happyone

That I can agree on, but make sure you include the Clintons--who do the same thing with their phony Clinton foundation.

That statement by Michelle had nothing to do with the Russia collusion hoax, it only referred to the demeaner and actions of bullying perceived by Michelle Obama during the Presidential debates and campaigning of 2016.

Hold that thought as you grow older. 😏

Everyone should react this way when responding to O_U812 and golfer06 just like Michelle Obama suggested against Donald Trump (another bully), whos style they have both perfectly copied. Must be a secret admiration 😏 At the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Michelle Obama first uttered her now-famous catchphrase, “When they go low, we go high” while discussing how to “handle bullies” in support of Hillary Clinton’s bid for the White House. Her motto quickly caught on. Even Clinton herself used it to defend herself against then-Republican candidate Donald Trump a few months later during their final presidential debate.

It is very amusing that your posts are so much like the tweets and remarks of the person you hate so much, President Trump 😏

And all of this explains why I don't post much anymore 😏

Got it mixed up--In N Out is animal style and Burger King is have it your way. Anyway In N Out was my favorite (even if I used to be an animal) 😏

Maybe you all don't have this, but for fast foods, I prefer in n out where you can have it your way 😏 (or at least I used to before these damn hormone treatments)

Windows 12 will be Covid free 😏

Says the 2 Bobbsey Twins 😏 (The Bobbsey Twins are the principal characters of what was, for many years, the Stratemeyer Syndicate's longest-running series of American children's novels)

It really will not make any difference whether or not President Trump pardons him and his family--because that pardon is only valid for Federal crimes. The States can still prosecute.

Well, I see all the children are still posting in this thread.

Good thing for you all is she doesn't sing while masturbating 😏

Gavin Newsome would love to attend another party. 😏

Biden Picks John Kerry, Paris Accord Author, as Climate Czar - Bloomberg Climate CZAR--now what does that title indicate---Now we have an incompetent John Kerry with broad powers over climate regulations- Anyone remember the Iran fiasco when he was Secretary of State ???

8 hours ago, StnCld316 said: Yes @HarleyFatboy you have your chimes or as most recognize it as a Sound you get when a Notification is received whether someone mentions you or reply's by a Quote to a post in a Topic you have made a comment in or by a PM received. Harley HarleyFatboy HarleyFatboy Testing Testing Testing 😏

Sounds about like the Leora thread--97% are fanatics😏

They do!!! 2nd time you mentioned it 😏

The electorate voted to remove President Trump, but hopefully smart enough not to give the Democrats full control by not giving them the Senate majority. And I think Biden wants that result anyway, so he doesn't have to bow down to the radical ideas of AOC, her mob, Schumer and Pelosi.

wrong pic 😏

I would guess 5,000,001--so Trump won??? 😏

You don't say !!!😏

The election may be over, but the leftists and anarchists are not done yet as even reported by the left leaning Newsweek Antifa yell "F*** Trump, F*** Biden" as they march through streets of Washington, D.C. on election night WWW.NEWSWEEK.COM Videos posted on social media show large numbers of demonstrators took to the streets of the U.S. capital on Tuesday night. Videos circulating on social media early Wednesday morning showed large numbers of antifa and Black Lives Matter protesters marching in the streets near the White House, chanting "F*** Trump! F*** Biden!"

Sorry StnCld, the 22nd amendment to the Constitution deals with the term of the President--However, given the make up of Congress---IMO it just would not happen and he would not get support from 3/4 majority of the States. What would it take to repeal the 22nd Amendment? So, yes, Trump could absolutely push for a repeal of the current limit. Off the back of a strong State of the Union and personal best approval rating, he might even garner enough support. It would require a two-thirds majority proposal in the Senate or the House. States would then have to ratify the amendment with a three-quarters majority. The odds are against him, though. A Constitutional repeal has only happened once, to repeal the 18th Amendment which established Prohibition. It’s difficult and unlikely, but not impossible.