B1 - General Topic 2022 #14 (April)

[Alladino]

46 minutes ago, costa049 said:

I will repeat that you don't have credibility and the right to complain about content of a service because of not understanding the concept of the service. And even continue paying for it.

 

There is obviously more to this issue than your opinion. I think at least that such a statement as "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE", is not fulfilled if the residents simply live out everything private somewhere else. It makes no sense to have girls in the cast who do nothing for months and live in these apartments as if they were nuns. Although I strongly believe that even nuns have more sex than some of the girls in the GOV apartments. 😂

Anyway, even if you're right, which I don't think you are, it's still just boring for a voyeur with so many girls doing almost nothing. Why not just bring girls into the cast who really live in these apartments. Not like these bullshit show girls, but really live there normally (including their sexual life).

 

[Mauri]

2 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

Ovviamente c'è di più su questo problema oltre alla tua opinione. Penso almeno che una tale affermazione come "LA VITA PRIVATA DI ALTRE PERSONE", non si realizza se i residenti semplicemente vivono tutto privato da qualche altra parte. Non ha senso avere nel cast ragazze che non fanno nulla per mesi e vivono in questi appartamenti come se fossero suore. Anche se credo fermamente che anche le suore facciano più sesso di alcune ragazze negli appartamenti del GOV. 😂

Comunque, anche se hai ragione, cosa che non credo tu abbia, è comunque noioso per un voyeur con così tante ragazze che non fanno quasi nulla. Perché non portare nel cast solo ragazze che vivono davvero in questi appartamenti. Non come queste ragazze dello spettacolo di merda, ma ci vivono davvero normalmente (compresa la loro vita sessuale).

 

Potreste avere ragione se il sito si chiamasse "La vita sessuale di altre persone h/24"  ma dal momento che si chiama Lavita privata di altre persone, la vita privata non e' fatta di solo sesso. Esattamente come nella la vostra vita.

[piedpiper1968]

It would appear Marlene is on her period. Don't know when it started but here she is inserting a tampon. 

RLC Replay

REPLAY.REALLIFECAM.COM

---

Watch your favorite cams in 24-hour recording

 

[Alladino]

1 minute ago, Mauri said:

You might be right if the site was called "Other people's sex life h/24" but since it's called Other people's private life, private life is not just sex. Exactly as in your life.

 

I totally agree with you, sex alone is not enough either. In the couple apartments are a lot more real guests, sometimes even the families. This is not to be seen with most girls in GOV or very rare. It is a major weakness of the GOV concept, because the girls are like ripped out of their actual lives.

Nevertheless, the sexual life is part of the private life. In my opinion it is the most important part for a site like RLC, because it is the most exciting for the voyeur. That in GOV are so many girls who have no or almost no sex, or if so, often only as this unrealistic sex show events, is simply not "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE".

[costa049]

15 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

There is obviously more to this issue than your opinion. I think at least that such a statement as "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE", is not fulfilled if the residents simply live out everything private somewhere else. It makes no sense to have girls in the cast who do nothing for months and live in these apartments as if they were nuns. Although I strongly believe that even nuns have more sex than some of the girls in the GOV apartments. 😂

Anyway, even if you're right, which I don't think you are, it's still just boring for a voyeur with so many girls doing almost nothing. Why not just bring girls into the cast who really live in these apartments. Not like these bullshit show girls, but really live there normally (including their sexual life).

 

It is not my opinion, it is people's misunderstanding of the concept of the project.

[thinga69]

11 minutes ago, piedpiper1968 said:

It would appear Marlene is on her period. Don't know when it started but here she is inserting a tampon. 

RLC Replay

REPLAY.REALLIFECAM.COM

---

Watch your favorite cams in 24-hour recording

 

Thank god. 🙏😂

[costa049]

9 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

I totally agree with you, sex alone is not enough either. In the couple apartments are a lot more real guests, sometimes even the families. This is not to be seen with most girls in GOV or very rare. It is a major weakness of the GOV concept, because the girls are like ripped out of their actual lives.

Nevertheless, the sexual life is part of the private life. In my opinion it is the most important part for a site like RLC, because it is the most exciting for the voyeur. That in GOV are so many girls who have no or almost no sex, or if so, often only as this unrealistic sex show events, is simply not "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE".

