Ozi

(The Image associated with this comment is no longer accessible and has been removed). I'm in love :-* :-* :-*

If you CAN tick all the boxes, it's probably NOT suitable for CC.

As a result of an unbelievable coincidence and freak of nature, a white mine site worker fell down a 20 mtr shaft and a black co-worker fell down a 40 mtr shaft at the other end of the mine site. Unfortunately the black miner was unable to be saved but his white colleague is recovering well. During a heated press conference where the rescue team was accused of racism, the team leader spoke out to defend his men. " We are not racists, we have received training to ensure there is no discrimination in our workforce. We have been taught to treat everybody equally and we did, we threw them both a 30 mtr rope".

My shout if you can guess the language. No takers for the language? That was a cheap round. I know it would have been hard to try a translator as it was a jpeg, but it wouldn't have helped. Had me confused till my wife translated it for me, its Pitmans shorthand. A lost art I would imagine.

Been practising my Arabic. Don't think I'll have time for the whole language, so sticking to critical phrases like اللعنة، نحن بالكامل. على أرض الواقع، والوجه لأسفل بالك لام. إيقاف أو أنا سوف تبادل لإطلاق النار، عذراً اعتقدت السلامة كان على. Pronunciation is getting better and I figure I'll get plenty of practice. Sorry, basic translation: - Fuck off we are full, - On the ground, face down mother fucker and - Stop or I'll shoot, sorry I thought the safety was on.

All the best for your endeavours, you will be missed.

I've got a better idea, why don't you go somewhere because you are pissing me off. You start a new thread for that?

(The Image associated with this comment is no longer accessible and has been removed). I'm in love :-* :-* :-* :-*

Nice sentiment Woody. Unfortunately once you put on the uniform you can't make choices and some die saving those that either can't be saved or don't deserve to be. Lest we forget.

Good post, Van, but I'm afraid it's pearls before swine. And don't forget, you and I are the same person for hersey-packer Audrey. A pure waste of time. Partly in answer to your question, but more importantly as a way for us to watch Audrey wet her pants, here's an idea: The next time the Muslims launch a major (like a 9-11-2001 type) attack on the American homeland, what if every patriotic American took out as many local Muslims as they could? Would that cause even more strikes against the homeland? Perhaps. But using that method, pretty soon no more Muslims. Right, Audrey? Now I'm gutted Karen, I thought you and I were the same person, not Woody. Now I just feel totally abandoned and rejected, only half the man I used to be. But I know you guys will make a good team, so it's not all bad. So.... that means you believe in Yesterday.... suddenly? Yep...but my troubles never seemed far away.

Got a British passport old mate, and an Aussie one, dual citizen, born in the UK, choose to live in Australia. Why, get away from tossers like you fucking up the country and you are obviously doing a good job of it. Gave you the benefit of the doubt, checked out David Coleman, just in case I had missed something in this far off land. Coleman was challenged by a handful of radical students who managed to drag out his support of eugenics. So what? That was in 2007 and hardly made a ripple, no wonder I missed it. Didn't exactly destroy his career. And eugenics, or similar principles, maybe the only thing that will save the world from the eventual population explosion. Check out what the Galton Institute is doing, more fucking good than your radical students I bet. No I didn't miss the bit about stopping the bombing of these countries to stop the flow of migrants because that isn't happening and isn't the cause, unless you are blaming the selective bombing being used to stop ISIS? I did reference the bombing of Germany in WWII that is the cause of Germany's muslim problem, did you miss that or is that not an issue in your educated experience? Can you be a huge tosser or is complete tosser as much as you can achieve?

And? The stats are still the stats. Doesn't matter who uses them, they still show you poor white boys are in decline. By the way, remember the German issue with Turks and muslims was about the migrants that came to help them rebuild in the 60s after we bombed the crap out of Germany, not the middle east or Turkey. As I said, tosser.

