*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***
Epikouros
-
Posts
1,306 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
4,895 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by Epikouros
-
Scarlett & Casper 2023 #1
Epikouros replied to Noldus's topic in Scarlett & Casper (06/20/23 - 01/21/24)
Edit: my remark in the previous post belongs here: "Turns out I like her face more than her body (breasts especially, a bit too saggy for me, though I don't like obvious plastic ones either: naturally firm is my thing) . Still, nice to see a guest girl not hiding." -
Scarlett & Casper 2023 #1
Epikouros replied to Noldus's topic in Scarlett & Casper (06/20/23 - 01/21/24)
Turns out I like her face more than her body. Still, nice to see a guest girl not hiding. -
Scarlett & Casper 2023 #1
Epikouros replied to Noldus's topic in Scarlett & Casper (06/20/23 - 01/21/24)
No idea who she is, but she looks cute. I'd welcome her as a participant. -
RE: "Why? Why not accept their premises and believes?" I might ask the same question to you. 😉 About Daytona, for example. Or about other tenants you sometimes criticise in a rather conformist, moralising way. In my case: because my triggering might, in a humorous way, challenge the moral absolutes of some people, might make those people think about their beliefs, and maybe see things from different perspectives. But if they don't, that's just how it is. RE: "As far as moral absolutes...how can a country survive without key absolute values and the family structure giving parenting to the government. Leninist/Stalinist Russia did, Maoist China and North Korea are doing it. It's not the governments' job to take control of the children to indoctrinate them into the collective against what their own parents want." I think neither governments (of whatever ideology), nor religions (of whatever creed), nor even parents (especially once the children are old enough to make up their own minds) should try to indoctrinate children. You could "lead by example", but no one should impose moral absolutes. My opinion. RE: "It's great to say live and let live and let everyone do what they want. It ends in mob violence followed by a dictatorship." That's an opinion (to which you are entitled), not a fact. Even though you present it as fact. It's also not exactly what I said (I didn't say people can do all they want, just that they should be able to if they don't harm anyone else doing so - important distinction). It's vital to keep in mind that there's a big distinction between opinion and fact, and that distinction should be clearly made when discussing - though people on all sides of any conflict often don't. The difference between opinion and fact is actually critical thinking 1.0, taught in high schools in most or all European countries (though, alas, not necessarily successfully), and, hopefully (not quite sure), in most US schools as well.
-
Where did I say Daytona was normal? You may have been referring to someone else. I'm not the only one here countering your conformism. She may not be "normal", but in a free society, she has a right to not be "normal" without being harassed, as she's not harming anyone (with the possible exception of herself, but that comes with freedom). An important difference with psychopaths and molesters. And what is "normal" anyway? Are us voyeurs on CC and RLC "normal"? Who defines what's "normal"?... Is it ok to be a hidden "pervert" but not an obvious one?... It never ceases to amaze me how conformist some voyeurs can be, without realising how they'd be viewed by other conformists if their peeping habits were known. Anyway, I edited my post above, and my edit appeared more or at the same time as your answer above. I'll copy it below: ""I was just countering your statement that animals don't engage in "unnatural" behavior. You didn't adress my counterargument at all, but just keep pushing your viewpoint. And actually I like to trigger all people that tend to think/speak in moral absolutes. This includes both extreme conservatives and extreme wokies (both heirs of American puritanism in their intolerance, cancelling, and use of moral absolutes and lack of a sense of humor). But here on CC it seems mostly extreme conservatives are active and not so much the other extreme. Myself, I'm more of a hedonist, easy going relativist, a bit of an anarchist (some would say nihilist) and a 'just leave people alone' type of guy actually, who likes to see the humor in everything (though getting worried by increasing polarisation as well). I'm thus probably hated by both sides of the (mostly American) culture wars (though it's effects start to trickle in Europe too). Wokes call me a conservative & conservatives call me woke. I'm neither and make fun of both. Both hate nuance, tolerance (though for different things) and humor, so they have more in common than they think. Glad I'm European! (and we don't have death rows over here, another important cultural difference). One more thing: no matter how much you are disgusted by "perverts" of all kinds, remember that in the eyes of most people (again on both sides, and in between too), us voyeurs on CC/RLC are considered "perverts" as well, though of course more hidden ones. But probably more reviled than, say, regular gays or lesbians by most. As long as other "pervs/unnaturals/abominations" are safe and free from harm or harassment, so are we (kind of), and vice versa. Think about that.""
