In fact voyeur-villa use a very weak efficiency algorithm to compress their video for streaming. The hd stream uses easily 250 KB/S even when there are few movements or night vision.
RealLifecam uses 50KB/s stream for a really better quality video stream. In night vision when tenants are sleeping we have between 5 and 25KB/s stream whereas voyeur-villa keep their stream at 200-300kB/s.
The reason is Reallifecam use an algortihm where only a little zone of the picture where real motion occurs is sent. Voyeur villa algo doesnt use this optimization and always estimates that all the screen need to be updated and send informations for the whole screen.
So if voyeur villa wants to improve their loading capabilities, they must first change their streaming algorithm and then increases bandwith.
Excuse my french