Jump to content

philo

Members
  • Posts

    4,914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    13,005 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by philo

  1. Well, the guys second move was to poke Radi with his boner. That got him shown the door....Click bate it was.
  2. "No, No, No...I know your plan". Radi shot down the guys first move and I fear he may not have the courage to try again. If he persists he may make some progress. If there was absolutely no interest then he may not have been invited back again unless, indeed, he is Radi's click bate as someone has already stated.
  3. The real Stella show was the one that we did not get to see. The day that Gina, Bruno and Stella went to the beach (according to the interpreters) and Gina came back crying shortly after they left was the storyline that would have captured first place for those keeping score. Both Stella and Bruno were awol all day after that. That is the round that I wanted to see. LOL
  4. It's good that Radi and her friend are speaking in English so I won't need the filter of an interpreter. If the guy is trying to be her friend then he may be making some progress. Their conversation seems too intellectual for him to be trying to take her to bed. His kissing attempt made her aware of his interests but he seems not to have much skill at seduction. I would be surprised if there is anything sexual on camera tonight. I hope that I am wrong but I don't think that their conversation is moving in that direction.
  5. If some of you are trying to say that Leora is just doing a show to replace the play slot that Malia used to occupy then I concur. This skype show that Leora is engaged in is less than entertaining and I would not still be watching except for the enjoyment of catching her fan club in some of the lies that they have been promulgating for the past years. Now it's more than boring. Peace Out.
  6. Just saying but not saying much as usual.
  7. I enjoy watching individuals try and debate something that is demonstrably obvious. Leora is wearing a see through nighty cut to reveal her amble tits except for her perky nipples while video chatting with a woman and a man, yet there are those who want to debate that Leora is flashing? This is starting to be fun. LOL
  8. So if you want in on this discussion, then I suggest that you come with something better than your typical one liners.
  9. So this "Gentleman" challenges my statement that Leora is flashing. Then, he changes the discussion of the debate by alluding to a particular camera. That makes no sense what so ever unless he refers to a time stamp. I never even referenced which camera I was watching. In fact, I normally watch every camera available to in particular room simultaneously. Then, I often re-watch the scene on replay before I post about it. That's why it gets so exasperating at times to try and have a conversation with someone who has not done their homework. I still say that Leora is flashing. If those who have watched the replay want to disagree, then we can discuss specific times and cameras. Otherwise, I have stopped entertaining the trolls.
  10. I don't respond to your questions because you are not a person who is capable of having a logical conversation. Again, let's let people who want to follow such trivia, look at the replay for themselves if they missed it and judge whom is trying to mislead.
  11. A smart troll would recognize that people can go to the replay and see for themselves what happened.
  12. Another example of the trolls who don't post about much but wait to attack someone else' posts and then with little results.
  13. I see thighs and glimpses of crotch on my screen of Leora's screen. Not just the head and upper body that you proclaim. Bye the way, how long has the couple that Leora is chatting with been married? Do you know that or, is declaring them as married an example of an imagination gone just a bit too far?
  14. Thank God for RLC replay. It has made liars of some many experts so many times that you would hope they would gain a bit of humility...but no, they persist in their expertise. Only us lowly people believe what we see with our own eyes rather than their explanations.
  15. Now that Leora has moved to the sofa, she shows us what is seen on the screen on her laptop at 00:25. I see her thighs just inches above her crotch. Looks like more than just head and upper body to me.
  16. I could see the male persons ass on the video chat video but they cannot see Leoras ass? The subjects were described as Leora video chatting with her female friend until I mentioned that there was a man in the video as well. Then, the experts immediately announce it is the woman's husband? Then, in their infinite wisdom they reference my "fertile imagination"? How comical ! It is but another textbook example of how self appointed experts try to dissuade the analysis and interpretations of any observations other than their own, and guide the group thought towards their prescribed scripted scenarios.
  17. Thank you Most Knowledgable One. By "upper body", do you mean her tits or not? When she went to the refrigerator to get another bottle of wine, was her camera positioned so that the couple could not see her naked ass? I'm sure you know the answers to my questions because you know exactly how her camera is angled and have calculated what is within their range of vision. Thank you again for your knowledge about the marital status of the person Leora is chatting with. Since I was able to see that the male was not wearing pants when he stood up, did they fail to angle their camera in the same way that Leora did so that only their faces is visible? We are so lucky to have someone with so much more knowledge than everyone else. What would we do without it?
  18. Am I the only one who saw two people on the video chat with Leora? One of them appeared to be a male. Is Leora flashing the people on the other end of the transmission or will someone knowledgeable come to tell me, like they did the last time, that the people on the other end cannot see what Leora is displaying?
  19. Speaking of calling out instances of ethical lapses: Shout out to RLC for reposting that the twins: Lia and Mia had rejoined the project after they had already been aboard for more than a month, so that the loss of Amira, Monica, Ariana, Elian, Pam, Tesia, and Malia, would not look so stark in comparison to the new member (Stella) who rejoined during the same period.
  20. I have just gotten caught up on my reading of the posts over the past few days. Looks like some of the bi-lingual folk are playing the "I've go a secret" game with information they have decided to withhold. At the same time, some are expecting that what they do share, to be accepted without challenge. Of course it is their decision about what they choose to share or not share. Doing so, however, also disqualifies them from being viewed as an unbiased translator of the conversations. It puts them squarely into the category of interpreter...deciding what and how to share the information in a way other than plainly. I can only imagine that the "unmentionable" subject must be about drug use, since anything sexual has been fair game from the beginning of this forum. So why is any mention of drug use an unmentionable subject on this apartment? There is no hesitancy about mentioning the possibility of drug use when it comes to Gina, or Stella, or the scores of other RLC participants who have been referred to in that way. I hope Martina fans won't try and put her on the same pedestal as Leora's fans have done. There is only one direction away from the pedestal.
  21. It looks like Marta has had the last word for RLC tonight. She gets to turn out the lights. I have been a voyeur on this platform for many years and to see them roll up the sidewalks at 11:00pm EST is sad. Peace Out.
  22. Has anyone talked about Nelly and why she is sleeping separately from Bog tonight?
  23. I bet that the girls are as disappointed as we were about the lack of action tonight. I would love to see what Marta was up to. Any votes for a camera on the patio?
×
×
  • Create New...