-
I was just countering your statement that animals don't engage in "unnatural" behavior. You didn't adress my counterargument at all, but just keep pushing your viewpoint. And actually I like to trigger all people that tend to think/speak in moral absolutes. This includes both extreme conservatives and extreme wokies (both heirs of American puritanism in their use of moral absolutes and lack of a sense of humor). But here on CC it seems mostly extreme conservatives are active and not so much the other extreme. I'm more of a hedonist, easy going relativist, a bit of an anarchist (some would say nihilist) and a 'just leave people alone' type of guy actually, who likes to see the humor in everything (though getting worried by increasing polarisation as well). I'm thus probably hated by both sides of the (mostly American) culture wars (though it's effects start to trickle in Europe too). Wokes call me a conservative & conservatives call me woke. I make fun of both. Both hate nuance, tolerance (though for different things) and humor, so they have more in common than they think. Glad I'm European! (and we don't have death rows over here, another important cultural difference). One more thing: no matter how much you are disgusted by "perverts" of all kinds, remember that in the eyes of most people (again on both sides, and in between too), us voyeurs on CC/RLC are considered "perverts" as well, though of course more hidden ones. But probably more reviled than, say, regular gays or lesbians by most. As long as other "pervs/unnaturals/abominations" are safe and free harm or harassment, so are we (kind of), and vice versa. Think about that.
-
The ultimate voyeur! You'd start to think it's not (only) disgust or outrage, but maybe also jealousy that drives some peeps on here. 😉
-
There are reports of homosexual lions in Kenya. Some (conservative) people are so shocked by this, they want the lions in question isolated (or worse?...). 😄 Source: too many to list them all here, but very easy to look up.
-
Man you don't like to be proven wrong.
-
And the nephew of someone's neigbour's barber in the 16/17th century saw X looking maliciously at Y and a few days later Y's cow died! This is how witch hunts started back then (with often deadly results), and the same patterns are visible in todays hoaxes & smear campaigns. Interestingly, the Joe Rogan you mention is mentioned several times in the wikipedia link I posted about the cat litter box hoax. The guy doesn't appear to be a reliable source at all. The article in the link is an interesting deconstruction of fake news. Also, no school ever confirmed doing this (except as an emergency toilet in case of lockdown due to a school shooting, not just for cat people - this may have sparked the rumor initially). If a school made a move like this, you'd think they'd also own it. Otherwise, what would be the point? Also, no pics or vids of human-sized litter boxes at schools, in an age where everyone (including conservative staff or students) has a camera at hand to film the things & show them to the world to corroborate the rumour & elicit more efficient outrage. Hoax.
