Epikouros

I didn't like her face, to be precise. And no charisma or interesting personality, to me.

You still haven't answered the most important question: why you watch / enjoy RLC?... Do you, in fact, enjoy RLC? No? Why are you watching, then? Yes? Why are you complaining, then?

Shantal is a lot better looking & looks to have more charisma & exudes more sex appeal than Nana though. I never really watched Nana, is she wasn't my type.

It's what I speculated in the previous thread. Jokingly, though. But you never know... Edit: judging by her still doing tent bates, she knows the cams are back on. Or at least considers it possible they are back on. Still, she is now less shy about showing her perfect body naked for longer than a few sec. I knew she would get better! There may still be room for more... 🙂

I can can live with that. Just wondering why you are watching / enjoying RLC, then... Edit: PS: Gloria is a strong girl. She'll get over it. Maybe sooner than you will. I guess you might feel more hurt than she does...

Sometimes I wonder why some people actually watch RLC... And comment here as though they are watching a soap series... These villas are a rather unique environment, hardly comparable to 'normal' life situations. It is (more or less) 'real life', but in an 'unreal' (created for a certain purpose) environment...

I don't condemn (or judge, for maybe a better word) anyone.

I call that a healthy libido! 🙂 She just approaches sex like a lot of guys do, still, girls are more condemned/judged for that than guys. So, it's kind of brave of her not to be ashamed for this. There's a reason she gets along well with Ashley, who has a similar 'free spirit'...

I love that Ari likes to walk around naked. And why wouldn't she, in the villas?...

Ari liked to walk around the house naked too, this morning & noon. Even on the balcony, she only donned a robe, which she left open. She likes to feel free! 🙂

Zara tanning nude on the terrace. So, either neighbours can't see her over there, or she doesn't care. I'm fine with both! 🙂 Only wondering why they don't tan / swim naked more often, though. Topless seemed common the last days or weeks, but it's the first time I see one of the girls naked at that spot...

That's true! 🙂 But in that case, once she knows, she may get more shy again. That wouldn't be so good... Though she was already getting a bit less shy the day before the apartment closed. So, let's hope for the best!...

She seems less shy than before. 🙂 Edit: maybe she doesn't know yet that the cams have been turned on again? 😉

I believe you are close to the truth. However, Carla was seen doing cam shows, and probably others before her. So maybe there is no rule against that? It could generate extra viewers on the RLC site too, after all... Maybe they're not supposed to mention which site they're camming for, though?... On the other hand, we don't see Carla doing this anymore as far as I know, so maybe they asked her to stop? Or she grew tired of camming herself, for whatever reason. It's a much harder, more 'active' job interacting with (often annoying) viewers all the time than just passively leading your life in a house with cams, with otherwise almost total freedom and no interaction with 'customers', unless they want to read this forum (which I wouldn't advise them...).

I think I know someone on here who's going to explode, lol! By the way, I love Ashley and her completely liberated & carefree ways!

In order not to be all too obvious? People watching the cams might complain! 😉 Some might want them lectured or even kicked out for this! But what are the RLC tenant rules anyway? Anyone here has a list of those rules? Of course, we can assume that there are rules against drug use on cam. How strictly they are enforced is, however, another matter, and can depend on time & circumstances. They might have become a bit less strict with time, (new owners or not) and/or because they have trouble finding good tenants?... What is your explanation for them not being kicked, contrary to the previous ones who apparently got kicked for it? Maybe in the previous case they were just too obvious about it, while in the current case there is still "plausible deniability"?... They might have gotten a lecture by email or app, or off cam. Maybe they'll try to be more discreet in the future, because of jackasses complaining. But frankly, I don't care. It think it would be quite drastic to kick them for smoking some joints. As for the laws: in Spain they might get a fine (in theory), while in Russia they'd risk years of jail. But the previous case was also in Spain apparently, so this hardly matters. Maybe they still had a more 'panicking' reaction back then, because in the Russian apartments it would have been very risky indeed?

I know, but RLC rules are of course (partly) based on state laws where they reside. And another question: do we actually know the RLC rules for tenants? Or just from hearsay?...

Well, it seems the reaction is not as strong now as it was then. RLC has new owners for a while now, maybe they are more 'in sync with the times' than the previous ones? Or maybe they were looking to get rid of these tenants for some other reason, and the drug use was just the justification?

Were these joints? Or harder drugs? Also, maybe the apartment in question was in Russia? Or another country where they have harsh laws against even soft drugs? Spain is more tolerant in this regard. So, a lot may depend on the kind of drug, and in which country they are used. Do you know which drugs were used, and where?

And as I explained, many rules are there to fall back to if there is actually some trouble, but are otherwise rarely enforced. There is an expression where I come from that sounds: "the soup is not eaten as hot as it is served"... I stated that I did not want them to get kicked out or even reprimanded for smoking joints. But you still didn't clearly give your opinion on the matter, only suggestively. Should they get reprimanded (or even kicked), according to you?

I certainly would not want them to get kicked out for that. But I had the impression you objected to them smoking joints. So maybe you'd want them to be reprimanded for that (or maybe kicked)? Why else would you emphasize them smoking joints, and RLC's (non-applicated) rules on that? If it's not what's in your quote, what are you trying to achieve?

And I missed all of it!... 😞 Still not buying replay though... Yet...

The question remains: why do you care about that? Anyway, that RLC doesn't care about this, is probably just them following the general societal trend of not caring anymore if people smoke joints or not. It simply doesn't matter. There are always some rules (not just on RLC) that need to be mentioned 'officially' or 'juridically', but are, in practice, not observed anymore (or never were). Or are only enforced if someone complains.

I also hear Berlin is quite different from the rest of Germany (in being more tolerant about all kinds of things), so the truth may be somewhere in the middle. Also, Germany has 16 or so "Länder", or 'states/provinces', with partly different laws, Berlin being one of those states. Laws, and how strongly they are enforced, may vary from state to state.

I was mainly talking about Germany (Berlin, mostly). So you didn't reply to my main point. I only referenced Denmark very shortly, between brackets. The info I got was from Danish people I met holidaying in Southern Europe.