B4 2026 #89 (October)

[CuriousOne693]

1 minute ago, Brit Guy said:

Masshole's cock worshipper just gave her gash a good wash in the BR. Surely it's her nose she should be washing from all the snorting she's done this weekend 😶 😆

Another AP 🤣

[Epikouros]

il y a 32 minutes, miscvoyeur a dit :

Why would RLC get rid of girls who are willing to provide entertainment like Kaya, Sav and Medusa (and others) but keep the do nothings like Noa? Who knows wtf kind of thought process they have in their decision making? But it's not me as a customer to figure that out, it's only my job to decide whether or not to continue to give them money based on what I enjoy seeing. 

So, not "demonstrably" untrue, then. 😉 

Perhaps they warn their tenants to not have close contacts with VHTV tenants, but I don't think they really have the ways nor the will to actually check & follow up on that... With the possible exception, perhaps, of ex-RLC tenants (because easy to recognise).

As for them getting rid of promising/entertaining tenants: might have to do with internal politicking & intrigue we know nothing or very little about, but the reason for kicking (rightly or wrongly) entertaining tenants was almost certainly not because they were entertaining, but something else entirely (possibly unjustified, but essentially unknown; could be lots of things)...

And as a consequence they have to keep the more boring ones because otherwise they have empty villas & apartments.

I'm afraid firing them took less time than scouring cams & replays for possible VHTV interlopers... Or perhaps the banished were seen having a coffee in town with someone who used to be a VHTV tenant five years ago without realising it and mercilessly sent packing?... 😛😉 

[Sulzer]

Just now, CuriousOne693 said:

Another AP 🤣

He can't help it, its constant none stop bullshit. Seriously not worth a reply or a reaction. 😉

[Brit Guy]

4 minutes ago, CuriousOne693 said:

Another AP 🤣

Sharing is caring, but there's only one AP on here 😘

[MrTickler]

Massimo top cam, saving the villa again, in the Kitchen and just simulated sex with Ellaya from behind. 

[Maxbell]

In a perfect world a guest would have to sign a release form prior to entering the villa that states the guest understands they are on camera.
In that form would also be some other stipulations such as that you are at least 18 years old. 

I don’t think this is done, but that’s how you enforce those rules. 

[CuriousOne693]

8 minutes ago, MrTickler said:

Massimo top cam, saving the villa again, in the Kitchen and just simulated sex with Ellaya from behind. 

What a hero. Yesterday's hero.

 

[MrTickler]

il y a 3 minutes, CuriousOne693 a dit :

What a hero. Yesterday's hero.

 

Hopefully tomorrow Noa is the hero, that is if she ain't hiding in the FR restroom😁

[Epikouros]

il y a 11 minutes, Maxbell a dit :

In a perfect world a guest would have to sign a release form prior to entering the villa that states the guest understands they are on camera.
In that form would also be some other stipulations such as that you are at least 18 years old. 

I don’t think this is done, but that’s how you enforce those rules. 

Not really practicable imo... And would also kill the spontaneity of some guests. Also a hassle for someone just dropping by.

But i always understood guests have to be told about the cams by their hosts, and tenants are not allowed to bring in or host minors.

Though at a barbecue or other public gathering or with other family members (mom/family visiting) around it probably couldn't do much harm anyway (just like an ex-tenant carrying her newborn baby & showing it to her friends imo), but they have to be careful... You can get (metaphorically) crucified for less...

[thereala78]

5 minutes ago, Maxbell said:

In a perfect world a guest would have to sign a release form prior to entering the villa that states the guest understands they are on camera.
In that form would also be some other stipulations such as that you are at least 18 years old. 

I don’t think this is done, but that’s how you enforce those rules. 

It's actually what they should do yes but of course they never do that... 😛 

[Captain Kangaroo]

29 minutes ago, Maxbell said:

In a perfect world a guest would have to sign a release form prior to entering the villa that states the guest understands they are on camera.
In that form would also be some other stipulations such as that you are at least 18 years old. 

I don’t think this is done, but that’s how you enforce those rules. 

Many years ago under previous ownership all visitors did have to do exactly this. Nina and Kira had a friend over and they all got drunk together and then engaged in a threesome. The girl then sued RLC stating she was NOT informed of the cams or the fact they recorded in the dark

If I'm not mistaken after the law suit many of the doors to the apartments would have signs stuck on them indicating the presence of cams. You could see them when there was a hall cam that picked up a open door that swung inwards

[Captain Kangaroo]

16 minutes ago, CuriousOne693 said:

What a hero. Yesterday's hero.

 

I'm digging the 70s satin shirt 🤣