QuietDetect Posted February 23, 2022 Posted February 23, 2022 RLC: Some content is interesting for voyeurs, i.e natural behaviour by some participants ( nudity at home , sex etc ) to mention Leora - Masha - Karol - Martina ( Alberto ) - Linda ( Tibor ) but obviously you get bored with time watching the same faces/content , so you need renewal and that RLC DOES NOT HAVE. They keep recycling the same faces that have been there and the result is some of the veteran girls upon returning, are there just to clock time and get paid while showing/displaying nothing and having sex life outside of the camera views. You feel there is timeline manipulation by RLC into each participants as to when she should open up and start displaying. And in particular Kristy & Alana . You pay money to see them in panties at the maximum ! You pay money to see them massage each other while the LIGHTS ARE OFF ! You pay money to see them manipulate other new participants into showing less and less ( Example Marlene started well on her first week and got influenced by Kristy to display less - I understand Russian ) . Not worth a penny watching. Mind you these two ( Alana & Kristy ) have been before on the site and the behaviour was different and natural ( That was when they were in the now closed Russian appartments), then we saw lots of nudity and sex on cams. But the veterans become complacent after numerous returns to the project and RLC does not give a damn ( You write to them as a loyal subscriber and you never get a response ), because there are still people around that are willing to pay to watch girls exercise in yoga pants ! Kristy & Alana & many other participants are damaging RLC service beyond repair... RLC used to be the voyeur site to watch but not anymore. It is still being carried by girls like Leora but its waning out and gradually become rubbish. If you want to watch girls in panties or exercising in their clothes or sitting in the living room surfing their mobile phones all the time then the internet is vast and free. No point paying money to watch this kind of garbage and RLC does not want to listen ... VHTV: On the contrary, VHTV seems to understand the mentality of voyeurs around the world and they are very proactive in terms of responding to suggestions. Moreover, they are constantly renewing their content in terms of participants, lots of nudity , lots of sex, you see particpants cleaning naked , cooking naked , doing all sorts of activities while in the nude or in semi undressed state. Also the sex content is rich and to satisfy all tastes. The only drawback and which in my opinion is a major one is their infrastructure which needs upgrading . The cameras quality and resolution on VHTV are no match to the ones on RLC and this is a big turn off for subscribers and this is why RLC still has market share. Moreover, VHTV can improve service by extending replay periods ( They have 24 hour while RLC has ten days ) plus some other improvements for end user ( for examle there is no thumbnail hovering while scrolling the cams in an appartment at VHTV and when looking into their 24 hour replay, the activity detection on the graph under the cam is not consistent - meaning you can not visually recognise where the activity was by looking at the graph because the graph is misrepresented by false activity spikes whereas on RLC the spike is definite and when you hover over the spike you definitely see replay activity and the thumbnail of the activity in that room at that particular point of time. These are the sort of end user improvements that VHTV needs to make, especially the cam resolution / brightness in order to throw RLC into oblivion. In short at RLC the infrastructure is good but you pay money to see nothing so definitelty not worth your dollar. At VHTV the content is good but the infrastructure needs improvement, definitely worth a try. Humble opinion as a subscriber on both sites but will no longer be on RLC when my subscription expires next month after 3 years with them...