An analysis done last year of Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures by Migrationwatch-linked expert David Coleman, Professor of Demography at Oxford University, showed that the Muslim population in Britain was multiplying 10 times faster than the rest of society. According to Professor Coleman, the increase was directly attributable to immigration and a higher birth rate. “The implications are very substantial,” Professor Coleman said. “Some of the Muslim population, by no means all of them, are the least socially and economically integrated of any in the United Kingdom ... and the one most associated with political dissatisfaction.” This figure ties in well with earlier ONS projections which showed that the ethnic population of Britain as a whole was growing 15 times faster than the indigenous British population. ONS data showed that the number of people from “minority ethnic groups” grew by 15 percent compared to 1 percent for white people. Other figures have suggested that there will be more Muslims in Britain’s mosques on Fridays than Anglicans in church on Sundays within 10 years. Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the Diocese of Bradford which covers the city, the western quarter of North Yorkshire and parts of East Lancashire, South-East Cumbria and Leeds. According to official attendance figures, ‘usual’ Sunday churchgoing across the diocese’s 147 parishes fell from 13,500 in 2000 to 8,700 in 2008. There are now more than 20,000 regular Muslim worshippers in the town which has an astonishing 80 mosques. The figures make it clear that simply halting Third World immigration will not be enough to save Britain and preserve its unique identity and culture, but that the immigration tsunami will have to be reversed as well. So now that we know you are an expert on the crisis in the Middle East, know more about Germany than the German Chancellor, it's obvious that you will be a total whizz when it comes to the UK. Now I know this article makes use of the data to explain an issue with the church, but the facts are the facts. So to make it easier for you to rubbish this data as well, because you obviously know better, here are brief profiles of the two key sources of the information. David Coleman (born 1946) has been the Professor of Demography at the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford since October 2002, and a lecturer since 1980. He is currently based in the respected Department for Social Policy and Intervention. Between 1985 and 1987 he worked for the British Government, as the Special Adviser to the Home Secretary, and then to the Ministers of Housing and of the Environment. He is a fellow of St John's College, Oxford. He has published over 90 papers and eight books and was the joint editor of the European Journal of Population from 1992 to 2000. In 1997 he was elected to the Council of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. He is also an advisor to Migration Watch UK which he helped to found, and is a member of the Galton Institute, formerly known as the Eugenics Society. In 2013, Coleman's analysis said that White British people would be a minority in the UK by 2070 if current immigration trends continued. The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK. It is responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels. It plays a leading role in national and international good practice in the production of official statistics. How does your resume stand up against Professor Coleman. I mean, you do claim to be an expert in all his fields of speciality. Mate, we can't be in the same library because you are not even on the same planet. You can't be, unless you are totally blind. Old English expression comes to mind: You are a complete tosser. ( I like the urban dictionary version, Useless, pathetic, incapable of doing anything right.)

Don’t divulge anything. The UN Security Council employs private advisors and would pay millions, literally millions for a solution to crisis in the Middle East and those in the rest of the world. For a fee, say a third, I’ll work as your manager. You need to do it in stages. First of all just give them a run-down of the number of improvements and outcomes, but don’t give away the strategy. Next, a small teaser, bit of a sample to prove you can do it. We won't worry about Europe or the USA at the moment, lets just concentrate on the Middle East. Maybe fix the Israeli / Palestinian crisis. What do you think? Once you’ve got their attention, time to negotiate a contract. That’s where I come in. I reckon a 7, no at least an 8 figure salary. Then we have to work out a fixed period of employment. I reckon a year to get all the resources together and another year to draft the package. Then there’s the implementation stage, but I’m not sure about this so I’ll need some direction from you. I was thinking 750 – 800 years. I know, how about we just round it off at 1,000 years that should be enough. What do you think? By the way, I’d like my share up front.

Chancellor Angela Merkel has said bluntly that Germany has failed to integrate large immigrant communities. The complaint is that most Turks and Muslims who came to Germany in the 1960s to jumpstart the German economy after World War II have not integrated into German society. They kept their language, religion and most of their cultural habits. Instead of blending in, they created their own parallel societies. Aubrey, Bulgachica or whatever you call yourself, you have finally cracked. You are now not only an expert on the middle east, you now claim to know more about Germany than the German Chancellor? Outside influences? The complaint is about the muslims' inside influences. WTF?

My shout if you can guess the language.

The full translated quote: http://www.unaoc.org/ibis/2010/11/01/merkel-on-mosques-in-germany/ Chancellor Angela Merkel pointed out in an interview with the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” that integration was an important task for German people facing immigration. Germans need to accept that immigration is changing the character of the country. Indeed, “mosques will be a more prominent part of [the] urban landscape than before.” Merkel reminded that the German constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Respect and tolerance can only be guaranteed if laws and all articles of the constitution are respected. The University of Osnabrueck has launched a program that goes in this direction: training Muslim spiritual leaders to help Muslim communities to integrate. It's quite easy to pick bits out of translated reports then add a bit of guff in the way you do Ozi that I'm sure gets people like Woody hard but she is in fact saying that Muslim people are required to follow the laws of Germany if they wish to be tolerated. I love the fact that you have to explain to your cretins who Angela Merkel is and you feel the need to explain that the title of Chancellor means that she performs a similar function to Prime Ministers in our respective countries. That's what I'm talking about right there, fucking beautiful, thanks. As usual, you have chosen to ignore the focus of the quote, Merkel's quote, not what the University is or isn't doing because that's not part of her quote. It's got nothing to do with teaching muslims to intergrate which, by the way, has never occurred anywhere else. The focus of Merkel's statement is that Germany will, not may, but will become an Islamic stronghold. An Islamic stronghold means Sharia Law. The only integration going on there will be the non-muslims game enough to stay on, if the Islamic state will let them live. And there are many people who read these posts so not all will necessarily know who Merkel is. And I didn't say she performs a similar function, I was confirming that she is equivalent. Are you suggesting she's not?