-
Better read up on the later posts. The cat litter box thing is a hoax a lot of people fell for. Identifying as dogs, including their toilet habits, would have been an even funnier story, but was probably a bit too much even for the trolls who thought up the hoax. Imagine a kid taking a dump against the teacher's chair leg (or humping the teacher's leg!), while being held on a leash by another kid! 😄 💩
-
The fact that Americans are shocked over a triviality like this is a source of amusement for many Europeans. Edit: do you mean the individual toilets had no doors? The toilets didn't have dividing walls? That would be very unusual in Europe, too. I'm not Italian though, and not around yet in the 60s. But the times I was in Italy, I never saw this. But I still would like you to elaborate more on your very credible story about cat litter boxes for pupils who identify as cats. 😉 A story about pupils identifying as dogs concerning their toilet habits would have been even funnier though. 💩
-
So you just reply with another piece of almost completely unrelated - and a lot less absurd - news? Not a word anymore about the cat litter boxes in schools for pupils who identify as cats? Weaksauce. I'm disappointed. And actually, over here in Europe, you'll often find bathrooms used by both/all genders, long before there was much talk about wokism or LGBTQ+. No fuss. You can (usually) lock each cubicle door, you know. So I don't really see the problem. And even if they are separated, it's not been that big a deal over here for decades now to use the restroom of the other gender if all the toilets for your own gender are occupied. No problem as you can usually lock the toilet door. Girls do it actually more than guys. Handy if you have to go urgently. They'd probably call the cops on you for that in the US?...
-
Not attracted to Daytona, but I love how this tenant manages to trigger peeps on here! 😄 Reading this forum becomes pure comedy! If I see Daytona (or another tenant I'm not attracted to) shower or otherwise naked, I just click away, without any fuss or freaking out. I wouldn't even dream of kicking up a hissy fit on a voyeur forum about this. No matter how (involuntarily) entertaining that post would be.
-
Yes, I know that. That's the whole point. They are also (generally) well-sourced, especially the Wikipedia pages in English & other major languages. If they aren't, a stub is usually displayed saying (parts of) the article need additional sources. This one is rather elaborate, with a lot of sources: often clickable, verifiable links. The fact that most pages have different contributors that add different & verifiable source material adds to its strength. So, no one is stopping you (or anyone else who believes this obvious hoax) from adding your own take, with reliable & verifiable sources, to the article. 🙂 But be fair: you nor Max Ragnar actually believe this nonsense, right? 😉
-
Source? If it's from an extremist trolling website: their source? And so on... Litter boxes in schools hoax - Wikipedia EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
-
Who's the girl in the shower with Wolf? Neytiri? Her hair seems somewhat different... 😉
-
What about the people who watch these "lost souls" or hedonists?... 😉 (especially if/when their watching habits become known to family & acquaintances?...)
-
Why are people so obsessed to watch & then even write about what Lacrim is doing right now?... He's now gone after all, & Lali is starting to caress Karma... Who also seems more comfortable (breasts exposed now, though in night vision). Isn't that more interesting to watch & write about, than continue to follow & write about what Lacrim does?...
-
Hate to say it, but I think she's more uncomfortable because of the cams (i.e.: us), than because of Lacrim. Hence her fidgeting & trying to cover herself with the blanket in front of the cams.
-
Lacrim hates us (maybe he reads CC...) and tries to cover her with the blanket as well as he can. My (biased) view is that he isn't "trying to be a gentleman", but rather faking to be one, and also trying to piss us off by covering Karma. 😄
-
Cats always are. They tolerate humans on their territory because they give them food, cuddles & warmth. 😉 Edit: he is also the only permanent resident, so it stands to reason he's the real master!
-
The smileys are because your question is funny. No need for insults. I will try to explain, with my obviously limited IQ of 40. Judging by what you don't like, VHTV would be your thing even less than RLC is. In fact, a common critique on CC about VHTV is that it's a lot "more slutty & with more buttholes" (to use your own terms) than RLC. But of course, with your superior intellect, you already found that out. So no need for me to answer your question with text (& thus rather use smileys for comic effect, and also because you even blocked me in the first place, but you can still see my smileys, so it was my only way to be helpful to you anyway). Or even for you to ask the question in the first place as a 5 min glance at VHTV (free version) would answer your question. Unless your IQ is even lower than the score of 40 you tried to insult me with. Of course, as you apparently blocked me, you probably won't see this enlightening answer. But maybe a kind soul might forward it or quote it to you. Glad to be of service!🙂
-
Does anyone know the name of the cat? If not: any suggestions for a name?
