Noldus Posted Sunday at 04:43 AM Author Posted Sunday at 04:43 AM 16 minutes ago, StnCld316 said: That means of a good probability they will not be back. That probably only applies to the clean-shaven guy. But the reason they removed the replay is probably something else, since we can still see the guy there 1 1 Quote
Maxbell Posted Sunday at 06:07 AM Posted Sunday at 06:07 AM 1 hour ago, StnCld316 said: That means of a good probability they will not be back. The one guy had been there before, getting busy with Gelia, but stopped before his clothes were off. It was suspected that maybe the cameras made him shy. I’m not sure if he knew they were there or not. 🤷♂️ Quote
StnCld316 Posted Sunday at 06:17 AM Posted Sunday at 06:17 AM 4 minutes ago, Maxbell said: The one guy had been there before, getting busy with Gelia, but stopped before his clothes were off. It was suspected that maybe the cameras made him shy. I’m not sure if he knew they were there or not. 🤷♂️ Tenants should let their guests know about the camera before they even step onto the property. It becomes a liability for RLC when tenants don’t follow the proper procedures due to legal repercussions. 2 Quote
NoOneSpecial Posted Sunday at 06:53 AM Posted Sunday at 06:53 AM 33 minutes ago, StnCld316 said: Tenants should let their guests know about the camera before they even step onto the property. It becomes a liability for RLC when tenants don’t follow the proper procedures due to legal repercussions. You'd think some sort of acknowledgement or release would have to be on file. 1 Quote
ddhm Posted Sunday at 07:14 AM Posted Sunday at 07:14 AM 8 hours ago, Maxbell said: So, if they were about to have sex, and the cameras went black, someone would have commented. ‘if they had sex, and cameras were on, there would have been lots of comments, even though they replay was deleted later. ‘We might be saying the same thing. I can’t really tell as I didn’t watch . For sure , if sex had happened , it would have been mentioned ( or kisses or foreplay , whatever minor ) . But again , I am surprised that nearly 7 hours of recording was deleted only to be able in the end and see the guy( s) faces - in case one of them or maybe both asked that they are deleted - . 1 Quote
coolcucumber Posted Sunday at 09:58 AM Posted Sunday at 09:58 AM Lunette and Ada are such a borefest, bloody hell. 1 Quote
Pete1960 Posted Sunday at 08:59 PM Posted Sunday at 08:59 PM On 1/18/2026 at 4:19 AM, Maxbell said: Technically speaking we don’t know they did. If you look back about 4 pages, ddhm gave his thoughts on it that are fairly plausible. If something did happen they obviously didn’t ban her from their properties. lol. ‘From the Vewers point of view she brought more to the table than many of the girls and I kinda of like her eccentricities We are on page 2 Quote
Maxbell Posted Sunday at 09:43 PM Posted Sunday at 09:43 PM 42 minutes ago, Pete1960 said: We are on page 2 lol, it was page 1 when I said that. 😁 Quote
Brit Guy Posted Sunday at 09:45 PM Posted Sunday at 09:45 PM Just now, Maxbell said: lol, it was page 1 when I said that. 😁 It's called nitpicking. Quote
Pete1960 Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM Posted yesterday at 02:42 AM 4 hours ago, Brit Guy said: It's called nitpicking. Yes you are 1 Quote
Brit Guy Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 8 hours ago, Pete1960 said: Yes you are You actually said something without being unkind 😆 Quote
Maxbell Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Is Annette moving in? She looks like she is taking over part of the closet 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.