Kamila & Kristy ~ General Chat for this Apartment May 01,2016. to May 31,2016.

[slider_69]

13 minutes ago, corboblanc said:

je suis désolé, mais ce que vous dites n'est que spéculation et avis personnel. il n'y a aucune preuve officielle et indiscutable, que les participantes de rlc reçoivent un salaire!!! cette discussion est la même depuis plus de 3 ans, et la seule chose que nous savons avec certitude, c'est que le loyer et les charges des appartements des participants, est payé par rlc, rien d'autre!!! si RLC payait un salaire à Lev, vous imaginez l'état dépressif de la direction de la société?!!!

I'm sorry, but what you say is only speculation and personal opinion. there is no official and indisputable evidence that participating in rlc receive a salary !!! this discussion is the same for more than 3 years, and the only thing we know for sure is that the rent and charges apartments participant is paid by rlc, nothing else !!! if RLC paid a salary Lev, can you imagine the depression of the management of the company? !!!

  You are probably right in most cases. However; you certainly do not believe that Kami and Kristy returned to RLC just to have some place to live, do you ? They did not return to show the whole world their asses and Honey pots and BI actions for free..........that is a certainty ! Maybe the other apartments are not being paid a salary or bonus, but these 2 ladies are, as you say, models ...........and they returned for a purpose !  That purpose to attract new subscriptions and also to exhibit their  "wares" to model agencies . Don't forget...this is Kami's 3rd run on RLC !

 

[kitek]

24 minutes ago, spielo said:

Even if RLC is not paying a salary, the cost of such a flat in Moscow is much higher than a Russian average salary. And therefore there is an obligation...

If there was one they would stay home more than anyone else and that's not the case. 

As they plan things ahead: vacations, work trips, etc... they're living their lives as they wish this isn't VV where tenants are performing every night.

[kitek]

Kristy for next 3 days will work until 16:00 beside that she still goes to school in the afternoons. 

[smurfy08]

43 minutes ago, spielo said:

And therefore there is an obligation...

How can you be so sure ? What is that obligation then ? "..." does not mean much.

 

[alanohio]

As Corbo said, this discussion about a salary has been going on a long time. I think they get free rent, free utilities, and maybe a food allowance.

Yes, there is somewhat of an expectation, but as I've said before, this isn't a porn stage with a director. It's reasonable to assume RLC lays out the situation in this way...

"...obviously, a majority of subscribers are looking for nakedness and sex. These things are what brings a bigger audience, and that is what will play a part in how long we both are willing to renew our contract..."

The above line is the way I see the situation is presented. As long as the apartment continues to draw visitors, they are safe. And I don't see the girls apartments being handled any differently other than they are all girls, which raises the possibility of lesbian action.

In other words, there is no "obligation" or "requirement" to show anything, other than the risk involved of not getting a contract renewal.

If you look at things this way, everything that happens in ALL the apartments suddenly makes sense.

[albacore]

Their (the girls or tenets) obligation is to RLC not to us.  RLC is the one has an obligation to (us) the paying subscribers.  Don't confuse those obligations.  It makes a difference thinking about it that way. They (the tenets) need to satisfy whatever requirement RLC has specified and we don't know what that is.  Some here assume that they are not doing this. However if that were true they would most likely be gone.  As far as we know they are a cash cow to RLC whether they are there all the time or not. We really have no idea. 

People will complain that they should now get rid of the apartment as it will be empty for a little while again.  However those same people well be praising things when they return and do something that they now like.  I think RLC probably knows this.  It is just us that don't know what is behind the scenes and so we speculate to the negative.  

Now I am not a defender of RLC and I think they should do things a little differently as well.  It would be good if RLC was more forthcoming (maybe in its FAQ) about the terms of their contracts and expectations but I suspect it varies depending on the apartment and it's profitability.  But the girls work for RLC who pays them.  We pay RLC and RLC is the one who needs to deliver.  However I think they think they are delivering based on "their" business model not ours.  They as all businesses are driven by profits.  I would have to assume their profits are pretty good if they continue to do what they do.   Some here say they are in a downward spiral or there business model is dying or they have no idea what they are doing - but I really think that is just sour grapes.  Every day that I come here the site is up and apartments are here and they seem to be adding them over time.  It says something.

 

 

[alanohio]

2 minutes ago, albacore said:

Their (the girls or tenets) obligation is to RLC not to us.  RLC is the one has an obligation to (us) the paying subscribers.  Don't confuse those obligations.  It makes a difference thinking about it that way. They (the tenets) need to satisfy whatever requirement RLC has specified and we don't know what that is.  Some here assume that they are not doing this. However if that were true they would most likely be gone.  As far as we know they are a cash cow to RLC whether they are there all the time or not. We really have no idea. 

