registered 140,000+ more new voters than have Democrats, in Pennsylvania Republicans have registered 103,000+ more new voters than have Democrats, and in Arizona Republicans have registered 40,000+ more new voters than have the Democrats.:cool:

The American voting system is really weird. "Republicans have registered more voters than Democrats"..etc. Really crazy. How come the parties can register voters - isn´t voting a confidential procedure?

In a democracy, all citizens of legal age have voting rights without an additional registration. And if electors are used, in the final election the electors will of course vote for the candidate they are representing, and they cannot be forced to vote for the other candidate in case he has won more votes in that state. We used to have the electors some thirty years ago, and there was of course the theoretical risk that some of them would change their mind in the final secret election and reject their original candidate, but that very seldom happened. And nowadays the direct voting works well and electors are no more needed. And the early votes are counted before the election day and published at the exact time the polling stations are closed on the election day - and the results of the early votes are usually very close to the final results.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Calle said:

The American voting system is really weird. "Republicans have registered more voters than Democrats"..etc. Really crazy. How come the parties can register voters - isn´t voting a confidential procedure?

In a democracy, all citizens of legal age have voting rights without an additional registration. And if electors are used, in the final election the electors will of course vote for the candidate they are representing, and they cannot be forced to vote for the other candidate in case he has won more votes in that state. We used to have the electors some thirty years ago, and there was of course the theoretical risk that some of them would change their mind in the final secret election and reject their original candidate, but that very seldom happened. And nowadays the direct voting works well and electors are no more needed. And the early votes are counted before the election day and published at the exact time the polling stations are closed on the election day - and the results of the early votes are usually very close to the final results.

You really shouldn't talk about something you totally don't understand. It makes you appear to be very stupid. Voting and registering are two totally separate issues. Registration is done prior to voting. The registration lists are used at election time to insure the integrity of the voting process. If there is no registration process like you suggest how do you prevent people from voting more than once in an election? 

Posted
15 hours ago, Nicholas said:

     Even so, look at what's been happening with the activist judges making rulings that ballots can be counted anywhere from a week to two weeks or longer after 11/3, not to mention the ones that have now ruled that signature verification is unnecessary. There are too many forces that are trying everything they can to make sure that someone who is a corrupt, crooked career establishment swamp rat politician that sold out to the communists of China, that is more than obviously in the early stages of senility and dementia, and quite possibly alzheimers, get's claimed as the next office holder of the presidency, just because they have ridiculously phsychotic cases of Trump derangement syndrome, no matter who get's put in charge of something like the nuclear codes, and so that the communists of China can finish their quest to finish buying out and taking over America along with other countries of the world while corrupt and crooked career swamp rat politicians that hold political offices in the U.S. government enrich themselves and their families all while it occurs.  

couldn't have described trump better than that.

 

Posted
14 hours ago, SPYING 1 said:

spacer.png

you missed the part where the red pill takers did anything to help any situation rationally. but you aren't alone as all of the republicans have done nothing to help regular people for many years.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...