Quote: Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily. “Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.” Merkel’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold. Now lots of people are going to say here we go again, another uneducated racist, spreading hate and fear amongst the German people, fuelling the racists and bigots that support her views. But, for those that don’t know her, the significance being that Angela Merkal is the German Chancellor. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but that’s the equivalent of the British or Australian Prime Minister, the elected, sorry, re-elected leader of the country. And that from one of the most powerful and influential member countries of Europe. Who could have guessed it.

Israel must grow to defend itself. It needs more territory for an ever growing population, needed to expand its military forces. If Israel was ever caught up in a one-on-one war with Egypt, they could potentially lose. It is more than feasible that it could take out Syria. A safer course of action would be either Jordan or Lebanon, neither of whom are military threats and are easily defeated. In fact, Israel could defeat both Jordan and Lebanon simultaneously with perfectly-planned invasions. Depending on the outcome of current circumstances, Iran and Iraq are likely to go to war against each other. This would be a protracted conflict with both sides trying to develop nuclear weapons. An exchange of nuclear weapons would trigger a global holocaust, a potential outcome. Egypt could also decide to go to war against Israel, and Syria, sooner or later, would join the conflict, mopping up Jordan and Lebanon on the way. The main problem would be ensuring that Egypt and Syria attack concurrently, so as not to create a protracted war. The optimal solution for Israel seems to be to take Egypt out immediately with a perfect surprise attack using a single brigade to push the war right to the Egyptian side, followed by invading Lebanon before it collapses and Jordan before anyone else invades it, while attempting to topple Iran by espionage (to prevent nuclear war with Iraq) and then, finally, invading and defeating Syria. It is important to take out any nuclear installations in the other countries, so as to prevent rivals from gaining nuclear weapons. This can be done via airstrikes, but only before an invasion. Israel risks getting nuked if the opposing side completes an installation during war. And the cost of this solution, nothing. It’s the possible strategies from Conflict: Middle East Political Simulator and can be downloaded free. Used correctly, it currently has as much chance as any other solution put forward by military experts, political experts, religious experts, think tanks, UN councils or armchair warriors, absolutely none.

In other words, you don't have anything.

Why not? A few have asked you for your solution.

He might not be joking! SQUIRRELS make a “good food source” and should be served up as a way of controlling the population, the organiser of a controversial squirrel burger cooking contest in the UK has said. Rachel Thomas staged the challenge at the Forest Showcase Food and Drink Festival in southwest England at the weekend, which proved a hit with punters but angered animal rights activists. Competitors had a quarter of a pound (115 grams) of minced-up grey squirrel to work with — plus their imagination. A “Cajun Melt” effort came first ahead of “Chicken of the Tree Surprise”. “There was plenty to go round. Lots of people came and tried and they were very tasty and very positively received,” exhibit co-ordinator Rachel Thomas told AFP. She described the taste as a combination of chicken and rabbit. “If you eat meat, why not squirrel? Lambs, rabbits, they’re all cute animals so we don’t see what the fuss is all about,” Thomas said. “They are, we think, a good food source. We decided, let’s get a bit of education out there, it’s about time they were managed properly.” Instead of simply trapping and gassing them, “we should be actually using them for a food source instead”. Introduced from North America from 1876 to 1929, grey squirrels are now thought to outnumber England’s native reds by 66 to one. Squirrel meat is available in some shops and a few restaurants do serve up squirrel-based dishes but the consumption is minimal and remains very niche. A spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said: “Our shops are brimming with healthy and delicious grains, pasta, beans, rice, nuts, fruits, almond milks and soya puddings. “More and more Brits are realising that these are not only far kinder choices but also far more nourishing than the dead bodies of squirrels, ponies or any other animal for that matter.” This was published the day after you went walkabout, so you can understand the concern. Dead bodies of ponies??????

Mate, I can't wait. You have the solution for the middle east?

Wrong again.