People will complain that they should now get rid of the apartment as it will be empty for a little while again.  However those same people well be praising things when they return and do something that they now like.  I think RLC probably knows this.  It is just us that don't know what is behind the scenes and so we speculate to the negative.  

Now I am not a defender of RLC and I think they should do things a little differently as well.  It would be good if RLC was more forthcoming (maybe in its FAQ) about the terms of their contracts and expectations but I suspect it varies depending on the apartment and it's profitability.  But the girls work for RLC who pays them.  We pay RLC and RLC is the one who needs to deliver.  However I think they think they are delivering based on "their" business model not ours.  They as all businesses are driven by profits.  I would have to assume their profits are pretty good if they continue to do what they do.   Some here say they are in a downward spiral or there business model is dying or they have no idea what they are doing - but I really think that is just sour grapes.  Every day that I come here the site is up and apartments are here and they seem to be adding them over time.  It says something.

 

 

I'll only take issue with one point - indirectly - If we assume the current measure of how much "skin" is shown is, in fact, RLC's "expectation", then that suggests heavily that they do not require much from their tenants. Some apartments show a lot, some show little, and all the apartments are still there. If anything, that would suggest they require little other than letting them know what might end a contract = if they show nothing.

[albacore]

7 minutes ago, alanohio said:

I'll only take issue with one point - indirectly - If we assume the current measure of how much "skin" is shown is, in fact, RLC's "expectation", then that suggests heavily that they do not require much from their tenants. Some apartments show a lot, some show little, and all the apartments are still there. If anything, that would suggest they require little other than letting them know what might end a contract = if they show nothing.

Well again you are "assuming" what their expectation is.  The problem is we don't know (and probably never will) and get all worked up over what "our" expectations are and how they are not being met.  I just try to not do that and take what I get.  Then I am not disappointed.  I have always said when I don't like what RLC offers I will leave - like I would with any business.

I do agree with you that it would seem they do not require much from their tenants. And there really is not much evidence to the contrary.  They may offer incentives to them but again we don't know. 

 

[Beldonn1]

1 hour ago, kitek said:

Kristy for next 3 days will work until 16:00 beside that she still goes to school in the afternoons. 

Do you have any idea when Kami is due back ?

[corboblanc]

Il y a 2 heures, spielo a dit :

Même si RLC ne paie pas un salaire, le coût d'un tel appartement à Moscou est beaucoup plus élevé qu'un salaire moyen russe. Et donc il y a une obligation ...

vivre devant des caméras 24h/24, 7 jours/7, pendant de nombreux mois, est déjà une très lourde obligation!!! montrer son cul à des milliers d'inconnus qui épient le moindre de vos gestes, jours et nuit, est aussi une grosse contrainte, qui n'ai pas accessible à tous le monde!!!

live before the cameras 24h / 24, 7/7, for many months, is already a very heavy obligation !!! show her ass to thousands of strangers who watch any of your actions, day and night, is also a major constraint, which did not accessible to everyone !!!

[slider_69]

1 hour ago, alanohio said:

I'll only take issue with one point - indirectly - If we assume the current measure of how much "skin" is shown is, in fact, RLC's "expectation", then that suggests heavily that they do not require much from their tenants. Some apartments show a lot, some show little, and all the apartments are still there. If anything, that would suggest they require little other than letting them know what might end a contract = if they show nothing.

 All your arguments seem valid; however, what if Kami and Kristy have a different or unique type of contract, since they are so popular ?  I believe it is fair to assume that these 2 girls get a good salary, in addition to their free vacations ( often referred to as job assignments ). Famous models, as these girls would like to be,  do not show themselves taking baths, masturbating, and playing with each other on the internet !  These are 2 girls hoping to become famous but they assume that will probably never happen.................so they  WORK for RLC in order to make a living and possibly meet someone to marry . ( Now don't get all bent out of shape, this is just my opinion...LOL ) . 

[alanohio]

16 minutes ago, slider_69 said:

 All your arguments seem valid; however, what if Kami and Kristy have a different or unique type of contract, since they are so popular ?  I believe it is fair to assume that these 2 girls get a good salary, in addition to their free vacations ( often referred to as job assignments ). Famous models, as these girls would like to be,  do not show themselves taking baths, masturbating, and playing with each other on the internet !  These are 2 girls hoping to become famous but they assume that will probably never happen.................so they  WORK for RLC in order to make a living and possibly meet someone to marry . ( Now don't get all bent out of shape, this is just my opinion...LOL ) . 

Nah, I only get bent out of shape by people who like to throw around insults.

I agree the scenario you posed "could" be possible. If RLC were to publish their contracts tomorrow and that's the way K&K's contract read, I would only be mildly surprised. I only wanted to point out that the simplest explanations are usually the right ones. Sherlock Holmes said that LOL.