This is what viewers expect to happen, not what it shall be. And the main difference from couples is just that they are "on vacation". And they're living their private lives while "on vacation".

[Alladino]

13 minutes ago, costa049 said:

It is not my opinion, it is people's misunderstanding of the concept of the project.

 

It is your opinion that they misunderstand.  I, for example, think you got the concept of the project wrong. If you knew the good old RLC, you would know that RLC once lived up to their motto much better and have since lost much of their quality. The fact that they have failed to change their motto means that people rightly continue to expect real life content.

 

9 minutes ago, costa049 said:

This is what viewers expect to happen, not what it shall be. And the main difference from couples is just that they are "on vacation". And they're living their private lives while "on vacation".

 

As if the residents would suddenly lose their sexual drive while traveling. Also, this is not like a normal vacation. Most girls are there for months. Who really believes that the girls do not have sex, is really quite naive. No, the problem is that the sex with many of the girls takes place only or almost only off camera.

[costa049]

27 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

It is your opinion that they misunderstand.  I, for example, think you got the concept of the project wrong. If you knew the good old RLC, you would know that RLC once lived up to their motto much better and have since lost much of their quality. The fact that they have failed to change their motto means that people rightly continue to expect real life content.

 

 

As if the residents would suddenly lose their sexual drive while traveling. Also, this is not like a normal vacation. Most girls are there for months. Who really believes that the girls do not have sex, is really quite naive. No, the problem is that the sex with many of the girls takes place only or almost only off camera.

They don't say anywhere it is a porn or any other type of site. Viewers expect that type of content to happen, and when it happens (which is highly likely, as they advice themselves), it is a bonus.

And if a girl doesn't have sex or bate on cams on a certain moment, it doesn't mean that they don't do it. And it also doesn't mean they can't still do it on cams, which as I previously said is highly likely.

And when I say people misunderstand the concept, it's because they keep thinking this is a porn site and keep talking about what the tenants should or shouldn't do, when they aren't obligated to do anything, since it is about "the private life of other people", and as they state themselves in their FAQ, "People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship - just 24/7 life as it is.", and also "People living in the apartments are real people leading active way of life. They can be at work, studying, working out in the gym or simply leave to do the shopping. Pay attention to the time zone you are in because it might differ from the one the people you are watching are living in.". And this doesn't mean they failed to change their motto, they are providing what they state, sometimes with better or worse choices.

[thinga69]

Looks like Karol is taking more thing to her house.

[costa049]

13 minutes ago, thinga69 said:

Looks like Karol is taking more thing to her house.

Yep. Let's see if she's about to leave soon or not and if any of the sisters take the room.

[Alladino]

2 minutes ago, costa049 said:

They don't say anywhere it is a porn or any other type of site. Viewers expect it to happen, and when it happens (which is highly likely, as they advice themselves), it is a bonus.

And if a girl doesn't have sex or bate on cams on a certain moment, it doesn't mean that they don't do it, and they can be doing it somewhere else. And it also doesn't mean they can't still do it on cams, which as I previously said is highly likely.

And when I say people misunderstand the concept, it's because they keep thinking this is a porn site and keep talking about what the tenants should or shouldn't do, when it is about "the private life of other people", and as they state themselves in their FAQ, "People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship - just 24/7 life as it is.".

 

That is exactly the problem. RLC is lying through its teeth in its own FAQ when the write "People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship - just 24/7 life as it is.". This motton matched well the good old RLC, but today, especially in GOV, there is unfortunately very little of real life left. In GOV, there are girls who literally stick their genitals into the camera for hours. This is completely unrealistic and is another sign of how bad the quality of RLC has become. The girls would never do that if there were no cameras.

However, this is not the only problem with GOV. As I said, for many here it is quite obvious that the girls do not really live in these apartments. I think you can see that especially well in the fact that many of the girls there do not have a normal sexual life in front of the camera. The girls are there for months and absolutely nothing happens. This is completely unrealistic. Please do not forget that the girls are young, healthy and mostly good-looking. They have a sexual life. The reason that you don't see anything or almost nothing of this in GOV is that the girls don't really participate in the project.

Again, I don't think the view into the private life of the girls is a bonus, this is the content that RLC intended. Important would be, that RLC also has girls in the cast, who really participate according to their motto and not just wait for the time to pass and then collect the money without really participating.