moos54 Posted February 23, 2022 Posted February 23, 2022 1 hour ago, QuietDetect said: RLC: Some content is interesting for voyeurs, i.e natural behaviour by some participants ( nudity at home , sex etc ) to mention Leora - Masha - Karol - Martina ( Alberto ) - Linda ( Tibor ) but obviously you get bored with time watching the same faces/content , so you need renewal and that RLC DOES NOT HAVE. They keep recycling the same faces that have been there and the result is some of the veteran girls upon returning, are there just to clock time and get paid while showing/displaying nothing and having sex life outside of the camera views. You feel there is timeline manipulation by RLC into each participants as to when she should open up and start displaying. And in particular Kristy & Alana . You pay money to see them in panties at the maximum ! You pay money to see them massage each other while the LIGHTS ARE OFF ! You pay money to see them manipulate other new participants into showing less and less ( Example Marlene started well on her first week and got influenced by Kristy to display less - I understand Russian ) . Not worth a penny watching. Mind you these two ( Alana & Kristy ) have been before on the site and the behaviour was different and natural ( That was when they were in the now closed Russian appartments), then we saw lots of nudity and sex on cams. But the veterans become complacent after numerous returns to the project and RLC does not give a damn ( You write to them as a loyal subscriber and you never get a response ), because there are still people around that are willing to pay to watch girls exercise in yoga pants ! Kristy & Alana & many other participants are damaging RLC service beyond repair... RLC used to be the voyeur site to watch but not anymore. It is still being carried by girls like Leora but its waning out and gradually become rubbish. If you want to watch girls in panties or exercising in their clothes or sitting in the living room surfing their mobile phones all the time then the internet is vast and free. No point paying money to watch this kind of garbage and RLC does not want to listen ... VHTV: On the contrary, VHTV seems to understand the mentality of voyeurs around the world and they are very proactive in terms of responding to suggestions. Moreover, they are constantly renewing their content in terms of participants, lots of nudity , lots of sex, you see particpants cleaning naked , cooking naked , doing all sorts of activities while in the nude or in semi undressed state. Also the sex content is rich and to satisfy all tastes. The only drawback and which in my opinion is a major one is their infrastructure which needs upgrading . The cameras quality and resolution on VHTV are no match to the ones on RLC and this is a big turn off for subscribers and this is why RLC still has market share. Moreover, VHTV can improve service by extending replay periods ( They have 24 hour while RLC has ten days ) plus some other improvements for end user ( for examle there is no thumbnail hovering while scrolling the cams in an appartment at VHTV and when looking into their 24 hour replay, the activity detection on the graph under the cam is not consistent - meaning you can not visually recognise where the activity was by looking at the graph because the graph is misrepresented by false activity spikes whereas on RLC the spike is definite and when you hover over the spike you definitely see replay activity and the thumbnail of the activity in that room at that particular point of time. These are the sort of end user improvements that VHTV needs to make, especially the cam resolution / brightness in order to throw RLC into oblivion. In short at RLC the infrastructure is good but you pay money to see nothing so definitelty not worth your dollar. At VHTV the content is good but the infrastructure needs improvement, definitely worth a try. Humble opinion as a subscriber on both sites but will no longer be on RLC when my subscription expires next month after 3 years with them... It is difficult to make a comparison between the two projects because they are very different Beyond taking into account the quantity or the quality, I think that it is also necessary to take into account the human values that each project seems to defend, for that I think that it is necessary to be interested in the participants and to see how they live From there, everyone is free to make their own decision to give their money for a subscription. For my part, I try to pay attention to many things, be it the different projects, the profiles of the participants and especially the information that some members can give within the forum because they understand the language Taking all this into account, I make my own opinion of things, and despite the passing years, I still have a preference for one project over the other.
Howard Posted February 23, 2022 Posted February 23, 2022 Here's my take on RLC vs VH: Keep in mind these are general views and apply to the majority of participants. VH is about lost souls and survival. IMO, most come from terrible home conditions (possibly including child or spousal abuse), raised with few values as would be the norm in a conventional society. VH participants are rebellious (tattoos are often a sign of rebellion as is screwing for the world to see), feel omnipotent, and they are more concerned with having a roof over their heads then money in the bank. They have very few morals and ethics. They live day to day (some hour-to-hour), not thinking about their future. A large majority of VH participants are not people you want to take home with you to visit your parents. RLC participants are more likely to become contributing members of society. They have similarities to VH, but they don't necessarily come from severely broken homes (parents were possibly divorced, but I don't see indications of abuse). They are not so much rebellious as they are seeking independence. These are folks that may be more interested in liking to be watched, then getting naked for the sake of having shelter provided. Many are educated (or getting educated), see a future for themselves off camera (there are exceptions), and hope to better themselves in general. They are willing to get naked on camera as a first step to improving their lives and could possibility go on to be contributing members of society (I don't see that happening for most VH participants). 1
dougiestyle4u Posted February 24, 2022 Posted February 24, 2022 BOTH SITES SUCK!!! since they have much more negatives than any slight positives. My advice - don't subscribe to either site. 1
ARMY SNIPER Posted February 24, 2022 Posted February 24, 2022 4 hours ago, dougiestyle4u said: BOTH SITES SUCK!!! since they have much more negatives than any slight positives. My advice - don't subscribe to either site. Way ahead of you Dougie ...I for one Don't...i"m not gonna give my money to either. or any other site like them. anybody that does that's fine. 2
HarleyFatboy Posted February 24, 2022 Posted February 24, 2022 9 hours ago, dougiestyle4u said: BOTH SITES SUCK!!! since they have much more negatives than any slight positives. My advice - don't subscribe to either site. 1
Fritzhonka Posted July 21, 2022 Posted July 21, 2022 Voyeur house has truly awful sound, it is actually a disgrace.
Recommended Posts