Jump to content

US General Domestic Politics #39 Begins 11/14/21.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, StnCld316 said:

He may have been acquitted but how well can he put up playing survival. He's going to have a few coming for his head.

He can sell his AR-15 for big money💰 he can be hired for a security team

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ridgerunner said:

If people come for his head then they deserve the same treatment as the people who came for his head Kenosha, and that too will be ruled self defense.

Had he been a black man they would have found him guilty in an instant.  Kyle knows he's going to have to grow a set of eyes in the back of his head very quickly.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StnCld316 said:

Had he been a black man they would have found him guilty in an instant.  Kyle knows he's going to have to grow a set of eyes in the back of his head very quickly.

Just like they found O.J. guilty, right?  You watch too much left wing media. They've destroyed your brain.  Apparently, you didn't watch the trial in Kenosha.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

Had he been a black man they would have found him guilty in an instant.  Kyle knows he's going to have to grow a set of eyes in the back of his head very quickly.

You do not know that and cannot prove it to be true.  The real test will be with the Aubrey trial--3 white men ( and a former cop to boot) slaughtering an unarmed black boy who was doing nothing criminal.  It is very obvious that the defense attorney is racist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, happyone said:

You do not know that and cannot prove it to be true.  The real test will be with the Aubrey trial--3 white men ( and a former cop to boot) slaughtering an unarmed black boy who was doing nothing criminal.  It is very obvious that the defense attorney is racist. 

There will likely be a lot of appeals going on for awhile.  The Judge wasn't actually the most competent Judge. Since when does the defendant get to blind pick his own Jury.  That's solely for the Justice Department to do. The Attorney General should step in and declare a mistrial and order a new trial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

There will likely be a lot of appeals going on for awhile.  The Judge wasn't actually the most competent Judge. Since when does the defendant get to blind pick his own Jury.  That's solely for the Justice Department to do. The Attorney General should step in and declare a mistrial and order a new trial. 

Even MSNBC which was banned by Judge Schroeder disagrees with you.

WWW.MSNBC.COM

During this trial, Judge Bruce Schroeder handed down the type of evidentiary rulings that are made in courtrooms throughout the country every day.

Further--about the lottery drawing

Lastly, Schroeder also sparked outrage by allowing Rittenhouse to be the one to reach his hand in the tumbler and randomly pick which people would serve as jurors and which served as alternates. Let’s start with the most important fact first: There is no allegation that Rittenhouse, or anyone else, was able to rig the system and actually choose who sat on his jury. Again, this is apparently Schroeder’s regular practice. The worry is that this looks bad, and when it comes to questions of whether or not the judge is biasing the jury, that is a real concern. But it is not clear that allowing Rittenhouse, as opposed to a court clerk, to be the one to reach his hand in the tumbler made the jury think he is any more or less guilty of the crimes he was charged with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...